Sipping on a bottle of water and holding a book about the history and
future of Islam, Kevin Barrett ticked off a few examples of what he saw as evidence
that the Sept. 11 attacks had been an “inside job.”
As children zoomed by on tricycles and shot basketballs at a community
center near his home, Mr. Barrett, 47, described how some news orgainzations
(the French daily newspaper Figaro and Radio France International, in fact)
had reported that an agent from the Central Intelligence Agency visited with
Osama bin Laden two months before the attacks. He also said fires could not
have caused the collapse of the World Trade Center towers at free-fall speed,
as reported by the special Sept. 11 commission. “The 9/11 report will
be universally reviled as a sham and a cover-up very soon,” said Mr. Barrett,
who has been a teacher’s assistant or lecturer on Islam, African literature
and other subjects at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, since 1996. “The
9/11 commission has its conspiracy theory, and we have ours.”
Mr. Barrett’s views, which he described on a conservative radio talk
show in June, have outraged some Wisconsin legislators and generated a fierce
debate about academic freedom on a campus long known as a haven for progressive
ideologies and student activism.
“They apparently have no limits to what can be taught in the classroom,”
Representative Steve Nass said of the university’s decision to allow Mr.
Barrett to teach a class this fall titled “Islam: Religion and Culture.”
“Barrett has got to go,’’ Mr. Nass, a Whitewater Republican,
said. “It is an embarrassment for the state of Wisconsin. It is an embarrassment
for the university.”
The week of July 24, Mr. Nass, who is up for re-election this year, sent a
resolution signed by 61 state legislators — all but one of them Republican
— to Gov. James E. Doyle, a Democrat, and university officials condemning
Mr. Barrett’s “academically dishonest views” and demanding
that his one-semester contract to teach the class for a salary of $8,247 be
Mr. Barrett, a co-founder of a group called Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance
for 9/11 Truth, argued that he had never presented his personal opinions in
class and that he was free to offer those opinions on his own time outside the
“Why is liberal Wisconsin going bananas over an $8,000-a-year lecturer
who’s not even teaching his own views in the course?” Mr. Barrett
asked. “I go out of my way to bring in diverse interpretations for students
to look at.”
The university’s chancellor, John D. Wiley, said that he was baffled
by Mr. Barrett’s beliefs but that they were irrelevant in the classroom,
where he must stick to a syllabus that has been approved by the department.
That syllabus includes a week devoted to the war on terror.
A 10-day university review had determined that Mr. Barrett presented a variety
of viewpoints and that he had not discussed his personal opinions in the classroom,
Mr. Wiley said.
“I think it would be a serious mistake for legislators to try to get
in and micromanage curriculum,” said Mr. Wiley, who added that university
officials would keep an eye on Mr. Barrett by meeting with him throughout the
semester. “We don’t go around and question all our instructors to
find out what all their views are.”
At the University of Colorado, a committee voted in June to fire Ward L. Churchill,
an ethnic studies professor who had compared some victims of the Sept. 11 attacks
to a Nazi official. Professor Churchill appealed this month to keep his job.
And early this year at Northwestern University, Arthur R. Butz, a tenured professor
of engineering, drew strong criticism after saying he agreed with the belief
of the president of Iran that the Holocaust was a myth.
Patrick V. Farrell, the provost of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, said
the university was not foc