Untitled Document
When a huge, fast-moving, fuel-laden yet fragile object (757) strikes a steel-reinforced
structure at a 45 degree angle, predictably pieces should RICOCHET away from the
structure. True?
While some parts would penetrate into the structure considerably, most others
would shear away, showering backwards, where upon many would burn. Where are these
parts, in this seldom seen photograph taken at the Pentagon? Why don't we see
anything but bits of concrete on the helicopter landing pad? Could it be because
there aren't any pieces of a Boeing 757 to see?
Whatever type of aircraft struck the Pentagon must then have CREATED A HOLE AND
THEN FOLLOWED IT IN, a split second later. The five frames of the Pentagon vidoetape
appear to support this theory: A white streak, perhaps a missile, followed by
a mid-size aircraft silhouette, both craft simultaneously exploding.
If a huge Boeing 757 had crashed against the side of the Pentagon fortress,
we would have seen some aircraft debris on the helicopter landing pad. Would
we not?
Douglas Herman is a USAF veteran and writes for Rense
frequently.
