Many believe that election is a sign of democracy. Yet it is few, who
understand that election is in fact a double edge sword, and could also be used
as an oppressive tool to pacify opposition and dissent into conformity. Election
is a tool often used to foment competition and violence among different groups
(political, ethnic and religious) within the same people. Political capitalism
uses money, military power, and disinformation to determine the results of elections.
Through money votes could be bought, through military power people could be
terrorized to vote for a certain group, and through fraud and misinformation
the votes of “free” people could be easily prejudiced towards a
Election is considered the ultimate expression of free sovereign democratic
nations. Freedom is the essential component for any sovereign country to be
democratic so that its people would exercise election. Without freedom a nation
could be coerced to “elect” its government. Political capitalism
uses military power (local or foreign) to terrorize people and force them to
elect certain leaders. Many tyrant and corrupt regimes had been elected this
way. We had seen this form of election in old Soviet Union, in South American
countries which had US military bases on their soil, in South African countries,
and in the Arab world.
The ugliest form of militarily enforced election is that “exercised”
under foreign occupation. The American new concept of exporting democracy through
war is a flagrant form of this militarily enforced election. This is obviously
seen in Afghani and Iraqi elections under American occupation. It is also seen
in Palestinian election under Israeli occupation. These elections are characterized
by terror, violence, restriction of movement, and control over the electoral
process to elect a government loyal to or at least conforming to the occupying
power. Many of the “undesired” candidates are assassinated or imprisoned.
American administration understands this very well, that is why it demanded
an end to “Syrian occupation” of Lebanon to end and the Syrian troops
to withdraw from Lebanon before the Lebanese could have their own election.
Unfortunately this democracy-encouraging administration did not similarly demand
end of Israeli occupation of Palestine before Palestinians could have their
Political capitalism uses money to sway the results of election. This is the
“modern” form of “political occupation”. Votes can be
bought. Political parties can be bribed and controlled through political monetary
contributions. American administration favors this type of intervention through
its USAID programs to control elections in foreign countries as it did in South
America throughout the last two decades. The latest such intervention was in
Venezuela when the administration financed the opposition to demand a recall
of the election. American campaign money ($2 million) was also spent in Russian
Georgia during 2004 election to get rid of Shevardnadze. Campaign money is also
being poured in Haiti to influence its coming election and its political future.
The American administration (the exporter of democracy) buys elections with
its USAID program. It ties the economy of poor countries with its aid that they
become so dependent on it and would conform to American dictates for fear of
losing this aid that keeps their economy going. Usually this money is used for
projects that greatly benefit the ruling elite of that country, and becomes
a leash to curb them.
The American administration, recently, has hastened to spend $2 million in
the form of USAID projects before the start of the Palestinian Parliamentary
election to boost Fatah’s chance of winning. The money is designed to
improve the image of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and its Fatah party. Their
image had suffered tremendously in the eyes of Palestinians due to their incompetence,
corruption, and collusion with the Israeli government. To maximize its credit
PA’s name alone was written on these projects as a proof of its effectiveness.
A consulting firm (Strategic Assessment Initiative ASI) has been subcontracted
to plan and to run daily events in the name of the PA during the election week.
Such events included street cleaning, food and water distribution on border
crossings, youth sport activities, and donating computer systems to organizations.
Some of the money was paid directly into bank accounts of Fatah candidates
and their campaign organizers. The Palestinian Information Center had published
on its website a letter that has the official stamp of the American Embassy
in Tel Aviv sent to PA Information Minister Nabeel Amr in response to a letter
he sent to the embassy dated October 9th of last year asking for financial support
for Fatah’s electoral campaign. The official letter states that US is
ready to support Fatah against Hamas, and asks Mr. Amr to provide 30 bank accounts
in Israeli banks for Fatah’s members in order to deposit the money.
Withholding aid money is a form of intimidation and coercion to effect changes
in the election results. The American administration has threatened to stop
its aid money to Palestinians if Hamas (labeled as a terrorist group by the
administration) enters or wins the election. American resources warned that
the administration would “review” its financial aid to Palestinians
due to American prohibitions on providing any “material support”
to groups on Washington’s terrorist list. The US reserves the sole authority
to establish such a terrorist list and force it on the world. David Welch, Assistant
Secretary of State, warned that “there should be no place in the political
process for groups and individuals who refuse to renounce terror and violence
or refuse to recognize Israel’s right to exist or refuse to disarm.”
EU officials had expressed similar reservation (threats) if any group who advocates
violence might win election. They threatened that donor countries might withhold
their monetary donations if Hamas wins the election. It is worth mentioning
here the fact that those donor countries had withheld much of it money to Palestinians
due to Fatah’s PA corruption. The donated money is supposed to be spent
on humanitarian and economical projects and not to be politicized. Palestinians
considered these threats as a clear attempt of the Western countries to buy
their conscious and their freedom of choice and to dictate the results of election.
They wonder what kind of democracy these so-called democratic countries are
trying to spread when they try to buy the electoral votes.
After the unexpected landslide Hamas’ victory in the election (total
of 80 seats out of 132) European countries followed the American lead and jumped
on Hamas’ back demanding that it acknowledges Israel’s right to
exist, renounces terror (resistance) and disarms in order to be recognized as
a legitimate government and to enter peace negotiations with Israel. It seems
that they have ignored the fact that Israel is the real terrorist state; Israel
is the occupier of Palestinian land, the murderer of civilians, the destroyer
of civilian homes, and the breaker of international laws (Israel had violated
at least 429 UN resolutions against it). Successive Israeli government calls
for “Greater Israel” that means the annihilation of Arabs from Nile
to Euphrates. The fact is Hamas sprang out of the Israeli occupation of Palestine.
Hamas did not invade another country; rather it is fighting to free its own
country from the Israeli ruthless occupation. Hamas does not consider peace
negotiation as an end result as presented by the US and Israel; rather as means
to an end. Hamas believes that negotiations without power do not yield good
results and sites the last ten years of Fatah’s negotiation with Israel
as a proof.
Hamas is a real obstacle to the Israeli expansion. The Israeli government tried
uselessly to remove this obstacle through force. Its use of the military force,
including tanks, helicopter gun ships and F-16 bombers against Palestinians
inside heavily populated areas, its imposition of collective punishment measures
such as closures, its checkpoints and restriction of movements, its continued
build up of the Israeli colonies in the occupied West Bank, and its building
of the jailing wall and barbed wire fences had failed to eliminate resistance.
On the contrary, the more oppressive measures the Israeli army inflicts on Palestinians
the more determined the Palestinians to resist, and the more ingenious they
become in their methods of resistance.
Since Hamas is not a political body international political pressure has no
effect on it. Israel and US resorted to election as a way to contain Hamas.
Becoming part of a Palestinian government, it is hoped, Hamas would be bound
by all the past political agreements PA had signed on, and Israel would be able
to apply all the international political pressure against it, and eventually
would be vindicated when it completely destroys the Palestinian Authority since
it would have a “terrorist” element within it.
Hamas had entered the election to revolutionize the Palestinian political system.
Hamas claims it wants to turn the system from a single to a multi-party rule,
where all factions would share into decision making. It wants to end corruption,
curb expenditure, and maintains public money. Reforming Palestinian Liberation
Organization to really defend Palestinian rights is another goal of the organization.
Most importantly it wants to draw attention to the fact that the core of the
problem is the Israeli occupation, and that its resistance to this occupation
is a legitimate right.
Many state that Hamas’ immediate problem is money to manage the daily
affairs of the people, in particular to pay wages of government employees especially
those within the Palestinian Security Forces. The American donated money to
the PA has been designated to pay the wages of the Security Forces. When this
money is withheld it is expected that the mostly Fatah Security Forces would
revolt against Hamas’ government. Hamas is planning to bring the PA out
of its isolation back to the Arab and Islamic countries for financial and political
support. Many of the Arab countries (Egypt, Jordan, and the rich Gulf countries)
are close partners within the American war against terrorism and have close
economic ties with the US, thus they would not be able to extend any support
to a Hamas government (a terrorist government according to the American standards).
We have to wait and see if Hamas have plans to get out of this Israeli/American
“democratic electoral” trap.
* Dr. Elias Akleh is an Arab writer from a Palestinian
descent, born in the town of Beit-Jala and lives in the US.