Untitled Document
Taking a Closer Look at the Stories Ignored by the Corporate Media
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact

NEWS
All News
9-11
Corporatism
Disaster in New Orleans
Economics
Environment
Globalization
Government / The Elite
Human Rights
International Affairs
Iraq War
London Bombing
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism
Miscellaneous

COMMENTARY
All Commentaries
9-11
CIA
Corporatism
Economics
Government / The Elite
Imperialism
Iraq War
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism

SEARCH/ARCHIVES
Advanced Search
View the Archives

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly

ECONOMICS -
-

The corporations that prey on the undocumented

Posted in the database on Thursday, June 01st, 2006 @ 19:26:42 MST (2153 views)
by Amy Muldoon    Socialist Worker Online  

Untitled Document

AMY MULDOON explains how major corporations take advantage of immigrants--both legal and undocumented.

STOCK VIDEO footage of desperate migrants climbing fences or wading the Rio Grande runs on every TV news program about the immigration “crisis.” The guest-worker program that is part of the final version of immigration legislation approved by the Senate would alleviate this “crisis” by creating a perfect marriage of companies that simply can’t afford to pay higher wages and low-skilled workers looking for jobs.

Or so the rhetoric goes. The reality is different.

Many major U.S. businesses stand to gain tremendously from a guest-worker program because it will allow them to proceed legally with what they have been doing to this point illegally.

Though the mainstream media prefers to limit its coverage to the migrants--and sometimes the “coyotes” who smuggle them across the border--the truth is that some of the biggest names in Corporate America have gone to great lengths to fill low-wage jobs with undocumented workers, turning to smuggling and forgery themselves if necessary.

Greg Denier of the United Food and Commercial Workers union reports that many companies place ads in newspapers and on radio stations in nearby countries--and then hire agents to recruit workers and transportation companies to carry them. “This is not a situation of workers sitting on the other side of the border looking to come and take American jobs,” Denier told In These Times. “These workers are lured here with false promises and high hopes.”

In 2001, in the largest-ever such case against an employer, Tyson Foods was indicted on 36 charges of conspiracy to recruit and transport undocumented workers from Mexico to 15 of its 57 plants across the country.

The explicit purpose of the program was to improve productivity. The government’s case included testimony that a Tyson executive’s response to poor production at the Shelbyville, Tenn., plant was the comment, “That plant needs more Mexicans.”

A two-year investigation by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS, since renamed the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE) charged that Tyson’s management aided and abetted the falsification of documents and paid smugglers $100 to $200 per head for workers--who were picked up by Tyson’s transporters just inside the U.S. border. The INS estimated almost a third of Tyson’s 120,000 employees to be undocumented.

The trial found Tyson not guilty of creating a culture of lawbreaking, but not before two managers pleaded guilty and a third killed himself.

In an even stranger travesty of justice, the INS raided Nebraska Beef’s Omaha plant in 2000, rounding up and deporting some 200 workers. When the company was charged with recruiting foreign workers to work illegally and providing false documentation, a judge threw out the case. Why? Lack of witnesses--most were now in Mexico.

Other sectors of the economy have seen similar schemes. In a 1999 case, Filiberto’s--an Arizona chain of Mexican restaurants--settled out of court after admitting to smuggling workers and falsifying documents following raids that rounded up 200 undocumented workers.

Fines aren’t much of an incentive to stop breaking the law where there is money to be made.

Wal-Mart--which never met a labor law it didn’t break--was fined $11 million for employing undocumented cleaners, some of whom were locked overnight in stores and paid no overtime. In 2004, the company took in more than $288 billion in revenue.

In their defenses, both Tyson and Wal-Mart used the tried-and-true corporate logic that they shouldn’t be penalized for what their subcontractors--in this case, hiring agencies--are guilty of. Ironically, Tyson didn’t deny using hiring agencies that recruit foreign workers--but claimed that they assumed all hires were legal.

The final version of the Senate immigration bill passed last week also calls for stiffer penalties for corporations that hire undocumented workers. But this is hot air. In the entire 2005 fiscal year, a whopping two cases were initiated against employers by ICE.

The government isn’t a neutral arbiter in these cases, either. The Tysons are major campaign donors, especially to Bill and Hillary Clinton and their friends in the Democratic Party. Tyson was fined for giving “illegal gifts” to Clinton Agriculture Secretary Mike Espy, and Hillary Clinton made $100,000 on shady cattle deals through Tyson during the late 1970s. Tyson continues to hold U.S. government contracts worth more than $200 million a year.

Men and women working without legal status have always had the threat of deportation hanging over them, but the old system could lead to recrimination against management. A guest-worker program would keep migrant workers dependent on employers, but undercut the threat of fines or lawsuits against the bosses themselves.

Guest-worker legislation would also help employers recruit undocumented workers--the federal government would basically become an international temp agency in the service of Corporate America.

Industries like meatpacking need a constant stream of fresh--and desperate--labor. Meatpacking today has the lowest wages, highest turnover (100 percent a year), and highest injury rate of any sector of manufacturing. Less than a third of workers are unionized.

Employers have worked very hard to establish this situation, and guest-worker legislation with three-year limited visas fits their need for a disposable workforce perfectly.

Guest-worker legislation legitimizes the idea that some jobs are too dirty or dangerous for Americans, so Corporate America is justified filling them any way they can. We need a labor movement that says no worker is disposable--and fights for justice, dignity and safety for all.



Go to Original Article >>>

The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly




Untitled Document
Disclaimer
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact
Copyright 2005 Looking Glass News.