Untitled Document
Headline in the New
York Times:
Anti-U.S. Rioting Erupts in
Kabul; at Least 14 Dead |
Not "killed." Just "dead." As if their demise had
occured from old age, or natural causes like an earthquake.
The article does its best to reinforce the headline. The first paragraph quite
literally treats the riot as if it were an earthquake or a brush fire:
A deadly traffic accident caused by a United States military
convoy quickly touched off a full-blown antiAmerican riot on Monday
that raged across much of the Afghan capital, leaving at least 14
people dead and scores injured.
|
The second paragraph provides the American cover story: "the United States
military said only that warning shots had been fired in the air." Not until
the sixth paragraph do we get the rebuttal to that spin, which comes from the
actual facts:
It became clear the American military and the Afghan police
and army had used their weapons to try to disperse the crowds. Scores
of people were treated in hospitals for gunshot wounds.
|
But even that is quickly forgotten. The very next paragraph interviews a doctor
and talks about the actual dead people, but fails to mention how
they died, leaving the thought that, although "scores were treated for
gunshot wounds," perhaps the actual deaths were due to being trampled by
a crowd or something else.
Fourteen people didn't just "die" in Afghanistan. They were killed
by U.S. and/or Afghan troops.
Meanwhile, in the actions which are actually acknowledged as "killing,"
yet
another air strike today in southern Afghanistan killed another 50 alleged
Taliban, bringing the death toll from such attacks in just the last two weeks
to more than 420. How many of those were actually Taliban, and how many innocent
civilians, will surely never be known.
______________________
US skates on thin ice in Afghanistan
By qrswave
The
Truth Will Set You Free
Some advice for Congress: GET OUT NOW - before it's too late.
Violent
anti-foreigner protests raged across the capital Monday after a U.S. military
truck crashed into traffic, touching off the worst rioting since the Taliban's
ouster. At least eight people died and 107 were injured before Kabul's streets
calmed.
Others put the number dead at much higher.
By
the end of the day at least 14 people were dead and more than 90 injured,
hospital officials said. It was the bloodiest day in the capital since the
fall of the Taliban in late 2001.
Chanting "Death to America," rioters stoned the U.S. convoy
involved in the accident then headed to the center of town, ransacking
offices of international aid groups and searching for foreigners in a display
of rising resentment over civilian deaths in the war against insurgents.
Gunfire, at times intense, rang out across Kabul as hundreds of young men
looted shops and set fire to police cars and station houses. Some people said
U.S. and Afghan troops fired on the crowds. Officials said
they couldn't say whether that happened.
In other words, they did.
The U.S.-backed Afghan government decreed a nighttime curfew and the city
quieted before sunset. Yousuf Stanezai, an Interior Ministry spokesman, warned
that anyone found outside between 10 p.m and 4 a.m. would suffer "serious
measures."
Spreading freedom and democracy, alright - at the barrel of a gun.
President Hamzid Karzai went on television Monday night to decry the outburst,
branding the rioters as troublemakers who should be resisted and
linking their violence to the long years of conflict that wrecked Afghanistan.
"We will recognize as the enemy of Afghanistan these people
who do these things," Karzai said. "You should stand up against
these agitators and not let them to destroy our country again."
Who does this joker think he's kidding?
He expects ordinary Afghanis to recognize ordinary Afghanis as the enemy of
Afghanistan?
Of course, that would leave only foreigners as friends. But then technically,
once every Afghani is eliminated and only foreigners remain, what's left really
isn't Afghanistan - is it now?
Patience with the 23,000 U.S. soldiers and other foreign troops in Afghanistan
is fraying over recent deaths of civilians, including at least 16 people killed
by an airstrike targeting Taliban fighters in a village last week.
"We don't want Americans in our country. They don't care about
poor people. [NOT EVEN AMERICA'S POOR] They killed innocent people today and
this
is not the first time," said Abdul Shakoor, a 28-year-old who joined
in the protests after Monday's traffic accident. "They do it
all the time and in the end they say it was a mistake. It's not acceptable
to us anymore."
"This was a tragic incident and we deeply regret any deaths or injuries
resulting from this incident," a U.S. military spokesman, Col. Thomas
Collins, said in a statement.
The rioting spread from the accident site in northern Kabul to the center
of the city, where hundreds of Afghan soldiers and NATO peacekeepers in tanks
deployed.
Chanting protesters marched on the presidential palace and rioters smashed
police guard boxes, set fire to police cars and ransacked buildings, including
the compound of the aid group CARE International.
An AP reporter saw demonstrators pull a man who appeared to be a Westerner
from a civilian vehicle and beat him. The man escaped and ran to a line of
police, who fired gunshots over the heads of the demonstrators.
Some protesters said they were targeting non-Afghans.
"Today's demonstration is because Americans killed innocent
people. We will not stop until foreigners leave the city. We
are looking for foreigners to kill," said one protester, Gulam
Ghaus.
"Recent attacks on civilians in southern Afghanistan and today's firing
on people in Kabul show that Americans consider the whole Afghan nation
as their enemies," said Mohammed Hanif, who contacted an AP
reporter in Pakistan by satellite phone from an undisclosed location.
That basically echoes Karzai the Clown's statement.
Things are going to get very ugly in Afghanistan. Congress better pull our
troops out before what happened to Russia, happens to US.
Go to Original Article >>>
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.
|