Emotional shell game accusation of 'disgracing victim's memories' doesn't
Another 9/11 family member has gone public to rubbish the conspiracy theory
that the attacks were planned and executed by nineteen incompetent Arabs with
box cutters who were getting
drunk in a strip club the night before and barely
even made it to the airport on time. Meanwhile, hit pieces against the 9/11
truth movement continue in the lead up to the fifth anniversary of the event.
A familiar emotional shell game on the part of the debunkers is to proclaim
that questioning any aspect of 9/11 disgraces the memory of the victims. This
tactic is clearly not working anymore especially in light of the fact that Bill
Doyle, representative of the largest group of 9/11 family members - says
that half now completely distrust the official version of events.
Bob McIlvaine's son Bobby was working for Merrill Lynch in the 103rd floor
of the south tower when Flight 175 struck. He was likely one of the unfortunate
individuals who obeyed the Port Authority's ridiculous order for workers to
stay in the building and not evacuate even after Flight 11 had ploughed into
the north tower.
McIlvaine is convinced that the attacks were an inside job orchestrated by
elements within the US government.
"Today, there are no ifs or buts in my mind that this was an inside
job. The US government orchestrated it with the help of MI6 and Pakistan and
Mossad. What they are telling us is bullshit. The hijackers were patsies and
Osama bin Laden was set up," McIlvaine told the London
McIlvaine has since devoted his life to educating others on what really happened
Despite the best efforts of Jewish
American Adam Yehiye Gadahn to propagandize the reality of the Al-Qaeda
myth, Americans are becoming increasingly skeptical of 9/11 and if the recent
rash of hit pieces against the 9/11 truth movement are anything to go by, the
establishment is stricken with concern.
There were another two major 9/11 semi-debunking pieces over the weekend, one
in the San
Francisco Chronicle and one in Reuters.
Expect a deluge of them for the next two weeks as the five year anniversary
comes to pass.
The most incongruous sentence from the Chronicle piece is where CIA involvement
in 9/11 is characterized as "the epitome of preposterous beliefs that start
with a conclusion and work backward to find evidence."
Wasn't it media talking heads and government officials in the hours after the
attacks who were reading off the same script and ascribing blame to Bin Laden
with no substantiating evidence? Did they then not present alleged "evidence"
to work backward to the already pre-determined conclusion? So-called evidence
that is insufficient
to federally indict Bin Laden for involvement in 9/11 five years after the
attack - despite the fact that it took less than three months to indict him
for the 1998 embassy bombings.
Read from Looking Glass News
Mystery Flight 93 - Shanksville - Donetsk - what's the difference ?
Nuts And 9/11
Conspiracy Theorists: Paranoid Fantasies About 9-11 Detract From Real Issues
Positive - Neocons & 911
a 7-Man Job
9/11 Chronicles: Destroying a Crime Scene
Have Some Holes in the Plane Stories
Nut Jobs and a Boeing 747
Pentagon Exit Hole
-- Eliminating the Impossible
Mind - Go Back To Sleep...Sweet Dreams
CRIME that Covered-up the Coup
Towers wreckage turning up all over the place
Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?
Destruction of the World Trade Center
WTC Complex Photos Highlight Bizarre Building 7 Collapse
Popular Mechanics' 9/11 Lies
reasons to question the official story of 9/11
: ON THE EVE OF DESTRUCTION
Half-Dozen Questions About 9/11 They Don't Want You to Ask
- Look Inside The 911 Smoke Plume
The Myth and the Reality
Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training
a Plane Into the World Trade Center?
Evidence that Official 9/11 Story is a Lie
1975 World Trade Center Fire
Implosion Looks Like WTC Collapse
gas tanks' demolition foreshadows Twin Towers' demolition
Animation showing military precision of flight paths
of 911 Exceeded Their Software Limits
"911" News Articles