Untitled Document
Taking a Closer Look at the Stories Ignored by the Corporate Media
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact

NEWS
All News
9-11
Corporatism
Disaster in New Orleans
Economics
Environment
Globalization
Government / The Elite
Human Rights
International Affairs
Iraq War
London Bombing
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism
Miscellaneous

COMMENTARY
All Commentaries
9-11
CIA
Corporatism
Economics
Government / The Elite
Imperialism
Iraq War
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism

SEARCH/ARCHIVES
Advanced Search
View the Archives

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly

CORPORATISM -
-

Bush Administration Twists Arms for Coke, Pepsi

Posted in the database on Wednesday, August 16th, 2006 @ 15:43:51 MST (2224 views)
by Amitabh Pal    The Progressive  

Untitled Document

The Bush Administration is acting as the muscle for Coke and Pepsi.

The two soft drink manufacturers are under fire in India after a recent report released by a respected environmental group revealed that the colas marketed in that country contain dangerous pesticides, sometimes at alarmingly high levels. (Coke and Pepsi have hotly disputed the conclusions.)

“The study finds pesticide residues in all samples; it finds a cocktail of 3-5 different pesticides in all samples—on an average 24 times higher than BIS [Bureau of Indian Standards] norms, which have been finalized but not yet notified,” the report by the New Delhi-based Center for Science and Environment notes. “The levels in some samples—for instance, Coca-Cola bought in Kolkata—exceeded the BIS standards by 140 times for the deadly pesticide Lindane. Similarly, a Coca-Cola sample manufactured in Thane contained the neurotoxin Chlorpyrifos, 200 times the standard.”

This report was a follow-up to a similar one the same organization did three years ago. At the time, the drink giants questioned the study.

But an investigation by the Indian Joint Parliamentary Committee confirmed the findings and recommended that standards be set up for the soft drink industry. The implementation of the standards has been delayed due to the usual bureaucratic dithering in India.

So, the second report was issued to galvanize public opinion on the matter, and it handsomely succeeded. Several public protests were held after the study’s release. Some Indian Members of Parliament staged a walkout over the subject. The Indian Supreme Court has given the drink manufacturers four weeks to respond to the charges and to reveal the "exact amount of harmful contents in each bottle.”

In response to the public outcry generated by the report, several Indian states have prohibited the drinks from being sold at government schools, colleges and hospitals, while one state (Kerala) has gone further, banning the drink outright. Even though India is an imperfect democracy, Indian authorities sometimes have the habit of being receptive to public concern.

Annoyingly so, in the Bush Administration’s opinion. It is warning India of the dire consequences of caring for the well-being of its people.

“This kind of action is a setback for the Indian economy,” Undersecretary for International Trade Franklin Lavin told AFP. “In a time when India is working hard to attract and retain foreign investment, it would be unfortunate if the discussion were dominated by those who did not want to treat foreign companies fairly.”

The Bush Administration should be careful about the companies it twists arms for in India. Another paragon of virtue that it intensely pressured Indian authorities on behalf of was (hold your breath!) Enron.

Enron was the prime investor in a huge power project in Western India that ran into trouble for a variety of reasons, including the overcharging that the company was engaging in (similar to its shenanigans in California). Documents reveal that Dick Cheney met in June 2001 with then-opposition leader Sonia Gandhi (whose party controlled the government of the state where the project was based) in an attempt to get Enron the $64 million that it claimed it was owed by the state administration. President Bush himself was meant to bring up the matter in a meeting with Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee. But fate intervened.

“Suddenly, the plan was scrapped,” The Guardian reports. “ ‘President Bush cannot talk about Enron,' reads an email, the sender and recipient of which have been blacked out. On the same day, 8 November [2001], Enron filed documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission revising its financial statements to account for $586m in losses. It was also the day the company decided it could no longer hide the dirty secret that it had been slushing millions of dollars to tax havens offshore, and [Kenneth] Lay called Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill to plead for help.”

Ouch!

Coke and Pepsi aren’t exactly personifications of good behavior. Coke has in recent years been accused of the murder of union leaders at a Coca-Cola bottling plant in Colombia. In India itself, Coke has faced allegations of depleting groundwater in areas where its bottling plants are based. (Coke strongly denies charges of murder at the Colombian plant, which is owned by local businessmen, and says its practices in India are environmentally sound.)

“In the past two years the Coke campaign has grown into the largest anti-corporate movement since the campaign against Nike for sweatshop abuses,” Michael Blanding writes in The Nation. “Around the world, dozens of unions and more than twenty universities have banned Coke from their facilities, while activists have dogged the company from World Cup events in London to the Winter Olympics in Torino.”

Several groups have been organizing around Coke’s depredations, two of the most prominent being killercoke.org and the India Resource Center.

Pepsi’s history is not above reproach, either. It was for years happy to do business with the hideously repressive regime in Burma before a boycott forced it to withdraw from the country in the late 1990s. And, as former New York Times reporter Stephen Kinzer’s new book, “Overthrow,” reveals, Pepsi’s CEO Donald Kendall was the one who initially broached the idea to President Nixon to overthrow Salvador Allende in Chile. “Nixon focused intensely on his warnings,” writes Kinzer. “From that moment, he never wavered in his determination to bring Allende down.”

But when you’re the Bush Administration, you don’t care about the record of corporations on issues such as democracy, public health or the environment. All you do care about is their bottom line.

_____________________________

Read from Looking Glass News

Pepsi and Coke under fire again

Coca Cola

India: Everything Gets Worse With Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola and Water - An Unsustainable Relationship

Coca-Cola Faces Mounting Pressure over Abusive Practices at Plants Worldwide

Coke: The New Nike

Soft Drinks Found to Have High Levels of Cancer Chemical

Soda Deal with Clinton Foundation Latest PR Stunt

Drink More Diet Soda, Gain More Weight?

U. of Michigan Becomes 10th College to Join Boycott of Coke

Coca-Cola Threatens Top Indian Photographer with Lawsuit

Mexican shop owner beats Coca Cola



Go to Original Article >>>

The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly




Untitled Document
Disclaimer
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact
Copyright 2005 Looking Glass News.