Untitled Document
Groups fighting for the rights of peasant communities are stepping
up pressure on governments to ban the use of genetically modified ''suicide
seeds'' at UN-sponsored talks on biodiversity in Spain this week.
''This technology is an assault on the traditional knowledge, innovation, and
practices of local and indigenous communities,'' said Debra Harry, executive
director of the U.S.-based Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism.
The group is among organizations urging United Nations experts to recommend
that governments adopt tough laws against field testing and selling Terminator
technology, which refers to plants that have had their genes altered so that
they render sterile seeds at harvest. Because of this trait, some activists
call Terminator products ''suicide seeds.''
Developed by multinational agribusinesses and the U.S. government,
Terminator has the effect of preventing farmers from saving or replanting seeds
from one growing season to the next.
The product is being tested in greenhouses throughout the United States. Opponents
fear it is likely to be marketed soon unless governments impose a ban.
''Terminator seeds will become a commercial reality unless governments take
action to prevent it,'' said Hope Shand of the Canada-based Action Group on
Erosion, Technology, and Concentration (ETC Group).
If commercialized, activists said, Terminator would force farmers to return
to the market for seeds every year, adding to their annual costs. This also
would spell the end of locally adapted agriculture through seed selection, because
most farmers in the world today routinely save seeds from their harvest for
replanting.
''This seed technology is a fundamental violation of the human rights of indigenous
people,'' Harry said of Terminator. ''It is a breach of the right of self-determination.''
Environmental and consumer advocates also have said that genetically modified
crops--ranging from Terminator to ''Round Up Ready'' varieties designed to survive
the heavy duty herbicide Round Up--offer the promise of fat profits for their
developers, marketers, and political supporters while threatening farmers with
lean times and consumers with ill-health.
''The promise of increased profit is too enticing for industry to give up on
Terminator seeds,'' says Lucy Sharratt of the International Ban Terminator Campaign.
The issue has pitted some governments against their citizens. Canadian government
officials at a UN meeting in Bangkok last year pushed for language allowing
the field testing and sale of Terminator. But they backed down in response to
strong public criticism at home.
For their part, biotech companies have enjoyed limited success in trying to
influence governments' policies in favor of using Terminator seeds. Their main
argument: that Terminator's higher cost is more than compensated for in improved
crop yield and quality at harvest time.
Governments generally have distinguished between different types of genetic
modification. Many--especially those in industrially developing regions of the
world--have resisted pressure from the biotechnology industry and the U.S. government
and maintain a strong stand against Terminator.
The government of Brazil--the world's fifth most populous country and a major
agricultural producer--last year enacted a law that prohibits the use, registration,
patenting, and licensing of genetically modified (GM) seeds. India, a predominantly
agrarian nation and home to more than one billion people, has done the same.
However, a number of governments have agreed with industry statements that
other genetic modifications can play a significant role in combating hunger
at negligible risk to the environment.
Even so, a 100-page report released last week by Friends of the Earth (FoE),
a leading international environmental group, concludes that only a handful of
countries have introduced and increased the use of genetically modified crops--and
then again, largely because of aggressive lobbying by the biotech industry.
Entitled ''Who Benefits from GM Crops?'' the report says that after 10 years
of GM crop cultivation, more than 80 percent of the area cultivated with biotech
crops is still concentrated in only three countries: the United States, Argentina,
and Canada.
In other countries--including Paraguay and Brazil, GM crops were planted illegally
and in Indonesia, they were planted after government officials were bribed,
FoE said.
This week's UN talks in Madrid are scheduled to continue until Friday.