Untitled Document
![](articles/mar06/meet1.jpeg)
Delivery drivers, chicken farmers, sack makers, taxi drivers and students.
Their weapons of mass destruction include battery chargers, Casio watches, and
Peanut oil
The release of the names and backgrounds of the Guantanamo inmates has revealed
what we knew all along, the world's "most dangerous terrorists" are
nothing of the sort, they are poor farmers and the like who have simply been
grabbed and stuck in cages and publicly tortured for the past four years.
We have tirelessly exposed how no
Al Qaeda "leaders" have been captured or discovered at Guantanamo
Bay either first hand or via information garnered through torture.
A US army official visiting Camp Delta was quoted in 2002 as saying there are
"...no big fish there. Some of these guys literally don't know the world
is round."
A
recent statistical report, based entirely on data supplied by the Defense
Department, and intended to provide "a more detailed picture of who the
Guantanamo detainees are, how they ended up there, and the purported bases for
their enemy combatant designation has found that fewer than half of the 517
detainees whose histories were reviewed have been accused of any hostile acts.
According to the report
(pdf) conducted by counsel to two of the detainees at Guantanamo, 40% of inmates
have no definitive connection with al Qaeda at all.
And so now it is being reported that under an enormous amount of pressure the
Pentagon has finally been "forced" into releasing
further information about the inmates being held in the Gulag in Cuba.
Although the vast majority of the detainees deny any links with or knowledge
about Al Qaeda or the Taliban, Dick Cheney has said "They're bomb-makers...
They're facilitators of terror. They're members of al-Qaida and the Taliban.
If you let them out, they'll go back to trying to kill Americans."
The evidence backing up Cheney's claims is astounding. Let's take a look at
some of the overwhelming and compelling facts that make it clear just how dangerous
the Guantanamo detainees are.
Mohammed Gul, a former supermarket delivery driver and small time farmer was
arrested at his home in eastern Afghanistan. US and Afghan forces found a Kalashnikov
rifle in his house, and that made him a suspect in attacks carried out by the
Taliban because they use the same guns. oooooooooo he's evil. No matter that
the country was littered with these weapons throughout the seventies and eighties
during the Russian invasion and literally every farmer has one.
Hafizullah Shah, also a farmer was arrested for wearing an olive green military
jacket. Certain terrorist. Now where could he have possibly got that jacket
from, in a country that has experienced constant war with several different
nations for over 3 decades? Must have been the Taliban.
![](articles/mar06/meet2.jpeg)
Abdur Sayed Rahman, a chicken farmer was arrested and remains at camp Delta because
his name is similar to a known military judge or deputy foreign minister of the
Taliban, Abdur Zahid Rahman. Well it's nearly the same they must both be Taliban.
Zain Ul Abedin (initially listed as Jumma Jan), a native of Tajikistan born
in 1978, was captured in Mazar-e-Shariff, Afghanistan, by coalition forces July
3, 2003. He told the tribunal that U.S. forces had arrested the wrong man: ``That's
true the people who found me, that's me they arrested me. But I'm not that name,
I don't know what they call me. Jumma Jan. I am not that person.'' Turns out
he was a taxi driver.
Emad Abdalla was a student in Yemen but was arrested when he visited a University
in Pakistan. The evidence against him? He had a copy of the Koran.
Habib Noor was arrested because his mentally unstable brother was accused of
fighting with the Taliban on the front lines. He is also accused of owning land
that some attackers fled to after ambushing U.S. Special Forces and Afghan military
forces. "I was just making sacks to sell at the bazaar to make money for
my family," Noor said.
Salih Uyar has insisted his purpose of travel from Turkey to Afghanistan in
2000 was to study Arabic. But no no no, he is thought to clearly be a bomb maker
by US officials because he was caught wearing a Casio watch, which is apparently
the watch choice of bomb-making Taliban.
These are the hardcore, the ones we cannot let go, we must keep them in cages,
chained to the walls.
The truth is there are no Taliban or Al Qaeda top brass at Guantanamo because
they were all flown out on US planes in a deal done with Pakistan in late 2001as
the invasion began.
INTELLIGENCE INFORMANTS
Whilst the farmers and sack makers grabbed from the front lines rot away inside
Camp Delta, there has been one detainee who has shed light on why it is that
so many others were allowed to flee or were literally taken out to safety. The
Western Intelligence agencies that funded and created the movement are routinely
using Al Qaeda double agents.
Bisher al-Rawi claims he was in the employ of MI5. al-Rawi was arrested and
moved to Gitmo in November 2002, with his brother, Wahab, while on a business
trip to Gambia, in west Africa, to set up a peanut-oil processing plant.
Mr al-Rawi is accused of harbouring the Jordanian cleric Abu Qatada, described
as Osama bin Laden's representative in Europe, in London, and also transporting
the components of a "weapon of mass destruction". He says he was being
used by MI5 to monitor extremists in Britain's Muslim community, including Abu
Qatada. The "mass destruction" equipment, say his lawyers, was a battery
charger. Al-Rawi has passed a polygraph test and the British Government will
not comment on his claims.
This information is not new and has been known since at least 2005 when the
British
media reported on it. The London Independent reported on al-Rawi on July
5 2006, indicating that British intelligence have a history of using so called
Al Qaeda operatives as informants, allowing them to be left alone as a trade
off. It was MI5 who gave the CIA information on al-Rawi that led to his arrest.
The Independent link has since been pulled.
The use of "Al Qaeda" go betweens by the intelligence services is
well documented.
Paul Joseph Watson's Order
Out Of Chaos has a whole
section devoted to Abu Qatada himself who, as was reveled in a Time
Magazine article in 2002 , is also an MI5 asset.
![](articles/mar06/meet3.jpeg)
Terror expert John Loftus has gone on record with the fact that one of the
key figures behind the July 7 attacks, Haroon
Rashid Aswat, was in the services of British Intelligence.
Aswat is a known Al Qaeda operative, yet has been used and protected on both
sides of the Atlantic by MI6 and the CIA.
Last November an Australian "al Qaeda cell" was busted by counter
terror agents, according to Melbourne's Sunday Herald Sun with the help of information
from an Islamic
"supergrass" who had met bin Laden had been crucial in the arrests
of the alleged terrorists.
It is not entirely inconceivable that the London "bombers" themselves
were MI5 stooges. In a recently leaked internal intelligence report, the four
bombers were referred to as the "Stepford Four". There is no place
called Stepford and the only entry in the dictionary for the word Stepford has
the following description: pertaining to a person with a conforming and
compliant attitude, much like a robot .
The London
Independent revealed that the bombers were well known to MI5. Two of the
four were scrutinised by MI5 last year but were not considered to be a threat.
Later evidence revealed that the bombers had traveled to Pakistan to engage
in some sort of training. Yet, there have been multiple in depth reports on
the fact that these men do not fit the profile of hard-core terrorists and were
actually likable people that had everything to live for. See the reports below:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/140705frameup.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/Pages/Jul05/170705questions.html
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2005/011105london_bomber.htm
So does this explain why the four bombers seemed to be completely calm, acting
normally, going for Big Macs, buying return tickets, arguing over being short
changed before they blew themselves up? Were they under the impression they
were working as informants for British Intelligence?
![](articles/mar06/meet4.jpeg)
We have previously revealed how former MI5 officer David
Shayler has alleged, and French intel sources have corroborated, that the
MI6 paid a Libyan Al Qaeda cell £100,000 in 1995 to assassinate colonel
Qaddafi.
The 3/11 Madrid bombers were also revealed
to be informants. The list just goes on and on.
We have previously exposed how the Intelligence agencies funded,
trained and armed "Al Qaeda" operatives.
So called "Al Qaeda" prisoners miraculously and routinely "escape"
from maximum security prisons all over the world or are allowed
to walk away from attacks they are said to have perpetrated
Many, including Iraq terror mastermind, Al-Zarqawi
have been reported as captured and killed several times but then mysteriously
pop up again, whilst other "captures" such as that of Ramzi
Bin Al-Shibah and that of Khalid
Sheikh Mohammed have been exposed as outright fakes.
The name "Al Qaeda" itself was made up by Western Intelligence according
to British Journalist Jason Burke, who points out in his in his authoritative
book Al-Qaeda: Casting a Shadow of Terror, that the name al-Qaeda entered
the popular imagination only after US officials used it to describe those who
attacked the embassies in Africa in the 1990s.
Some foreign intelligence agencies have even gone public, stating that "Al-Qaeda
is a U.S. Covert Operation".
The truth is that those we are told are dangerous terrorists are goat herders
and taxi drivers, locked away without trial and under conditions of torture.
Camp Delta is nothing more than a public relations scam designed to give us
a glimpse of "the new rules of war". We are slowly being acclimatised
to torture and imprisonment without trial. These things are now even being debated
within our own laws.
The real "Al Qaeda" operatives are sparse yet are direct assets of
the intelligence agencies being used in any way they see fit whether that be
manipulative control or freedom to operate unhindered. It is clear that our
Governments are in control of both sides of this war on terror and unless we
continually question and expose their failings they will continue to use it
to further their own domestic and foreign agendas undeterred.