Untitled Document
The active-duty Army is in danger of failing to meet its recruiting goals,
and is beginning to suffer from manpower strains like those that have dropped
the National Guard and Reserves below full strength, according to Army figures
and interviews with senior officers .
For the first time since 2001, the Army began the fiscal year in October with
only 18.4 percent of the year's target of 80,000 active-duty recruits already
in the pipeline. That amounts to less than half of last year's figure and falls
well below the Army's goal of 25 percent.
Meanwhile, the Army is rushing incoming recruits into training as quickly
as it can. Compared with last year, it has cut by 50 percent the average number
of days between the time a recruit signs up and enters boot camp. It is adding
more than 800 active-duty recruiters to the 5,201 who were on the job last year,
as attracting each enlistee requires more effort and monetary incentives.
Driving the manpower crunch is the Army's goal of boosting the number of combat
brigades needed to rotate into Iraq and handle other global contingencies. Yet
Army officials see worrisome signs that young American men and women -- and
their parents -- are growing wary of military service, largely because of the
Iraq conflict.
"Very frankly, in a couple of places our recruiting pool is getting soft,"
said Lt. Gen. Franklin L. Hagenbeck, the Army's personnel chief. "We're
hearing things like, 'Well, let's wait and see how this thing settles out in
Iraq,' " he said in an interview. "For the active duty for '05 it's
going to be tough to meet our goal, but I think we can. I think the telling
year for us is going to be '06."
Other senior military officers have voiced similar concerns in recent days.
"I anticipate that fiscal year '05 will be very challenging for both active
and reserve component recruiting," Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a House Appropriations subcommittee Feb. 17. The
Marine Corps fell short of its monthly recruiting quota in January for the first
time in nearly a decade.
Because the Army is the main U.S. military ground force, its ability to draw
recruits is critical to the nation's preparedness to fight current and future
wars. The Army can sustain its ranks through retaining more experienced soldiers
-- and indeed retention in 2004 was 107 percent -- but if too few young recruits
sign up, the force will begin to age. Moreover, higher retention in the active-duty
Army translates into a dwindling stream of recruits for the already troubled
Army Guard and Reserve.
Army officials say the challenge is not yet a crisis. As of Jan. 31, the Army
tallied 22,246 active-duty recruits for fiscal 2005, exceeding the year-to-date
mission by more than 100.
Still, the recruiting difficulties reflect unprecedented demands on today's
soldiers that are unlikely to let up soon. Never before has the all-volunteer
Army deployed to war zones in such large numbers for multiple, yearlong tours.
It is doing so with a total force cut by 300,000 troops -- from 28 active-duty
and reserve divisions to 18 -- since the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
The Army is now working to add 30,000 soldiers by 2009, expanding the active-duty
force from 482,000 to 512,000, as it builds 10 to 15 new combat brigades to
add to divisions for overseas tours. But cultivating so many fresh recruits
without lowering standards is a serious challenge, senior Army leaders say.
"If you cut down 300,000 trees, you can do that pretty quick, but now grow
30,000 of them back," Gen. Peter Schoomaker, Army chief of staff, told
a House Armed Services committee hearing Feb. 9. "It takes time, as you
know, to grow the quality soldier."
Time, however, is what the Army lacks.
Beyond replacing normal turnover each year, officials say the Army must accelerate
recruitment to meet an aggressive timeline for filling out the new brigades
of 3,500 to 4,000 soldiers each, as well as to expand and reorganize the 33
existing brigades.
Newly trained troops are essentially being rationed out -- a process Army officers
call "turning on the faucet" -- a few months before the brigades are
to deploy to Iraq, Afghanistan or elsewhere. The military plans to keep about
120,000 troops in Iraq through 2006.
"The priority fill goes to deploying units to make sure they are at full
strength before they go overseas," says Col. Joseph Anderson, who until
this month served as chief of staff of the 101st Airborne Division at Fort Campbell,
Ky.