Education in America has done a fine job. “Despite nearly constant
news coverage since the war there began in 2003, 63 percent of Americans aged
18 to 24 failed to correctly locate the country on a map of the Middle East.
Seventy percent could not find Iran or Israel,” reports National Geographic.
“Young Americans just don’t seem to have much interest in the world
outside of the U.S.,” mused David Rutherford, a specialist in geography
education at the National Geographic
Society in Washington. Young Americans are so ill-educated, half of them can’t
find New York on a map, let alone Iran and Iraq. “Many young Americans
also lack basic map-reading skills…. Told they could escape an approaching
hurricane by evacuating to the northwest, only two-thirds could indicate which
way northwest is on a map.” But it is not simply geography.
“Three in ten respondents put the U.S. population between one and two
billion (it’s just under 300 million, according the U.S. Census Bureau).
Seventy-four percent said English is the most commonly spoken native language
in the world (it’s Mandarin Chinese).” Considering the widespread
ignorance of the American public—and older Americans are not much better
when it comes to finding countries on a map, or for that matter naming their
state representative—it makes perfect sense a gaggle of neocons, espousing
what amounts to fascist authoritarianism, were able to capture the government,
invade two countries in six years, and now threaten to attack a third.
Taylor Gatto writes, “the once mighty reading Samson of America was
led eyeless to Gaza with the rest of the slaves.” Gatto points out a few
astounding facts. “Looking back, abundant data exist from states like
Connecticut and Massachusetts to show that by 1840 the incidence of complex
literacy in the United States was between 93 and 100 percent wherever such a
thing mattered,” writes Gatto, a former New York teacher of the year.
According to the Connecticut census of 1840, only one citizen out of every
579 was illiterate and you probably don’t want to know, not really,
what people in those days considered literate; it’s too embarrassing.
Popular novels of the period give a clue: Last of the Mohicans, published
in 1826, sold so well that a contemporary equivalent would have to move 10
million copies to match it. If you pick up an uncut version you find yourself
in a dense thicket of philosophy, history, culture, manners, politics, geography,
analysis of human motives and actions, all conveyed in data-rich periodic
sentences so formidable only a determined and well-educated reader can handle
it nowadays. Yet in 1818 we were a small-farm nation without colleges or universities
to speak of. Could those simple folk have had more complex minds than our
Dictatorship and despotism thrive when ignorance and stupidity rule
societies. “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a
state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be,” Thomas
Jefferson declared in 1816. At the time, the populace of America understood
the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the
people, not the government. Americans read and comprehended the Preamble of
the Constitution, where specific tasks are assigned to government. In the early
19th century, John Locke’s “liberal” philosophy of natural
rights (universal rights derived from natural law) inspired and guided many
Americans. Now most Americans follow the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes, although
they have no idea of Hobbes or what he wrote about government. Hobbes believed
that sovereignty was vested in the state. As an example of the Hobbesian state,
consider that most Americans believe only the government may grant “civil
rights,” when in fact rights are natural, much like the physical laws
of nature, and inalienable, that is to say the government cannot take them away.
In 1810, an editorialist for the Portland
Gazette and Maine Advertiser wrote in response to Napoleon Bonaparte’s
banning of printing presses: “When people are … determined to be
ignorant, what is the use of printing? When a man is determined that he will
not receive information, it is of very little use to lay it before him….
You may talk to him, and print for him, he will still be ignorant…. An
ignorant man is easily led astray—he envies the man of enlightened mind,
and would sooner vote for an unprincipled blockhead, than an honest and upright
man of talents and learning. This kind of system leads to riot and anarchy—anarchy
leads to absolute despotism, and ignorance fits the people to bear that despotism.”
In Napoleon’s time, “prefects of departments and special censors”
micromanaged news and information. Now we have the corporate media releasing
select government propaganda to masses dumbed-down by decades of public education.
Many people are functionally illiterate and unable to navigate the written language.
Knowing the characters of American Idol is more important than knowing the names
of state representatives. In such a fetid environment, tyranny grows quite naturally
and unopposed—and thanks to the corporate media and state administered
education, most people do not know their country is now a dictatorship, or dangerously
close to this condition, and the situation will be nearly complete after our
Napoleon and his minions ban the equivalent of the printing press.
Of course, for our neolib rulers and their bankster handlers, widespread ignorance—especially
ignorance of geography and, more importantly, igorance of the concepts of our
one-time constitutional republic—is the preferred state of existence,
for chattel unenlightened make for better slaves. As George Orwell wrote in
his dystopian novel, 1984, the state depends on ignorance and fear to control
the masses, who are of course the ultimate enemy:
At this moment, for example, in 1984 (if it was 1984), Oceania was at war
with Eurasia and in alliance with Eastasia. In no public or private utterance
was it ever admitted that the three powers had at any time been grouped along
different lines. Actually, as Winston well knew, it was only four years since
Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and in alliance with Eurasia. But that
was merely a piece of furtive knowledge which he happened to possess because
his memory was not satisfactorily under control. Officially the change of
partners had never happened. Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania
had always been at war with Eurasia. The enemy of the moment always represented
absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with him
Go to Original Article >>>
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.