Intended to create circus of interest around 'no plane' theories, later
Grainy video stills showing what is claimed to be the nose cone of Flight 77
will only result in an increased circus of debate around the issue of what happened
at the Pentagon in preparation for a future release of clear video footage that
'debunks' people who question the official version of 9/11.
For over four years we have remained neutral on the subject, agreeing that
unanswered questions need to be explored but warning against the Pentagon issue
becoming the core focus of the 9/11 truth movement.
The danger is clearly that the government will use its media mouthpieces in
particular Fox News to hype this until it becomes the de facto keystone of alternative
explanations behind 9/11.
At the point when that crescendo reaches its peak crystal clear footage of
Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon will be released, knocking down the straw man
argument that the establishment itself erected.
The government is steam valving this issue so as to garner as much interest
as possible before blowing the entire matter out of the water. We know for a
fact that the FBI seized the gas station camera footage and footage from hotels
across the highway which would show the entire sequence of events and prove
exactly what happened at the Pentagon.
The fact that they have again chosen to release grainy and foggy images which
only lead to more speculation tell us two things.
1) The government truly is frightened to death of releasing
any images which accurately depict what happened at the Pentagon because it
doesn't jive with the official version of 9/11.
2) Or the government knows that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon
and has clear footage of the incident, but is deliberately releasing these speculative
images in order to stoke the debate so it can later release the high quality
video and use it to debunk the entire 9/11 truth movement.
The media obsession with this one facet of an entire smorgasbord of 9/11 questions,
and their refusal to address more hardcore 9/11 evidence, leads us to fear the
latter explanation is the case.
Why no discussion of Building
7 and the comments of Larry Silverstein?
Why no discussion of the hijackers being trained
by the US government? Lt.
Colonel Steve Butler of the Monterey Defense Language Institute was suspended
from duty after he accused Bush of allowing 9/11 to happen.
Why no discussion of the NORAD
Because none of these issues are honey pots, none of them are speculation because
the cards are laid out on the table for everyone to see and the evidence is
While intelligent questions need to be asked about what really happened at
the Pentagon we feel that research in this context should come with the proviso
that a potential trap is being laid to discredit all 9/11 research at a later
date, and that today's story is part of that process.