Untitled Document
Napoleon Bonaparte said, “If you want to understand the policy
of a country, look at the map.”
Geography is fate.
The United Arab Emirates is situated at the center of an oil-dependent world.
This tiny state forms the promontory that juts out into the famed Strait of
Hormuz through which 40 percent of the world’s oil passes every day. Across
the narrow straight sits Iran, the next victim on the list of “axis of
evil” nations. Any attack on Iran will require that military forces quickly
deploy to Dubai to forestall the closing of the strait and the subsequent devastation
that would cost to world oil supplies and financial markets.
This is the critical point that is being intentionally concealed by America’s
diversionary media. This is the reason that President Bush continues to force
the Dubai port-plan even though 70 percent of the American people and Congress
resoundingly oppose it.
The importance of UAE as a staging area for future hostilities cannot
be overstated. No military strategy can hope to succeed without first establishing
a beachhead across the strait in Iran, so that the danger of blowing up oil
tankers and blocking passage is removed. This tells us that plans for an attack
may be on track for late March as originally threatened by Israel.
For its part, Iran has been trying to work out an agreement for enriching uranium
with Russia, although Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad still insists that
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) provides an “inalienable right”
for the peaceful development of nuclear fuel.
Ahmadinejad is right, of course, but it makes little difference. The United
States has already brushed aside the Iran-Russia plan and is pushing to have
the Security Council censure Iran at its next meeting. So too, talks have broken
off between Iran and the EU-3 without producing any positive results. The Euro-leaders
are clearly abetting Washington’s gambit; paving the way for another war.
Why?
Ahmadinejad has done nothing to help his cause by blurting out absurd statements
that have made him look foolish and irrational. (Israel should be “wiped
off the map”) Still, it’s doubtful that anyone could withstand the
withering “swift-boating” of the western media once they commence
their campaign of character-assassination, the likes of which we have seen many
times before.
Ahmadinejad recently said, “We want peace, security, and progress for
all the countries of the region, especially our neighbors. History has shown
that Iran is a good neighbor. We are just working on nuclear fuel for peaceful
purposes.” His comments, of course, were not covered in the western media
since they conveyed the message of a responsible leader with benign motives,
rather than the ridiculous blather of a madman.
As far as we know, however, Ahmadinejad has been straightforward in his claims.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has consistently found that Iran
has fully complied with the terms of the NPT and that there “is no evidence
of a nuclear weapons program.”
That hasn’t stopped Washington, though. The die was cast for war with
Iran nearly a decade ago in policy papers drawn up by far-right political ideologues
who now control all the levers of foreign policy in the Bush White House.
The situation with Iran is bound to reach crisis-level this week as the IAEA’s
board off governors is expected to issue a statement expressing its fears that
Iran may be developing nuclear weapons.
Al Jazeera reported, “Diplomats in Washington and Vienna said the Security
Council could adopt a 'presidential declaration' calling on Tehran to heed IAEA
calls to suspend uranium enrichment and cooperate with inspections.”
A “presidential declaration?”
This is a clear admission that the IAEA has NOT found Iran in violation of
its treaty obligations, but is looking for some way to accommodate the United
States’ insistence that Iran should be publicly scolded by the international
body.
Will this public humiliation be used as a pretext for war?
A Western diplomat told AFP the European countries had “decided against
a resolution” at this week’s board meeting, after hearing from Russia
and China that there was no support for one. (Al Jazeera)
Again, this suggests that there is no proof of foul play.
Nevertheless, European leaders and the United States want to issue a “statement”
that would call on Iran to voluntarily suspend all enrichment activities and
submit to more extensive investigations.” In other words, Iran is being
asked to voluntarily give up all of its rights under the terms of the NPT.
But why would Iran willingly accept being treated like a pariah when there
is “no evidence” that it has done anything wrong?
The hypocrisy of this Bush-backed plan is breathtaking. Bush just finished
a trip to India and Pakistan, where he effectively declared himself the final
arbiter of who will get nuclear technology and fuel and who won’t. His
actions were a clear affront to the IAEA, the UN, the NPT, and the United States
Congress, which is supposed to determine such matters as treaties.
Bush has apparently elected himself the god of all-things nuclear.
He has successfully destroyed the already feeble credibility of the NPT by
capriciously handing out nuclear technology to friends and withholding it from
enemies. He turned the notion of evenhandedness and international law into a
private fiefdom where science and technology are distributed according to the
whims of Washington mandarins.
The NPT is dead.
Will this final assault on international agreements clear the path for war
with Iran?
It is hard to say, but the Financial Times reported, “Iranian activists
involved in a classified research project for the marines told the FT the Pentagon
was examining the depth and nature of grievances against the Islamic government
(Iran) and appeared to be studying whether Iran would be prone to violent fragmentation
along the same kind of fault-lines that are splitting Iraq.”
So, along with the $85 million Congress just voted to provide for “pro-democracy”
movements in Iran, Marine Intelligence is looking for ways to exacerbate ethnic
tensions to foment revolution to topple the Tehran government. The plan for
“regime change” in Iran is still being aggressively pursued, even
though neighboring Iraq is in utter chaos.
The UAE port deal is just more indication that an attack on Iran is forthcoming.
Its location is crucial to the success of any American invasion.
For Pentagon warlords Dubai has become the strategic-epicenter of the global
resource war. As peace-activist and author Uri Avnery said, “Regimes come
and go, rulers rise and fall, ideologies flourish and wither, but geography
stands forever. It’s geography that decides the basic interest of every
state.”
All eyes should be focused on Dubai and the tenuous future of the Strait
of Hormuz.
Mike Whitney lives in Washington state. He can be reached
at: fergiewhitney@msn.com.