Untitled Document
I don’t care if the war criminal Dick Cheney shot one of his
rich Republican friends. I am disgusted by this story dominating headlines while
the Straussian neocons—who run roughshod over the Constitution in dictatorial
fashion through their cardboard cut-out, brain damaged, unelected president—methodically
plan to attack another sovereign nation and kill hundreds of thousands of people,
poison millions of innocent others with depleted uranium, destroy and loot more
antiquities, deliberately wreck hospitals, electrical plants and water and sewage
treatment facilities, the same way they did in Iraq.
Harry Whittington’s gunshot wounds are nothing compared to the
distinct possibility the Straussian neocons may use nuclear weapons against
the people of Iran—and down the road, against other official
enemies, numbering in the billions (according to the “heavy-lifter”
Straussian neocon Frank
Gaffney, these enemies include the people of China, Russia, and “anti-American”
countries in Latin America, in other words Latin American countries that have
rejected neoliberalism and are sick and tired of globalist bankers and multinational
carpetbaggers stealing their natural resources and impoverishing their people).
Katherine
Brengle documents how Cheney considers himself above the law, bird hunting
without proper legal documentation. For some reason we are supposed to be upset
about this. Meanwhile, right out in the open and yet ignored, there is a bundle
of damning evidence that makes the Cheney hunting incident pale by way of comparison:
Cheney the scurrilous war profiteer, his advocacy of the use of torture by the
CIA, Powell’s chief of staff Lawrence Wilkerson’s accusations that
Cheney disdainfully violated the Geneva Conventions.
Cheney’s war crimes have besmirched the public record for over a decade
and a half—it was Cheney, as Secretary of War in the Bush Senior administration,
who engineered and instigated a 43-day bombing campaign against Iraq (the most
devastating concentrated bombing attack in history at the time), a blitzkrieg
that targeted Iraqi electrical, water, and sewage treatment systems, resulting
in massive civilian casualties, especially children, the elderly, and the sick,
in short the most vulnerable of Iraqi society, a particularly horrendous war
crime.
“So, what did Cheney have to say about these choices of targets after
the war, when there was no way to deny the deadly effects on civilians?”
asked Robert
Jensen, writing for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. “Every Iraqi target
was ‘perfectly legitimate,’ … adding ‘if I had to do
it over again, I would do exactly the same thing.’” In short, Cheney
is not only a war criminal, he is an unrepentant war criminal, an anti-human
sociopath who brags about his serial murdering exploits. All of this is scrupulously
avoided in the corporate media.
Meanwhile, Straussian neocon provocations, far more worthy of headlines and
analysis, are relegated below the fold.
An Australian TV show has revealed “terrible photographs” of Abu
Ghraib prisoner abuse, “bloodier and more sexually charged than the originals”
(if you wish to stomach such sadism, follow this Rolling
Stone link and watch a video montage).
It is hardly a coincidence these new photos were released as “rioting
erupted … as tens of thousands of people took to the streets in Pakistan’s
third straight day of violent protests over the Prophet Muhammad cartoons.
Three people were killed, including an 8-year-old boy,” according to ABC
News. As suspected, these riots are well organized, although specifics are
absent (asking the question “who benefits” usually settles the issue).
“An Associated Press reporter in Lahore saw crowd members who appeared
to be orchestrating the attacks, directing protesters—some of whom were
carrying containers of kerosene—toward particular targets. The demonstrators
also set the provincial government assembly building on fire,” Asif
Shahzad writes for the Chicago Sun Times.
Speaking of kerosene and fires—at least in a metaphorical sense—Roberto
Calderoli, Italian Reforms Minister and member of the neocon friendly Lega Nord
(Northern League), has declared his intention “to wear a T-shirt sporting
cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad that have sparked violent reactions from Muslims
around the world,” reports the Mail
& Guardian, thus inflaming Muslim anger even more.
It now appears there is a possibility Cheney may be charged with criminal “negligence,
defined as failing to understand the dangers involved and disregarding them,
or recklessness, defined as understanding the dangers and disregarding them”
if Whittington dies from injuries sustained in the so-called hunting mishap,
according to the New York Times.
Shooting Whittington, of course, is the least of Cheney’s crimes,
and if indeed justice prevailed in the world he would be immediately arrested
for the above enumerated crimes, tried before a jury of his peers, convicted
like Nazi war criminals of yore, allowed a one appeal, and then marched to the
gallows. Of course, this will not happen, not any more than he will suffer serious
consequence from the criminal negligence of shooting Harry M. Whittington at
close range with bird shot.