Buildings 5 and 6, closer to towers burned throughout but did not collapse
Previously unseen photos provided to us by an annonymous rescue worker who
was at ground zero on 9/11 highlight the implausible implosion of WTC Building
7 in comparison with buildings closer to the towers that sustained significantly
more fire and debris damage yet did not collapse.
Above is a map showing the relative position of the buildings in the WTC complex.
Though Building 7 was hit by flying aircraft parts, it was not significantly effected
by the collapse of the towers due to it being shielded by buildings 5 and 6 -
which despite being closer to the towers and suffering far more extreme fires
- did not collapse.
Building 7 to the right of the picture as Building 5 burns in the left background.
From this image, which building seems the more likely to collapse? The 47 story
behemoth with limited fire in a few floors - or a nine story shell completely
engulfed by fire and flames from top to bottom? Yet it was Building 7 and not
5 that collapsed on the afternoon of September 11.
The burned out husk of Building 5 two days after 9/11. Building 5 sustained
massive damage from flaming aircraft parts which ignited fires that burned for
hours. In addition, the collapse of the north tower scraped down the side of
5 but its modest nine floors did not structurally collapse.
Here is a separate image revealing the extent of the fires in WTC
5. Despite raging infernos and debris gouging huge holes in the building,
and in comparative size significantly more severe fires than the twin towers
or Building 7 - the building stood while the other three all collapsed.
In addition, Building
6, which was even closer to the north tower (seen here moments before its
subsequent planned demolition months later), suffered even more extreme fire
and debris damage, but the building did not fall down implosion style like the
towers and Building 7.
A wider perspective shot of the rubble of Building 7. The Fiterman Hall
building and the U.S. Post Office building across the street show little damage.
Building 5 in the background is completely charred but still stands.
The rubble of WTC Building 7 lies in front of the Fiterman Hall building. The
building has fallen in its own footprint - another sign of controlled demolition
Here are a couple of shots for the no planers and 'blue screen' advocates -
aircraft engine parts and a truck designated to store them. Claiming that no
planes hit the WTC towers is damaging to the movement's credibility and it is
one of the first things that debunkers like Popular Mechanics seize upon when
building straw man hit pieces.
here to download a zip file of the complete portfolio of these images. If
you spot anything unusual that has not been fully explained please feel free
to e mail us and we will investigate.
Read from Looking Glass News
Popular Mechanics' 9/11 Lies
Towers wreckage turning up all over the place
reasons to question the official story of 9/11
Reasons to Question the Official 9/11 Story
: ON THE EVE OF DESTRUCTION
Half-Dozen Questions About 9/11 They Don't Want You to Ask
- Look Inside The 911 Smoke Plume
The Myth and the Reality
Destruction of the World Trade Center
Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training
a Plane Into the World Trade Center?
Evidence that Official 9/11 Story is a Lie
1975 World Trade Center Fire
Implosion Looks Like WTC Collapse
gas tanks' demolition foreshadows Twin Towers' demolition
Times at the Pentagon
911 Witness - Interview with April Gallop
Papers Author Daniel Ellsberg Says Government May Have Carried Out 9/11
Aicraft Registry Oddities
Pentagon eyewitness IDs Global Hawk
Flight 77 Hitting The Pentagon Would Really Look?
Animation showing military precision of flight paths
of 911 Exceeded Their Software Limits