Untitled Document
Friday 06 May 2005
"There are a hundred or more people wandering around Washington today
who have heard the 'real stuff,' as they put it - and despite their professional
caution when the obvious question arises, there is one reaction they all feel
free to agree on: that nobody who felt shocked, depressed or angry after reading
the edited White House transcripts should ever be allowed to hear the actual
tapes, except under heavy sedation or locked in the trunk of a car. Only a terminal
cynic, they say, can listen for any length of time to the real stuff without
feeling a compulsion to do something like drive down to the White House and
throw a bag of live rats over the fence."
- Hunter S. Thompson, 04 July 1973
The document almost reads like satire. "Bush wanted to remove Saddam,"
reads the leaked
secret British intelligence memo dated 23 July 2002, "through military
action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence
and facts were being fixed around the policy."
The intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy? You don't say.
Plenty of people have been bellowing about this for years now, often risking
their own well-being and that of their families in the process. Richard Clarke,
former White House Counter-Terrorism Czar, spent a lot of time talking about
how the books were being cooked to justify an invasion of Iraq. Tom Maertens,
who was National Security Council director for nuclear non-proliferation for
both the Clinton and Bush White House, backed up Clarke's story with his own
eyewitness testimony.
Roger Cressey, Clarke's former deputy, witnessed one of the most damning charges
that has been leveled against the administration by Clarke: They blew past al
Qaeda after the 9/11 attacks, focusing instead on Iraq. Donald Kerrick, a three-star
General who served as deputy National Security Advisor under Clinton and stayed
for several months in the Bush White House, likewise saw this happening.
Paul O'Neill, former Treasury Secretary for George W. Bush, was afforded a
position on the National Security Council because of his job as Treasury Secretary,
and sat in on the Iraq invasion planning sessions which were taking place months
before the attacks of September 11. Those planning sessions kicked into high
gear when the Towers came down.
Greg Thielmann, former Director of the Office of Strategic, Proliferation,
and Military Issues in the State Department, watched with shock and awe as the
White House rolled out the 'uranium from Niger' war justifications that had
been so thoroughly debunked. Joseph Wilson, former ambassador and career diplomat,
was the one who debunked it.
After Wilson described what he didn't see in Niger in the New York Times,
the White House reached out and crushed his wife's career. His wife, Valerie
Plame, was a deep-cover CIA agent running a network dedicated to tracking any
person, group or nation that would give weapons of mass destruction to terrorists.
The White House torpedoed her career and her network as a warning to Wilson,
and to any other whistleblower who might come forward.
The most damning testimony regarding "fixing intelligence and facts around
the policy" came from Air Force Lt. Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski. Kwiatkowski
worked in the office of Undersecretary for Policy Douglas Feith, and worked
specifically with a secretive outfit called the Office of Special Plans. Kwiatkowski's
own words tell her story: "From May 2002 until February 2003, I observed
firsthand the formation of the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans and watched
the latter stages of the neoconservative capture of the policy-intelligence
nexus in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq."
"I saw a narrow and deeply flawed policy," continued Kwiatkowski,
"favored by some executive appointees in the Pentagon used to manipulate
and pressurize the traditional relationship between policymakers in the Pentagon
and U.S. intelligence agencies. I witnessed neoconservative agenda bearers within
OSP usurp measured and carefully considered assessments, and through suppression
and distortion of intelligence analysis promulgate what were in fact falsehoods
to both Congress and the executive office of the president."
In other words, they fixed the intelligence and facts around the policy. The
policy, of course, was invasion.
Each of these people, and others like them who reported similar intelligence
book-cooking, were brushed off by the White House, dismissed out of hand as
liars, or worse, Democrats. With the leaking of the secret British intelligence
memo, however, their reports have been confirmed.
Some other tasty tidbits from the memo:
1. "It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action,
even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not
threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya,
North Korea or Iran."
Despite the fact that Hussein was considered less of a threat than Iran, North
Korea and even Libya, Bush had made up his mind to invade. Wrapping this around
the flatly-declared statement that the intelligence and facts were being framed
around the 'policy,' i.e. the invasion, is damning.
2. "The Attorney-General said that the desire for regime change was not
a legal base for military action. There were three possible legal bases: self-defence,
humanitarian intervention, or UNSC authorisation. The first and second could
not be the base in this case. Relying on UNSCR 1205 of three years ago would
be difficult. The situation might of course change."
The British Attorney General made it clear that the war plan as constituted
was illegal. Therefore, other justifications for war were required. "The
situation might of course change," reads the text. It did. They fabricated
WMD evidence to justify self-defense.
3. "The Prime Minister said that it would make a big difference politically
and legally if Saddam refused to allow in the UN inspectors. Regime change and
WMD were linked in the sense that it was the regime that was producing the WMD.
There were different strategies for dealing with Libya and Iran. If the political
context were right, people would support regime change. The two key issues were
whether the military plan worked and whether we had the political strategy to
give the military plan the space to work."
In many ways, this is the worst of the three. Hans Blix and his inspectors
went into Iraq and found no weapons of mass destruction in their searches. Ergo,
there was no self-defense justification and no legal basis for war. Yet in order
to create the legal and political justification of self-defense, as stated in
the memo, Hussein had to be seen as blocking those inspections. He didn't. In
fact, it was the Bush administration that thwarted Blix while stacking hundreds
of thousands of troops on the border. At one point, Bush even went so far as
to declare that Hussein had actually not allowed the inspectors in, even as
Blix and his people were shaking the Iraqi dust off their boots.
Ray McGovern, a 27-year veteran CIA analyst, nails it to the door. "It
has been a hard learning - that folks tend to believe what they want to believe,"
wrote McGovern in an essay regarding this leaked memo. "As long as our
evidence, however abundant and persuasive, remained circumstantial, it could
not compel belief. It simply is much easier on the psyche to assent to the White
House spin machine blaming the Iraq fiasco on bad intelligence than to entertain
the notion that we were sold a bill of goods. Well, you can forget circumstantial."
The butcher's bill to date: 1,594 American soldiers dead, times ten grievously
wounded; over 100,000 Iraqi citizens dead, uncounted more wounded, with a recent
upsurge of violence claiming more than 200 lives in the last week alone; a nine-figure
pricetag that spirals ever-upwards by the day, mortgaging our children's future
for the profits of the few; no weapons of mass destruction anywhere in Iraq.
We need two exit strategies: one to get our forces out of that country as
soon as humanly possible, and the other to get George W. Bush out of the White
House and into a cellblock in The Hague. Save a bunk for Mr. Blair, too. Criminals
belong in prison.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William Rivers Pitt is a New York Times and internationally bestselling author
of two books: War
on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know and The
Greatest Sedition Is Silence. Join the discussions at his
blog forum.
-------
Go to Original Article >>>
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.
|