As each day passes, more and more Americans are becoming aware of the startling
evidence that clearly contradicts the official explanation of Sept.11th, 2001
offered by the Bush administration. In fact, as more and more
evidence comes to light, incongruities in the official explanation become
increasingly and undeniably apparent.
Ironically, the growing number of people new to these unexplained discrepancies
poses a new problem for those of us who have been researching 9/11 for many
months or years. We will have to find a way to explain the many complexities
related to the attacks to those who now doubt the official version of events.
We are faced with the overwhelming task helping great numbers of people understand
many contradictions in the 9/11 story they were fed by their government.
Obviously, that is not an easy assignment, even when the great majority of
truth seekers agree that the official explanation is little more than a pre-written
cover story designed to herd the American public into supporting an
agenda that would otherwise horrify and outrage them. However, it becomes
far more complicated in light of a topic that causes a great deal of confusion
within the research community itself. That disparity relates to the strike on
Many questions still remain about what actually took place at the Pentagon
on September 11th 2001. That’s fine, because the goal of the 9/11
truth community is to raise these questions for further investigation. The problem
arises when researchers feel that it is their responsibility to explain what
happened at the Pentagon. It is NOT. Rather, it is their charge to
highlight the doubts that have been legitimately raised regarding what exactly
hit that building.
Some researchers claim that a 110,000
ton Boeing 757 hit the building, leaving only a 16
foot hole in the facade (prior to its collapse some 22 minutes after the
initial impact.) Others claim that an
A-3 Skywarrior fighter jet was the actual aircraft. Some say it
was an unmanned Global Hawk armed with depleted uranium missiles, and still
others claim that the Pentagon was hit by another type of military
missile. We can argue each of these theories forever, and accomplish absolutely
We really have to put and end the internal dispute that is
getting us nowhere and work together to bring information rather than more uncertainty
to the public that is now just entering the 9/11 discussion. To that end, I
am posing ONE pertinent question about the strike on the Pentagon: Why
didn’t they show us the wreckage?
Planes do not simply vaporize. Never in the
history of aviation disasters has an aircraft ever totally disintegrated.
Even exploding space
shuttles did not vanish into thin air. Therefore, it stands to reason that
whatever hit the Pentagon had to leave some recoverable debris in its wake.
Surely, there had be enough identifiable rubble remaining from a 110,000
ton aircraft to satisfy the skeptics? There is no way to convince me that
the few scraps
of metal and small engine parts, which according to some researchers are
not from a 757, are proof of anything. at all. Neither am I convinced that the
handful of uninformative photos that were released were not staged by the people
who planned this event. An 110,000 tons aircraft has to leave more convincing
evidence than what we have been offered. I defy anyone, anywhere to recreate
a plane crash in which110,000 tons of aircraft are reduced to a select few,
barely identifiable parts.
Why was this most important event in America’s history not fully documented
by camera crews? Why wasn’t this event filmed and analyzed to its fullest
extent for historical and forensic purposes? Why weren’t standard crime
scene procedures followed, and why were government officials permitted to tamper
with and eventually collect and secrete all of the crime scene evidence? Last
time I looked, tampering
with or destroying crime scene evidence was a felony. Why wasn’t every
inch of the scene photographed by official investigators prior to the recovery
There is ample evidence of government complicity in the events of September
11th 2001, but nothing is more suspect than their relentless effort
to prevent the public from examining the evidence. The cover up may
actually speak louder than the actual evidence of complicity. That in itself
may be the most important thing to consider in all of this intrigue and mystery.
It is too late now for the Bush administration to make good and show us the
evidence. They have had 5 years to create a library of fabricated films and
images. By this time, they actually could have produced a hanger full of faux
plane wreckage. We needed to see the evidence at the crime scene at the time
of the crime. We did not, and the troubling question remains unanswered: why
didn’t they show us the wreckage?
Even without the mounting evidence of their involvement, nothing aside from
time travel into the past will remove the aura of government complicity in the
events of 9/11. Nothing at all can remove the cloud of suspicion that
hangs over this administration because of its undaunted and obvious efforts
to keep essential evidence at the Pentagon site hidden from the public.
One side note regarding the actions of a novice pilot attempting to hit the
Pentagon: If you were throwing a dart at a toilet
seat, would you aim at the side of the seat or would you aim down at the
top of the seat, you know…the part that many men try to avoid hitting?
Any pilot - especially a less skilled one - looking
at the Pentagon as the target of a projectile, surely would have planned
a simple, top-down, dive-bomb approach. The Pentagon is shaped like a set of
of toilet seats, one smaller than the other, each one residing in the void of
the next larger. The side of the Pentagon is 77' high yet the topside surface
target space is approximately 29 acres. What would anyone reasonably aim for
- a 29 acre target or the relatively miniscule one - on the
ONLY reinforced section of the building designed to withstand a frontal
I offer this as another common sense question left out of the discussion by
the people who continue to stand by one of the most unbelievable fairy tales
ever sold to the American public since the JFK magic bullet story. It
is another QUESTION, not an answer, in the long line of questions no
one in any official capacity has been willing to listen to, never mind answer.
In conclusion, I repeat that we have to stop trying to ANSWER the questions
that have been raised. Instead, we have to collectively demand the answers.
Even more constructively, we must focus on the essential questions that absolutely
needs to be answered. In the case of the Pentagon, where is there any concrete
evidence of the remains of a 110,000 ton Boeing 757 among the wreckage at the
scene? Why didn’t they collect, examine and reveal the wreckage
to the public? Why, why, why didn’t those in charge of finding out what
happened at the Pentagon show us the wreckage? We think we know.