Untitled Document
Taking a Closer Look at the Stories Ignored by the Corporate Media
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact

NEWS
All News
9-11
Corporatism
Disaster in New Orleans
Economics
Environment
Globalization
Government / The Elite
Human Rights
International Affairs
Iraq War
London Bombing
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism
Miscellaneous

COMMENTARY
All Commentaries
9-11
CIA
Corporatism
Economics
Government / The Elite
Imperialism
Iraq War
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism

SEARCH/ARCHIVES
Advanced Search
View the Archives

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly

9-11 -
-

"United 93" Promotes 9/11 Govt Conspiracy Theory

Posted in the database on Friday, April 28th, 2006 @ 18:07:50 MST (2332 views)
by Nico Haupt    Conspiracy Planet  

Untitled Document

(EDITOR'S NOTE: Hollywood-Government propaganda, in the form of so-called "documentary" and "feature" films, will promote the State-Sanctioned Myth a/k/a The 9/11 Official Government Conspiracy Theory with the premiere of a film called "United 93."

Protests are being organized for Robert DeNiro's Tribeca Film Festival in New York City for the premiere of the first of these 9/11 PsyOps-Propaganda films called "United 93."

Later this year, more 9/11 propaganda films will be released including Oliver Stone's film called "World Trade Center," which will also allegedly promote the official government line that "raghead 'terrorists' destroyed the World Trade Center by driving planes into the Twin Towers." Ever heard that one before?)

So what do they want you to believe? And why the protests?

1) The movie 'United 93'is based on a myth and lies. 9/11 was an Inside Job.

2) Physical and investigative evidence shows clearly, that there was no shootdown or crash in Shanksville.

3) Debris had been planted in Shanksville, photos put on hold for 4.8 years. There was also lack of green primer on the debris or wasn't anything of ground or grass singed, where the debris had been located.

4) The 2006 cockpit transcript contradicts with the 2002 transcript and the 2001 ATC tape. There are huge discrepancies between what family members heard and Newsweek concluded from reading a transcript

5) The last 3 minutes until the official crash time are still missing

6) The U.S. Government itself orchestrated and penetrated all Sep.11th attacks.

7) Cell phones do not work at high altitude, especially in 2001.

8) The timeline of the alleged cell phone calls has inconsistencies and contradictions, also with the cockpit transcripts.

9) The movie claims falsely that passengers killed two of the alleged suspects.

10) The tail number N591UA of the official Flight 93 was noticed during April 2003 on a flight to LA

11) The cockpit recorder, built by Honeywell, had missing front parts.
There should be 25 HOURS of flight data information, complete with timestamps, but this info was never released.

In the original ATC audio tape the pilot is recorded twice within 40 seconds, while the transcript claims, it took 8 (!) minutes until he was able to talk again.

12) The original ATC tape suggests, that the pilot was part of a bomb terror drill crew.

His script "they have met our demands" was later changed into "WE have OUR demands".

13) The bio of some of the passengers is linked with military-, government and high tech companies.

Two of the passengers worked for CENSUS Bureau.

The reason of their trip was not disclosed.

14) The pilot must have spoken in English, as also heard on the ATC tape.

Air traffic Controllers otherwise couldn't have got them translated.

Therefore the claim, that Arab speaking passengers had been in the cockpit, is a bold lie.

15) The credibility of the film crew of the "United 93" movie is under strong dispute, since even their actor Lewis Alsamari has been denied entry to the US to attend the premiere.

More info also at

http://www.team8plus.org
http://killtown.911review.org
http://flight93hoax.blogspot.com

First 9/11 movie premieres in New York
http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1760948,00.html



Go to Original Article >>>

The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly




Untitled Document
Disclaimer
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact
Copyright 2005 Looking Glass News.