Untitled Document
Is it possible Markos Alberto Moulitsas Zúñiga, leader of the “Kossaks,”
that is to say followers and fawners of the Daily Kos, is a CIA operative? Francis
Holland, posting on the My Left Wing messageboard, details Moulitsas’ relationship
with the CIA:
“Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, owner of the DailyKos website, now admits
that he spent six months in the employ of the US Central Intelligence Agency
in 2001,” writes Holland. “In a one-hour interview on June 2, 2006
at the Commonwealth Club, Moulitsas, also known as ‘Kos,’ admitted
that he was a CIA employee and would have ‘no problem working for them’
in the present.”
“I applied to the CIA and I went all the way to the end, I mean it was
to the point where I was going to sign papers to become Clandestine Services,”
Moulitsas admits in the interview. “And it was at that point that the
Howard Dean campaign took off and I had to make a decision whether I was gonna
kinda join the Howard Dean campaign, that whole process, or was I was going
to become a spy. (Laughter in the audience.) It was going to be a tough decision
at first, but then the CIA insisted that if, if I joined that, they’d
want me to do the first duty assignment in Washington, DC, and I hate Washington,
DC. Six years in Washington, DC [inaudible] that makes the decision a lot easier.”
Moulitsas considers the CIA “a very liberal institution,” never
mind the agency, according to John Stockwell, former CIA Station Chief in Angola
(see my John Stockwell: The Third World War video), is responsible for killing
more than six million people.
This is a very liberal institution. And in a lot of ways, it really does
attract people who want to make a better, you know, want to make the world
a better place…. Of course, they’ve got their Dirty Ops and
this and that, right but as an institution itself the CIA is really interested
in stable world. That’s what they’re interested in. And stable
worlds aren’t created by destabilizing regimes and creating wars….
I don’t think it’s a very partisan thing to want a stable world.
And even if you’re protecting American interests, I mean that can
get ugly at times, but generally speaking I think their hearts in the right
place. As an organization their heart is in the right place. I’ve
never had any problem with the CIA. I’d have no problem working for
them
Is it possible Mr. Moulitsas does not have a problem with the documented fact
the CIA’s predecessor, the Overseas Secret Service, imported Nazis to
work for the soon to be created CIA under General Reinhard Gehlen? “Gehlen
was far from the only Nazi war criminal employed by the CIA. Others included
Klaus Barbie (’the Butcher of Lyon’), Otto von Bolschwing (the Holocaust
mastermind who worked closely with Eichmann) and, SS Colonel Otto Skorzeny (a
great favorite of Hitler’s),” writes Mark Zepezauer (The CIA’s
Greatest Hits, Odonian Press, 1994). “There’s even evidence that
Martin Bormann, Hitler’s second-in-command at the end of the war, faked
his own death and escaped to Latin America, where he worked with CIA-linked
groups.
Or that the CIA financed the P-2 Masonic lodge, connected with the Vatican
and the Mafia, and enthusiastically supported Operation Gladio, the “strategy
of tension” terrorist “stay behind army” effort in Europe,
responsible of train station bombings and assassinations, run by former SS Nazis?
Is it possible Mr. Moulitsas supports the CIA effort to create shell banks such
as the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, accurately characterized by
former CIA director and current Sec. Def. Robert Gates as “the Bank of
Crooks and Criminals International”? Does Moulitsas support the idea of
MK-ULTRA, a program designed to test “radiation, electric shocks, electrode
implants, microwaves, ultrasound and a wide range of drugs on unwitting subjects,
including hundreds of prisoners at California’s infamous Vacaville State
Prison,” as Zepezauer notes? Or what about the CIA getting into the heroin
business with the Corsican Mafia, paving the way for highly profitable drug
importation operations in Central America and Afghanistan, money used not only
to enrich the “investment” (in death and misery) bankers but also
used for the CIA’s black budget? How liberal is it to engage in assassination,
genocide, and plotting the overthrow of governments in Iran, Guatemala, Indonesia
(where more than 500,000 people were put to death, many of them due to CIA drafted
“death lists”), and dozens of other countries?
Of course, the CIA long ago penetrated the “liberal” as well as
the “conservative” corporate media in America. “Among the
executives who lent their cooperation to the Agency were William Paley of the
Columbia Broadcasting System, Henry Luce of Time Inc., Arthur Hays Sulzberger
of the New York Times, Barry Bingham Sr. of the Louisville Courier-Journal and
James Copley of the Copley News Service. Other organizations which cooperated
with the CIA include the American Broadcasting Company, the National Broadcasting
Company, the Associated Press, United Press International, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers,
Scripps-Howard, Newsweek magazine, the Mutual Broadcasting System, The Miami
Herald, and the old Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald-Tribune. By far
the most valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been
with The New York Times, CBS, and Time Inc.,” writes Watergate journalist
Carl Bernstein (Rolling Stone, Oct. 20, 1977). “From the Agency’s
perspective, there is nothing untoward in such relationships, and any ethical
questions are a matter for the journalistic profession to resolve, not the intelligence
community.”
Indeed, it would appear Markos Moulitsas finds nothing “untoward in such
relationships,” if we are to believe his above quoted comments.
Finally, Moulitsas’ relationship with the CIA makes perfect sense, as
Daily Kos appears to be yet another political front operation tasked with cracking
the whip over “progressive” Democrats and marching them off to support
the Bilderberger Queen Hillary Clinton and her probable running mate, Barack
Obama, both on record as supporting the neocon plan to reduce the Muslim world
to a smoldering wasteland, albeit with stylistic policy changes. It is no secret
the CIA has long stage managed the controlled opposition and Moulitsas’
admitted relationship with the agency should be considered a coup de grâce,
an effort designed to reduce the “progressive” Democrat opposition
to the invasion and occupation of Iraq and the impending attack to be leveled
against Iran as little more than an empty and absurd rhetorical slogan.
_______________________________
Read from Looking Glass News
CIA's "Worldwide Attack Matrix"
Exposing the Pat Roberts Intelligence Scholars Program: The CIA's Campus Spies
"It's An Excellent Relationship": NYPD on Police - CIA Links
Bush Authorized Domestic Spying: Post-9/11 Order Bypassed Special Court
Go to Original Article >>>
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.
|