For more examples of posters click
neocon blogger and concentration camp advocate, has posted a spate of converted
WWII posters on her site, taking the New York Times to task for reporting the
news, albeit a year late.
According to Malkin and New York representative Peter King, the New York Times
stands accused of treason “for reporting last week about a secret financial-monitoring
program used to trace alleged terrorists” and disclosing “a secret
domestic wiretapping program,” according to CBC
News, never mind both programs violate the spirit and the letter of the
Constitution. “No one elected The New York Times to do anything,”
King told the New
York Daily News. “They’re breaking the law to satisfy their
own arrogant, liberal agenda.”
In Bushzarro world, newspapers are “elected” to report the news.
If newspapers report the trashing of the Constitution, this is treason. In Malkin’s
world, it follows that traitors should be thrown in concentration camps, especially
if they resemble in any way Arabs or Muslims.
It would seem Mr. King and Malkin suffer from memory loss. It was Judith Miller’s
“arrogant, liberal agenda” that brought us the neocon lies about
illusory Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. As Antony
Loewenstein writes for the Sydney Morning Herald, the “vast majority
of [Miller’s] WMD claims came through Ahmed Chalabi, an indicted fraudster
and one of the leading figures in the Iraqi National Congress (INC), the group
keen to militarily overthrow Saddam. Miller relied on untested defectors’
testimonies (usually provided by Chalabi) to write several front-page stories
on this information,” stories that did not pass the smell test at the
time and have found the memory hole since.
Ahmed Chalabi, convicted bank fraudster installed as a deputy prime minister
in Iraq, was a neocon darling. His Iraqi National Congress, created by the CIA,
was the primary source of Judith Miller’s “journalism.” In
short, Judith Miller was a hack for the neocons, thus making the New York Times
a neocon conduit for lies and propaganda.
Even though the New York Times serves as a shameless shill for the “arrogant,
liberal agenda” of the neocons, this does not change the fact the newspaper
is protected under both the First Amendment and statutory procedure (see the
Supreme Court case, Bartnicki
v. Vopper). In 1971, the Supreme Court ruled in a per curiam decision that
prior restraint (censorship) was not warranted in a government effort to stop
the New York Times from publishing the Pentagon Papers. “There’s
a tone of gleeful relish in the way they [the Bush neocons] talk about dragging
reporters before grand juries, their appetite for withholding information, and
the hints that reporters who look too hard into the public’s business
risk being branded traitors,” Bill
Keller, New York Times Executive Editor, told the Washington Post.
King and Malkin, of course, have nothing but contempt for Supreme Court rulings.
It is irrelevant that NSA whistleblower Russell Tice (the source behind revelations
published in the New York Times) is protected by federal law. King and Malkin
believe the unitary decider and his Machiavellian operatives have the right
to look through your financial, medical, and library records, listen in on your
telephone calls, read your email, and sneak and peek your computer hard drive
and while they’re at it rifle through your underwear drawer because “we
are at war” with an enemy never sufficiently documented or designated,
an enemy who worked for the CIA in Afghanistan and is not specifically “wanted
in connection” with the nine eleven attacks, as his FBI
wanted poster reveals.
Obviously, King and Malkin, and the whole of the neocon choir, believe the
phony “war on terror,” rechristened the “long war”—i.e.,
it will last a century or more, or long enough to provide obscene profits for
the death merchants—gives the “permanent revolution” Jacobins
the right to trash the Constitution.
Quite naturally, this brings to mind Hitler’s Ermächtigungsgesetz,
or Enabling Act, an element of the Reichstag Fire Decree nullifying the civil
liberties of German citizens after the Reichstag was torched (a fire planned
by Goebbels and executed by Göring, according to SA man Karl
Bush, not unlike Hitler, feels he has the authority to by-pass Congress
(mostly corporate purchased whores, so this is a moot point) and use the Constitution
as a doormat where the unitary decider wipes off his shoes, mucky with the blood
a few hundred thousand Iraqis.
Read from Looking Glass News
New York Times writes history
Scoops: Every Night the "NY Times" and "Wash Post" Exchange
Front Pages for the Following Day
Troika: Bush, Nuclear Power Industry and the New York Times
York Times admits it held domestic spying story for a full year
BEARING GIFTS: Paul Krugman at the New York Times and Clinton FEMA Director
James Lee Witt Leading America Into the Next Slaughter
Big Shots at NBC and New York Times 'Hush Hush And Evasive' About Why WTC Janitor
Story Never Appeared...
Walter, Philanthropist and 9/11 Truth-Seeker, Returns from Europe to Picket
Outside New York Times Building in Week-Long Protest of Media Censorship