Untitled Document
A little fodder for those grumbling at the water cooler. The
Families and Work Institute just put out a new report (pdf)
entitled "Overwork in America" that deserves a bit of discussion. The
crucial findings: 44 percent of Americans are overworked using at least one of
three different measures, and those overworked employees have, on average, poorer
health and higher rates of clinical depression, both of which help to drive up
health care costs, as you'd expect. In other words, it's a real problem. Paradoxically,
it's the fact that workers have become so darn adept at navigating the 21st century
economy that's to blame here:
For those with too much to do, the Overwork in America study found that
the very skills that are fundamental to succeeding in the global economy—specifically,
moving quickly from task to task with little time for recovery in between,
facing many interruptions, and working outside normal work hours, including
vacations—can be useful but also can become detrimental. For a significant
group of Americans, the way we work today appears to be negatively affecting
their health and effectiveness at work.
The price of competence, you could say. As it turns out, though, it's difficult
to figure out how, exactly, to reverse these trends. The Institute found that
longer vacations usually don't translate into feeling less overworked, although
it does help if employees spend most of their vacation relaxing and enjoying
themselves, rather than keeping their thumbs mashed on the ol' Blackberry. (Incidentally,
employees here in the United States don't get very much quality vacation: only
14 percent of workers took two weeks or more for their longest break.) On the
more helpful side, the report suggests creating "more effective workplaces"—wherein
employees have opportunities to continue learning, can feel as if they're succeeding,
have the flexibility to juggle job and family life, etc. That's a bit vague,
but supposedly doing this sort of stuff in the right amounts helps decrease
overwork.
Okay. Then there's a broader question to ask here, namely: "What price
growth?" America is often lauded for its supercharged GDP, especially in
comparison to some of our more welfare-heavy, vacation-loving European peers,
but perhaps it's time to re-examine this assumption. For one, the usual comparisons
are a bit misleading: European GDP growth per capita has been roughly the same
as that in the U.S over the last decade—1.8 percent per year in the U.S.,
1.7 percent in the EU15. (Indeed, if you exclude Germany, which has had a number
of reunification-related problems, it becomes a very fair match.)
Nevertheless, the Francophobes have it partly right: Income per capita in Europe
remains at about 70 percent of the U.S. average. But this isn't because Europeans
are less productive—in fact, they're nearly as productive per hour as
Americans—but simply because they work fewer hours and take longer vacations.
And no, this isn't because crushing European tax rates discourage work; see
economist Olivier Blanchard's study on the subject. It's the result of a conscious
choice, trading off some private goods for fewer hours worked. Europeans end
up working about 40 percent fewer hours over their lifetime than we do. Now
there's no one correct way to decide whether we in the United States ought to
choose more free time or more stuff, but the Overwork in America report lays
out the case that the cost of working more and more hours can be quite high
indeed. One more reason to think the fetishization of growth above all else
may be the wrong way to think about things.
Go to Original Article >>>
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.
|