Untitled Document
Summary: Keith Olbermann, appearing on C-SPAN, said: "There are
people I know in the hierarchy of NBC, the company, and GE, the company, who
do not like to see the current presidential administration criticized at all.
... There are people who I work for who would prefer, who would sleep much easier
at night if this never happened. On the other hand, if they look at my ratings
and my ratings are improved and there is criticism of the president of the United
States, they're happy."
Link to Video
During a March 12 interview
with C-SPAN president and chief executive officer Brian Lamb, MSNBC host
Keith
Olbermann said: "There are people I know in the hierarchy of NBC, the
company, and GE [General Electric Co., NBC's parent corporation], the company,
who do not like to see the current presidential administration criticized at
all. ... There are people who I work for who would prefer, who would sleep much
easier at night if this never happened." He added, "On the other hand,
if they look at my ratings and my ratings are improved and there is criticism
of the president of the United States, they're happy."
Olbermann also discussed his relationship to Fox News host Bill
O'Reilly and claimed: "O'Reilly's agent calls the head of NBC week
after week saying, you have got to get Olbermann to stop" criticizing O'Reilly.
From Olbermann's interview
with Lamb, aired on the March 12 edition of C-SPAN's Q&A:
LAMB: We have got some other quotes about Fox from you:
"Fortunately for the free world, News Corp.," which owns FOX, "is
very aggressive but ultimately not very bright."
OLBERMANN: Yes, they are somewhat self-destructive. And
that's the best hope for mankind, relative to them. In other words, you know,
Bill O'Reilly, who has an audience at 8 o'clock [p.m. ET] that even with recent
programming gains on the part of my show, the total audience that he has is
still, what, six, seven times what we are doing. Even -- as Fox and News Corp.
put it, the "money demo," the 25- to 54-year-old news viewers who
don't watch news, even there they are still about double what we are doing.
When I attack Bill O'Reilly or criticize him for something that he said on
the air, some ludicrous suggestion like, you know, we should let Al Qaeda
go in and blow up San
Francisco because he doesn't like San Francisco, I mean, just lunatic
things, if I punch upwards at Fox News, the clever response, the cynical and
brilliant response is to just ignore. Like, well, why do we have to
worry, they have one-seventh of our audience? They attack. Bill O'Reilly's
agent calls the head of NBC week after week saying, you have got to get Olbermann
to stop this, as if for some reason there are rules here. We have
-- these are the people who have suspended the rules, and they want the referee
to step in protect them against my little pinky.
LAMB: More quotes. This is about Rupert Murdoch: "His
covey of flying monkeys do something journalistically atrocious every hour
of the day."
OLBERMANN: Yeah. I think that's probably true. I think --
well, sometimes they miss. They are sometimes -- there are a few hours in
a row where there might not be a flying monkey appearing, devastating society.
LAMB: Doesn't this work for both of you?
OLBERMANN: I don't think so. I haven't met a lot of flying
monkeys at NBC. I have met people who -- and by the way, this is the great
freedom and the great protection of American broadcasting, commercial broadcasting
-- we made a mistake in the '20s. We let broadcasting in this country develop
with commercial broadcasting taking the lead and all other kinds of information
on radio or television secondary or tertiary. But the protection of money
at the center of everything, including news to the degree that it is now,
is that as long as you make the money, they don't care what it is you put
on the air.
They don't care. There are people I know in the hierarchy of NBC,
the company, and GE, the company, who do not like to see the current presidential
administration criticized at all.
Anybody who knew anything about American history and stepped out at any point
in American history and got an assessment of this presidential administration
would say, "Yeah, I don't know how much they need to be criticized, but
they need to be criticized to some degree."
There are people who I work for who would prefer, who would sleep
much easier at night if this never happened. On the other hand, if
they look at my ratings and my ratings are improved and there is criticism
of the president of the United States, they're happy.
If my ratings went up because there was no criticism of the president of
the United States, they'd be happy.
Go to Original Article >>>
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.
|