The umbilical cord is a baby’s lifeline, bringing nourishment
from the mother and removing waste. The amniotic fluid bathes the growing embryo,
and the umbilical cord brings the embryo oxygen, nutrients—and a startling
array of toxic industrial chemicals, according to a recent study, “Body
Burden: The Pollution in Newborns.”
In a first-of-its-kind study, researchers from two major laboratories
looked for the presence of toxic chemicals in umbilical cord blood of 10 newborn
babies born in U.S. hospitals in August and September 2004. A collaboration
of the Environmental Working Group and Commonweal brought about the study. (For
the full report, go to http://www.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/.)
Of the more than 400 chemicals tested for, 287 were detected in umbilical
cord blood. Of these, 180 cause cancer in humans or animals, 217 are toxic to
the brain or nervous system, and 208 cause birth defects or abnormal development
in animals. Scientists refer to the presence of such toxins in the newborn as
According to the study’s authors, the scope of testing was limited because
chemical companies are not required to divulge methods for detecting the presence
of their chemicals in the human body. “Had we tested for a broader array
of chemicals,” they wrote, “we would almost certainly have detected
far more than 287.”
Among those substances found to be polluting the blood supply for the newborn
babies were eight perfluorochemicals used as stain and oil repellants in fast-food
packaging, clothes and textiles, including the Teflon chemical PFQA, a carcinogen;
dozens of widely used bromated flame retardants and their toxic byproducts;
and many pesticides.
Publication of this study, despite its sensational findings, created barely
a ripple in the national media. There was no outcry from the Christian fundamentalists
against the poisoning of fetuses by the chemical industry, in sharp contrast
to their hysteria over abortion rights. The ultra-right fanatics demonize pregnant
teenagers and even the victims of rape and incest as “murderers”
for terminating their pregnancies. But it is apparently an article of faith
that corporate polluters should have the right to continue pumping out dangerous
chemicals that damage individuals and even generations, in the name of “free
This latest research was done to investigate the root causes of diseases caused
by chemicals with in-utero origins. Certain factors contribute to children’s
unique susceptibility to the dangerous effect of chemicals. An immature porous
blood-brain barrier in the fetus allows greater chemical exposures to the developing
brain; a developing child’s chemical exposures are greater pound-for-pound
than those of an adult; and systems that detoxify and excrete industrial chemicals
are not fully developed (National Academy of Sciences, 1993).
The difference between the effect of chemical exposure on adults and embryos
can be seen in the case of mercury exposure. In Minamata, Japan, in the 1950s,
poisonous mercury waste was dumped into a bay, contaminating the food chain.
Autopsies of adults revealed mercury-caused lesions in a few areas of the brain,
while in a fetus, lesions covered nearly the entire cortex.
Here is a summary from the report of the classes of chemical found in the babies’
umbilical cord. Many of them persist for decades in the environment and in people,
accumulate in the food chain and are lipophilic, that is, accumulate in fatty
tissue and fluids such as breast milk.
Chemicals and pollutants found in human umbilical cord
(Source: EWG study)
Tested for 1, found 1
|Pollutant from coal-fired power plants, mercury-containing
products, and certain industrial processes. Accumulates in seafood. Hurts
brain development and function.
|Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Tested for 18, found 9
|Pollutants from burning gasoline and garbage. Linked to cancer. Accumulate
in food chain.
|Polybrominated dibenzodioxins and furans (PBDD/F)
Tested for 12, found 7
|Contaminants in brominated flame retardants. Pollutants and byproducts
from plastic production and incineration. Accumulate in food chain. Toxic
to developing endocrine (hormone) system.
|Perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs)
Tested for 12, found 9
|Active ingredients or breakdown products of Teflon, Scotchgard, fabric
and carpet protectors, food packaging. Global contaminants. Accumulate in
the environment and the food chain, in meat, dairy, fish and eggs. Linked
to cancer, birth defects, and more.
|Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and furans (PBCD/F)
Tested for 17, found 11
|Pollutants, by-products of PVC production, industrial bleaching, and incineration.
Cause cancer in humans. Persist for decades in the environment. Very toxic
to developing endocrine (hormone) system.
|Organochlorine pesticides (OCs)
Tested for 28, found 21
|DDT, chlordane and other pesticides. Largely banned in the U.S. Persist
for decades in the environment. Accumulate up the food chain to man. Cause
cancer and numerous reproductive effects.
|Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs)
Tested for 46, found 32
|Flame retardant in furniture foam, computers, and televisions. Accumulates
in the food chain and human tissues. Adversely affects brain development
and the thyroid.
|Polychlorinated napthalenes (PCNs)
Tested for 70, found 50
|Wood preservatives, varnishes, machine-lubricating oils, waste incineration.
Formed during chlorination of drinking water. Common PCB contaminant. Contaminate
the food chain. Cause liver and kidney damage.
|Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Tested for 209, found 147
|Industrial insulators and lubricants. Banned in the U.S. in 1976. Persist
for decades in the environment. Accumulate up the food chain; in meat, dairy
and seafood. Cause cancer and nervous system problems.
Chemicals that may not show harmful effects a short time after exposure may
cause subtle changes in development that show up later in childhood as learning
or behavior problems or in adulthood as cancers or neurodegenerative disease.
Recent studies are beginning to look at how early chemical exposure can put
adult health at risk. Scientists from the University of Texas found that fetal
exposure to the synthetic hormone and now-banned drug DES permanently changed
body tissues and raised the rate of uterine cancer in later life in laboratory
Science understands and can control the spread of polio, smallpox, diphtheria
and other diseases that were scourges in the past. But less clear is the cause
of diseases on the increase over the last 30 years: asthma (100 percent increase
1982-1993), childhood brain cancer (40 percent increase 1973-1994), acute lymphocytic
leukemia (62 percent increase 1973-1999) and autism (1,000 percent increase
from early 1980s to 1996). Early life exposure to environmental toxins is certainly
One chemical studied in the laboratory is Deca, the common name for one of
three commercial fire retardants. It is added to plastics, computer monitors,
TV screens, and home appliances. People absorb the chemical from food they eat
and by ingesting small particles of it in their homes and worksites. When lab
animals were given one single exposure to Deca, it adversely impacted learning,
memory and behavior. As the animals aged, the effects grew worse. The period
of greatest sensitivity to the chemical correlates to the third trimester of
human pregnancy, when the brain of the fetus is rapidly growing.
One of the most sobering sections of the report examines what impact the exposure
of the embryo to these hundreds of toxins will have in future generations. The
researchers explain that besides genetic mutations—that is, physical changes
in gene structure—there can be epigenetic changes that can silence or
activate a gene (turn it permanently off or on) in a way that can be inherited.
Such epigenetic changes have been linked to the fungicide vinclozolin and pesticide
methoxychlor, which impaired sperm counts and sperm motility among animals in
the womb and for three subsequent generations.
Lack of government regulation
Besides the fact that procedures to find chemicals in the fetus
are difficult, there is another major problem in tracking the effects on people.
Business has virtually free rein in its use of deadly toxins. US industries
manufacture and import about 75,000 chemicals, using 3,000 of them at the rate
of more than a million pounds a year. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
the federal government’s regulatory agency, does not require that these
chemicals be tested for safety before they flood the environment.
The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), a federal law passed in 1976, approved
as safe the 63,000 chemicals in use at the time. The law requires that the government
approve new chemicals within 90 days of a company request, with companies requesting
approval for about seven new chemicals a day. The law has no teeth, requiring
only that the EPA negotiate with industry or complete a formal “test rule”
for each individual study it wants. Needless to say, not many studies are done
before chemicals are put on the market.
Even when companies agree voluntarily to test a chemical, large parts of their
reports submitted to the EPA, including health and safety findings, are redacted
as business secrets and can’t be reviewed. In addition, the EPA takes
years to review information submitted by industry.
For example, recently, research has raised concerns about the effect of Perfluorooctanoic
acid (PFOA), used in the manufacture of nonstick cookware such as Teflon, and
many other applications. The EPA began an extensive review of PFOA in 2003.
It had to file a lawsuit over DuPont’s alleged suppression of information
on health studies. Most data on it has not been made available to the public.
Reams of information have been given to the EPA, and it is just getting to processing
these documents, as this potentially dangerous chemical continues to be massively
The TSCA requires that if use of a chemical is risky, top priority must be
to minimize the costs to industry for any action. The act does not allow the
EPA to require that the industry keep chemicals off the market as a precaution
to protect public health. Rather, the chemicals have to be proven unsafe first.
Since PCBs and DDT were banned in the 1970s, few chemicals have been regulated
to make sure millions of people are protected from their effects.
The paltry environmental regulations that exist are being aggressively undermined
by the Bush administration. Advisory committees to government agencies such
as the EPA are rife with corporate executives, and polluters produce their own
“scientific” studies that claim the dangerous chemicals they use
are safe for the environment.