Untitled Document
The Bush administration is expected to soon announce a new national space policy
that will give the Pentagon the green light to move toward deployment of offensive
weapons in space.
The new directive could allow deployment of lasers in space; attack vehicles
that descend on targets from space; killer satellites, which would disrupt or
destroy other nation's satellites; and tungsten rods fired from space platforms
that would gather speeds of over 7,000 mph and be able to penetrate underground
targets.
In the Air Force Space Command's Strategic Master Plan, FY06 and Beyond, the
military said, "Our vision calls for prompt global strike space systems
with the capability to apply force from or through space against terrestrial
targets. International treaties and laws do not prohibit the use or presence
of conventional weapons in space."
There was once a treaty that limited the research, development, testing and
deployment of such offensive space systems. It was called the 1972 Anti-Ballistic
Missile (ABM) Treaty with Russia. Once in office, George W. Bush withdrew the
U.S. from the treaty and moved forward with expanded research and development
on offensive space weapons.
The 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq was largely coordinated from space. Over 70%
of the weapons used in the war were guided to their targets by military satellites.
Thus the Pentagon maintains that the U.S. must "deny" other nations
the use of space in order to maintain "full spectrum dominance."
In order to sell this space warfare program to the American people, the Pentagon
has labeled it "missile defense." But in reality the program is all
about offensive engagement and was first spelled out in the 1997 Space Command
plan, Vision for 2020, that called for U.S. "control and domination"
of space.
The Pentagon and its aerospace corporation allies understand that they cannot
come to the American people and ask for hundreds of billions of dollars for
offensive weapons in space. Thus the claim of "missile defense." The
U.S. has to date spent well over $130 billion on Star Wars research and development.
The budget for military-related space activity in 2003 was $18 billion and is
expected to top $25 billion a year by 2010.
With growing budget deficits in the U.S., Congress will have to drastically
cut needed programs like Medicare, Medicaid, education, and environmental clean-up
in order to pay the growing cost of space weapons technology.
The world has become reliant on satellites for cell phones, cable TV, ATM bank
machines and the like. Space debris is already a problem as space shuttles have
had windshields cracked by bits of paint orbiting the Earth at enormous speeds.
Imagine what would happen if the U.S. began destroying satellites in space,
creating massive amounts of orbiting space junk, that made access to space virtually
impossible for everyone.
For the last several years the Space Command, headquartered in Colorado Springs,
held a computer simulation space war game set in the year 2017. The game pitted
the "Blues" (U.S.) against the "Reds" (China). In the war
game the U.S. launched a preemptive first strike attack against China using
the military space plane (called Global Strike). Armed with a half-ton of precision-guided
munitions the space plane would fly down from orbit and strike anywhere in the
world in 45 minutes.
It is easy to see why Canada, Russia, and China have repeatedly gone to the
United Nations asking the U.S. to join them in negotiating a new global ban
on weapons in space. Why not close the door to the barn before the horse gets
out? So far the U.S., during both the Clinton and Bush administrations, refuses
to even discuss the idea of a new space treaty.
Gen. Lance Lord, head of the Air Force Space Command, recently told Congress,
"Space superiority is not our birthright, but it is our destiny."
The idea that the U.S. is destined to rule the Earth and space militarily needs
to be debated by the citizens of our nation. Not only is this a provocative
notion, it is also one that will lead to a massive waste of our hard-earned
tax dollars and create a dangerous new arms race. Do we really want war in the
heavens?
Bruce K. Gagnon is Coordinator of the Global Network Against Weapons &
Nuclear Power in Space. He can be reached at: globalnet@mindspring.com