Untitled Document
 |
It would seem the only case the Iraqis and the United States have against Saddam
Hussein, or the man they claim is Saddam Hussein, is the alleged mass extermination
of the Kurds in the 1980s. However, in the case of the Halabja massacre, as
I wrote on September 20, 2003 (Colin
Powell in Iraq: Exploiting the Dead of Halabja), it appears Saddam is innocent
of gassing Kurds and his innocence was proclaimed by none other than the State
Department. Stephen C. Pelletiere stated in early 2003: “We cannot say
with any certainty that Iraqi chemical weapons killed the Kurds. I am in a position
to know because, as the Central Intelligence Agency’s senior political
analyst on Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war, and as a professor at the Army War
College from 1988 to 2000, I was privy to much of the classified material that
flowed through Washington having to do with the Persian Gulf. In addition, I
headed a 1991 Army investigation into how the Iraqis would fight a war against
the United States; the classified version of the report went into great detail
on the Halabja affair.”
In fact, the United States sold chemical and biological agents to Saddam Hussein.
“Reports by the US Senate’s committee on banking, housing and urban
affairs—which oversees American exports policy—reveal that the US,
under the successive administrations of Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr, sold
materials including anthrax, VX nerve gas, West Nile fever germs and botulism
to Iraq right up until March 1992, as well as germs similar to tuberculosis
and pneumonia. Other bacteria sold included brucella melitensis, which damages
major organs, and clostridium perfringens, which causes gas gangrene,”
write Neil Mackay
and Felicity Arbuthnot for the Sunday Herald. “The shipments to Iraq
went on even after Saddam Hussein ordered the gassing of the Kurdish town of
Halabja, in which at least 5000 men, women and children died. The atrocity,
which shocked the world, took place in March 1988, but a month later the components
and materials of weapons of mass destruction were continuing to arrive in Baghdad
from the US.” Again, as Pelletiere documents, Saddam did not gas the Kurds,
not that the United States would have particularly cared at the time. As I wrote
in the above cited article, “when the Halabja massacre came to light a
few years later, the Reagan administration opposed congressional efforts to
respond by imposing economic sanctions, arguing that they would be contrary
to US interests,” in other words sanctions would have interfered with
the killing fest between the two rival nations.
As Elson E. Boles,
Assistant Professor of Sociology at Saginaw Valley State University in Michigan,
notes, “US policy makers, financiers, arms-suppliers and makers, made
massive profits from sales to Iraq of myriad chemical, biological, conventional
weapons, and the equipment to make nuclear weapons.” Moreover, the U.S.
was interested in having the Iranians and Iraqis kill each other off in large
numbers (1.5 million people eventually died in the war), as this served their
foreign policy objectives. Boles continues:
Bear in mind the attitude of the US policy makers not only regarding Iraq’s
use of gas against Iranians, but in general. Richard Armatige, then Asst.
Sec. of Defense for International Security Affairs and now Deputy Secretary
of State, said with a hint of pride in his voice that the US “was playing
one wolf off another wolf” in pursuing our so-called national interest.
This kind of cool machismo resembled the pride that Oliver North verbalized
with a grin during the Iran-Contra hearings as “a right idea”
with regard to using the Ayatollah’s money to fund the Contras. The
setting up of Iraq thus would be very consistent with the goals and the character
of US foreign policy in the Middle East: to control the region’s states
either for US oil companies or as bargaining chips in deals with other strong
countries, and to profit by selling massive quantities of weapons to states
that will war with or deter those states that oppose US “interests.”
“Iraqi authorities charged Saddam Hussein with genocide Tuesday, accusing
him of trying to exterminate the Kurds in a 1980s campaign that killed an estimated
100,000 the first move to prosecute him for the major human rights violations
which the U.S. cited to help justify its invasion,” reports ABC
News. “The latest charges involve Saddam’s alleged role in Operation
Anfal, the 1988 military campaign launched in the final months of the war with
Iran to crush independence-minded Kurdish militias and clear Kurds from the
sensitive Iranian border area of northern Iraq.”
Operation Anfal, an extension of Saddam’s Termination of Traitors campaign,
may indeed be characterized as genocide. However, if not for the United States
and the CIA, Saddam Hussein would not have gained power. “Roger Morris,
a former State Department foreign service officer who was on the NSC staff during
the Johnson and Nixon administrations, says the CIA had a hand in two coups
in Iraq during the darkest days of the Cold War, including a 1968 putsch that
set Saddam Hussein firmly on the path to power,” writes David
Morgan for Reuters. “Morris says that in 1963, two years after the
ill-fated U.S. attempt at overthrow in Cuba known as the Bay of Pigs, the CIA
helped organize a bloody coup in Iraq that deposed the Soviet-leaning government
of Gen. Abdel-Karim Kassem.”
In this former coup, the CIA provided the Ba’athists with lists of people
to be rounded up, tortured, and executed. Demonstrators were mowed down with
tanks, 10,000 people imprisoned, and opponents buried alive in mass graves.
“New evidence … published reveals that the agency not only engineered
the putsch but also supplied the list of people to be eliminated once power
was secured—a monstrous stratagem that led to the decimation of Iraq’s
professional class [doctors, lawyers, teachers and professors],” writes
Richard Sanders.
“The overthrow of president Abdul Karim Kassim on February 8, 1963 was
not, of course, the first intervention in the region by the agency, but it was
the bloodiest—far bloodier than the coup it orchestrated in 1953 to restore
the shah of Iran to power.” Ali Saleh, the minister of interior of the
regime which replaced Kassim, said: “We came to power on a CIA train.”
Saddam’s alleged massacre of 100,000 Kurds is small when compared to
the number of Iraqis killed over the last decade and a half by the United States,
the United Nations, and Britain. According to Beth
Daponte, a demographer at the Commerce Department in 1992, Bush’s
Senior’s invasion of Iraq killed 158,000 Iraqis (Daponte was subsequently
fired for releasing this information), but this figure pales in comparison to
the numbers who perished in the following decade under sanctions. Numbers vary,
but it is commonly believed between 500,000 and 750,000 (the government of Iraq
claimed over a million) children died from malnutrition and disease under the
sanctions and 1.5 million Iraqis in total lost their lives (see this
chart on the Virginia Tech website). According to a study reaching “conservative
assumptions” conducted by the Lancet Medical Journal, more than 100,000
Iraqis have died since Bush Junior’s invasion and occupation. The Lancet
“estimate excludes Falluja, a hotspot for violence. If the data from this
town is included, the compiled studies point to about 250,000 excess deaths
since the outbreak of the U.S.-led war,” John
Stokes concludes.
In short, the United States, United Nations, Britain, and the “coalition
of the killing” are responsible for the death of well over two million
people in Iraq (and an incalculable number of others are certain to die in the
Middle East and elsewhere from the use of depleted uranium and other toxins).
Saddam’s crimes are minute in this context and he is little more
than a piker when compared to Bush Senior, Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Bush Junior,
and the perfidious Straussian neocons. One day we may be fortunate enough to
witness the trial, conviction, and imprisonment of the above war criminals.
However, the way things are going—engineered “civil war” in
Iraq and rumblings of a terrible shock and awe campaign launched against Iran,
ultimately resulting in possibly a few million more dead people—I am not
holding my breath.
Go to Original Article >>>
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.
|