Untitled Document
Ford Motor Company has been charged in an Argentine court with playing
a direct part in the illegal detention, torture and “disappearances”
of its own workers under the dictatorship that ruled the South American country
from 1976 to 1983.
The US automaker is accused in both a criminal and a civil lawsuit filed this
week of carrying out “management terrorism” under the military regime
in order to suppress worker militancy at its Argentine production plants.
The lead plaintiff in the case, Pedro Norberto Troiani, was a union delegate
at the automaker’s plant in General Pachecho, outside Buenos Aires, in
1976, when the Argentine military seized power in a US-backed coup. He is suing
on behalf of more than two dozen of union committee members and other workers
who were seized at gunpoint by security forces, many of them as they worked
on Ford’s assembly lines, others at their homes.
“Some of us were kidnapped by the security forces inside the factory
and transferred to a makeshift clandestine detention center set up at a sports
area of the factory,” Troiani, now 64 years old, recalled. “There,
they hooded us and beat us; we suffered mock executions and were tortured,”
he said, adding that their captors shocked them with an electric probe.
The case, which was initiated three years ago, has gathered documentary evidence
as well as testimony establishing that Ford management collaborated intimately
with the dictatorship in identifying militants and providing direct assistance
in their abduction and torture.
“After evaluating all of the material, we reached the conclusion that
the company wanted to get rid of the delegates who were bothering it,”
explained Tomas Ojea Urquiza, the lawyer in the case.
Witnesses testified that their kidnappers had received detailed files from
the company’s personnel office and used company identification card photographs
to identify them. In a number of cases, the workers were paraded through the
plant surrounded by military personnel in a clear attempt to intimidate the
rest of the workforce.
Some 5,000 workers were employed at the plant at the time. One of the principal
vehicles that they produced was the Ford Falcon, which became infamous as the
car of choice for the so-called ‘task forces” that were used in
rounding up perceived opponents of the military, nearly 30,000 of whom “disappeared”
under the dictatorship.
Ford, the suit charges, in addition to providing the space for the clandestine
detention center, donated vehicles to the military for the express purpose of
carrying out the roundup of its own employees.
The court action seeks the arrest of four ex-Ford officials, including the
company’s ex-director in Argentina, Nicolas Enrique Courad, a Chilean
citizen, as well as that of one retired military officer. It also asks that
the factory be placed on an official list of clandestine detention and torture
centers that operated under the dictatorship.
According to the lawsuit, “The Ford company hatched and executed a precise
and concrete plan to violently put an end to union activity, with the objective
of creating management terrorism that would permit it to reduce personnel indiscriminately
and without major costs, speed up the production lines without any problem...[and]
ignore the unsafe working conditions.”
Ford’s action turned the company into “one more gear in the machinery
of state terrorism,” said the attorney, Ojea Urquiza.
The case cites as a precedent the conviction in the war crimes trials at Nuremberg
of Friedrich Flick, the German steel magnate who reaped profit off the exploitation
of some 48,000 slave laborers from the Nazi concentration camps.
In addition to the criminal case, a civil case was filed naming Ford Motor
Company, both its world headquarters in the US and its Argentine affiliate,
and demanding economic compensation for the surviving workers who were tortured
in the automaker’s General Pacheco plant.
The action against the Ford workers was by no means unique. Both before and
after the March 1976 coup, clandestine death squads and the security forces
rounded up militant workers throughout the country, often with the direct collaboration
of the right-wing Peronist union leadership. Of the 30,000 “disappeared,”
more than two-thirds were workers.
The Argentine autoworkers union, SMATA, which represented the Ford workers,
had in 1975 called upon the Justice Ministry to intervene in the Mercedes Benz
factory in a Buenos Aires suburb to break up the workers commission there, which
the union bureaucracy described as a “group of provocateurs allied with
the sedition.”
Following the coup, 16 militant workers were abducted either from the Mercedes
Benz plant or their homes and “disappeared.” All but two have never
been found and are assumed to have been executed.