Untitled Document
Taking a Closer Look at the Stories Ignored by the Corporate Media
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact

NEWS
All News
9-11
Corporatism
Disaster in New Orleans
Economics
Environment
Globalization
Government / The Elite
Human Rights
International Affairs
Iraq War
London Bombing
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism
Miscellaneous

COMMENTARY
All Commentaries
9-11
CIA
Corporatism
Economics
Government / The Elite
Imperialism
Iraq War
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism

SEARCH/ARCHIVES
Advanced Search
View the Archives

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly

9-11 -
-

Hollywood Profits Off 911 Misery And Death With Flight 93 Movie, Failing To Question Bogus Government Story

Posted in the database on Sunday, April 30th, 2006 @ 16:05:28 MST (2084 views)
by Greg Szymanski    The Arctic Beacon  

Untitled Document

According to activist Phil Jayhan, the movie should be considered a fictional account just like the entire government story about 911.

The propaganda movie, flight 93, opened this weekend across the country, as Hollywood now gets in line to profit off the misery, tragedy and death of 911without even attempting to question the veracity of the government's official story.

"How shameless, greedy and arrogant can you get? It's sinful," said Phil Jayhan, a 911 truth seeking activist, traveling the country on what he calls his "911 Jay Walking National Tour."

Jayhan is now in Chattanooga, Tennessee, making his way to Washington D.C. with a two-prong mission to first interview people, showing them with video evidence how simple it is to prove the government story is based on lies. And next to compile his information into a video about the suppressed story of the truth behind 911.

"I am not quite sure why there is such a push in the media and Hollywood to help push government propaganda about 911," said Jayhan. "Now it's Flight 93 and next we will see Oliver Stone's effort, but both stories fail to address the real issues about government complicity in 911.

Jayhan has been a long time 911 truth advocate, starting a highly controversial web site in the early days after the WTC attacks when it was not fashionable to criticize the government.

And in a truth movement filled with disinformation artists and FBI-funded infiltrators, Jayhan is one of the good guys, trying to alert people of the real facts behind 911 and trying to inform people in the face of a complicit media not dealing with the truth.

For Jayhan's efforts, he has been put on numerous government watch lists and subjected to countless internet harassments. But through it all, those who have followed his work, say he has enlightened and informed millions of Americans and people around the world about the U.S. government cover-up about 911 through his web site at www.letsroll911.org.

Besides in the being in the middle of his nationwide tour, Jayhan is not pleased about the Flight 93 the movie being represented as a factual account then what he claims it really is: fiction and government propaganda.

"We are up against a huge propaganda machine, but there are millions of people who know and understand the truth, realizing in their hearts the government was involved in the mass murder of more than 3,000 people on 911," said Jayhan.

Trying to level the playing field in his own way, Jayhan wrote an article in 2004, showing hw the government lied about what really happened on 911. Here is the article which appeared on his web site by someone called the "surgeon" based on the article Jayhan initially wrote:

There is overwhelming physical evidence that Flight 93 did not crash at Shanksville, Pennsylvania on 9/11. Coupled with circumstantial and documentary evidence, plus the numerous government cover-ups and conflicting stories, lends credence to this allegation. What is crystal clear is that the official story concerning Flight 93 is a blatant lie.

To prove this to yourself, research the history of the official story: at first, it was "brave passengers took over the plane and crashed it to save Washington, DC"; then the story was changed to "the hijackers crashed the plane". No new evidence was uncovered or discovered that would require a change in the story. Only when the passengers' families demanded to listen to the cockpit voice recording did the story change. However, the cockpit voice recording is bogus - there was no Flight 93 crash.

Lack of Aircraft Debris

The key evidence that the official story of Flight 93 is a complete lie is the missing Boeing 757 at the "crash site" in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. A Boeing 757-200 weighs +120,000 lbs (+54,000 kg) empty, has a length of 155 ft 3 in (47.3 m), wingspan of 124 ft 10 in (38 m) and a tail height of 44 ft 6 in (13.6 m). All of the eyewitnesses to the crash scene, which included firemen, were amazed that there was no evidence of the plane. There was a lot of small debris and paper, but 120,000 lbs of aircraft apparently disappeared. According to the official story, the one-time open pit mine had been filled with soft dirt which "liquefied" when the plane hit. The entire plane buried itself deeply in the ground. However, note the imprint of the tail. It is not very deep and there is no evidence of any debris from the tail.

The Faked Crash Imprint

The second key piece of evidence is the shape of the impact crater, or the crash imprint. The official story is that the 757 was at an extremely low altitude (less than 500 feet or 150 meters), the plane rolled onto its back and crashed at +500 mph (800 kmh). The crash imprint shows a vertical, or nearly vertical, impact. It is impossible for a 757 to change from horizontal flight a to vertical dive within a few hundred vertical feet - particularly when its at twice its' design speed for low altitude. Further, the all-electronic control systems of Boeing 757s have pre-set software limits that prevents pilots from making dangerous maneuvers: such as inverted flight or vertical dives. The crash imprint and lack of debris and fire damage outside the crater could only have been caused by a vertical, or near vertical crash. And this was not possible.

The Circular Crater

The third item evidence is the circular crater. Note that it is off-center of the tail imprint. If this crater were caused by the fuselage, it should be directly under the tail imprint. If the plane crashed at an angle, with one wing striking before the other, the crater could be off-center - however, the tail imprint would be larger. The circular crater is indicative of a below ground explosion.

Grass Growing in the Crater

The fourth piece of evidence is the grass and weeds growing in the areas where the "wing tips" and "tail assembly" imprinted the ground. Grass and vegetation is also seen growing on the sides of the burning crater walls! This grass must be the same as the PentaLawn grass, which is able to grow back within immediately after plane crashes. Clearly, the crash crater was made before 9/11 - long enough for grass to grow.

Lack of Fire Damage

The fifth piece of evidence that the official government story is a lie is the lack of fire damage. A Boeing 757 has a fuel capacity of 11,489 gal (43,490 l). Flight 93 was full for its planned cross country trip to California and would have had more than 9,000 gal (34,000 l) when it crashed. To put this inperspective, this amount of fuel would fill 500 automobiles. There is almost no fire damage outside the crash crater and that is only in the nearby woods.

The Mushroom Cloud

The sixth item of evidence is the picture taken moments after the crash which shows a relatively small mushroom cloud of smoke with a narrow base. There is no extended smoke base which would be typical of aircraft crash. It is indicative of high explosive.

The Missing Three Minutes

The government asserts that Flight 93 crashed at 10:03 AM. A seismic recording station recorded a major event at 10:06 AM. Seismic recordings are calibrated by atomic clocks which are incredibly accurate. Cleveland Air Traffic Control also had the flight on its radar at 10:06 AM. Again, the government story contradicts physical evidence. While this does not provide any proof that Flight 93 did not crash, it does illustrate government complicity.

Evidence Summary

To summarize, the physical evidence does not show that a Boeing 757-200 crashed at Shanksville: o Amount of debris not consistent with a +120,000 lb aircraft

o Crash imprint could only be caused by a vertical, or near vertical crash, which was not possible

o Circular crater indicative of a below ground explosion

o Grass and weeds are growing in the crater which clearly indicates the crater was made before 9/11 o Lack of fire damage

o Mushroom cloud not consistent with 9,000 gallons of fuel exploding and burning

o The three minute discrepancy

o Flight 93: of the 45 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 6 are listed in the SSDI (13%)Of these 45 people, none are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list: None.

Flight 93, no crash. No "Lets Roll"

What Probably Happened at Shanksville

As the 757 flew over the crash site, pre-planted explosives (remember this is a former mine) were detonated creating the central crater. This caused the mushroom cloud in the photo. The wing and tail imprints were dug in advance, plus some of the central crater, long enough for grass to grow. Aircraft debris, paper and fuel were pre-planted and blown out by the explosives.

What happened to the plane and its passengers? We don't know. There is some evidence, as presented by the researcher woody box, that Flight 93 landed at Cleveland-Hopkins airport.

Other Oddities and Coincidences

There are numerous other oddities and coincidences concerning Flight 93: ranging from terror drills at nearby airports to debris found miles away at two separate locations. Further, a C-130H cargo plane saw Flight 77 crash into the Pentagon, continued on its journey to Minneapolis; was at the Flight 93 crash site and continued on its journey. Plus, the impossible cell phone calls, the political and corporate connections to the land where Flight 93 crashed and much, much more.

Greg Szymanski also has his own daily show on the Republic Broadcast Network. Go to www.rbnlive.com Greg Szymanski is an independent investigative journalist and his articles can been seen at www.LewisNews.com. He also writes for American Free Press and has his own site www.arcticbeacon.com



Go to Original Article >>>

The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly




Untitled Document
Disclaimer
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact
Copyright 2005 Looking Glass News.