Untitled Document
Comment: I'm not sure what this piece is aiming to do but
yes, we are certainly "conspiracy theorists who like to keep up a constant
barrage of "whacko" dialogue" about Bilderberg. I mean we wouldn't
simply post manistream news articles from the likes of the
BBC about how Bilderberg influence world politics behind closed doors.
D.L. McCracken /
Halifax Live | January 15 2006
Sometime later in 2006 the 52nd meeting of the Bilderberg Group will
begin and continue over a period of four days in a five-star hotel resort. In
attendance will be no more than 100 of some of the west's chief political movers,
business leaders, bankers, industrialists, strategic thinkers and even a trusted
journalist or two. All participants will be absolutely forbidden from disclosing
what they discussed during the four days although the invited journalists are
provided with a vague press release for the curious.
For instance, last year's Bilderberg Meeting which allegedly took place at
the Dorint Sofitel Uberfahrt hotel near Munich, Germany dealt with such wide-ranging
topics as American-European relations, Russia, Iran, Iraq, the Middle East,
Asia, economic problems and nuclear nonproliferation. No details will ever be
known as will be the case this year.
When the four-day meeting is over various minor tidbits of information will
make mostly non-mainstream news and conspiracy theorist’s websites which
is exactly what the Bilderbergers want to occur - their thinking is as long
as the conspiracy theorists keep up a constant barrage of "whacko"
dialogue about the secret society, the longer their secret and their real agenda
will remain safe.
The name 'Bilderberg' derives from the very first meeting of the group way
back in 1954. The first group met at the Bilderberg Hotel in Holland. The first
meeting was called by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands in response to his
concerns regarding the increasingly antagonistic relationship between the U.S.
and Western Europe thus providing the Group with a declared purpose - to further
the understanding between Western Europe and North America through informal
meetings between powerful individuals. The Group has grown since that first
meeting in 1954 and has met once a year every year since that time. Most of
the world has no knowledge of the society or their meetings.
The Group has incorporated two official languages into their meetings - English
and French. Spouses of all invitees are banned from attendance and invitations
go exclusively to residents of Europe and North America. The list of invitees
will never be more than 100. As mentioned earlier, journalists are invited but
are banned from reporting any of it and are not allowed entrance into the actual
meetings. Everyone invited whether they are kings or prime ministers or world
renowned business tycoons are expected and required to leave all official credentials
at the door - when they enter into official discussion, they are participating
as members of the human race only. Security is provided by military intelligence.
Which military intelligence is not known. Of course, this only perpetuates the
conspiracy theorists belief that the Bilderberg Society are the puppet masters
of a New World Order and have been pulling the strings of humankind since at least
1954.
Even though this could very well be the truth, the Bilderbergers continue to
feel secure and safely protected by these same conspiracy theorists, the "whackos"
who no sane person would believe for a moment.
Every year before the official announcement of the next Bilderberg Meeting,
the Group releases a list of the year's attendees. One might ask why such a
secret society would be so foolish as to release the names of those invited.
Actually it's quite simple - how else are these famous movers and shakers going
to explain a mass four-day disappearance? Far better to be up front in the beginning
then to say nothing and invite intrusive snooping later.
There has been no mention of the dates for the 53rd annual Bilderberg Meeting
of 2006 and subsequently, no list of this year's attendees. But to place the
meetings into even more perspective, it is quite easy to find lists of last
year's meeting or the year before. Keep in mind, there is no reason supplied
by the Bilderbergers as to why a specific person has been invited nor will there
be. They have wisely left that supposition up to the conspiracy theorists.
So let's take a look at a few of the past and current attendees to
the annual Bilderberg Meetings:
-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld;
-Former US Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz;
-Henry Kissinger who helped found the Group;
-U.S. Sen. J. William Fulbright;
-Dean Acheson (Secretary of State under Truman);
-President Johnson’s Under Secretary of State, George Ball
-Nelson Rockefeller
-David Rockefeller
-Kennedy’s Secretary of State Dean Rusk
-Gerald Ford
-Prince Philip
-Lord Louis Mountbatten
-Robert S. McNamara
-Margaret Thatcher
-Lester Pearson
-Helmut Schmidt
-Donald S. MacDonald (former Canadian Defence Minister)
-Henry Ford III
-Gen. Walter Bedell Smith (former CIA Director)
-Gen. Alexander Haig
-Michael Dukakis
-Bill Clinton
-Vice President Dan Quayle
-Conrad Black
-Raymond A.J. Chretien
-Stephane Dion
-Preston Manning
-Frank McKenna
-Paul Martin (while Minister of Finance)
-Stephen Harper (while Leader of The Opposition in 2003)
While I have presented an extensive list here, the full roster goes on for
pages.
Interestingly enough, no actual proof can be found that George W. Bush ever
attended a Bilderberg Meeting. The closest one can come to associating Bush
with the Bilderbergs is the fact that he was visiting several Bilderberg venue
cities at the time of the meetings. His name however is not on any official
lists.
So where does all this leave us? Really, no further ahead then the beginning.
Anyone can Google 'Bilderberg' and be provided with reams of material. But not
one word in all those pages will be officially sanctioned by the Group. Because
they're secret. If Paul Martin or Stephen Harper were pointedly questioned about
their participation in a Bilderberg Meeting, they might affirm that they were
in attendance because that is public knowledge. But they will not reveal why
they were invited nor will they reveal what they discussed while behind closed
doors.
This bothers me. Someone at one time coined a little phrase in an attempt
to sum up the Bilderberg Group and it goes like this: The Bilderberg Group is
a “little clique of powerful men who meet secretly and plan..."
Scary little phrase, isn't it..