Untitled Document
Is it possible the people of Israel will select Binyamin Netanyahu to be their
prime minister again? Like America, in Israel the far right is in firm control
of the horizontal and vertical, and in Israel as America the ruling clique is
of a particularly rabid Zionist persuasion, unflinching in their warmongering
assertions.
For instance, Netanyahu, affectionately nicknamed Bibi, tells us if he “succeeds
in becoming Israel’s next prime minister … he will not hesitate
to order a military strike against Iran’s nuclear program in order to
safeguard his nation from annihilation,” according to MichNews.
Notice how the assumptions are stacked up like cordwood against a brutal winter—not
only does Netanyahu take for granted Iran has nuclear weapons (or is about to
have them), a less than factual assertion, but he also believes if Iran possesses
nukes it will most certainly annihilate Israel. Netanyahu would have us believe
Iran is not only genocidal and insane, but suicidal as well.
“I will continue the tradition established by Menachem Begin, who did
not allow Iraq to develop such a nuclear threat against Israel, and by a daring
and courageous act gave us two decades of tranquility,” Netanyahu told
Israel’s Maariv daily.
Indeed, Begin attacked Iraq—and earned the condemnation of the world
for doing so, not that the Zionists particularly care what the rest of the world
thinks (unless the money—much of it holocaust guilt trip money—stops
coming in). Imagine the response if the Iraqis had invaded Israel’s Dimona
nuclear complex in the Negev. But then, of course, the Israelis consider themselves
civilized European people—or the Ashkenazi Jews do anyway—and the
Arabs (and the Iranians) are uncivilized and sub-human and as Bibi tells us
given half the chance they will nuke Israel.
In fact, as defense Israeli analyst Zeev
Schiff told Haaretz: “Too many senior Israeli officials have taken
to issuing threatening statements vis-a-vis Iraq and Iran…. Off-the-cuff
Israeli nuclear threats have become a problem, even before the onset of the
Iraqi crisis…. Washington may decide it wants to distance itself from
Israel in order to avoid being accused of having conspired with us on an action
we planned exclusively by ourselves.” In other words, according to an
analyst who should know, the problem is not Iran but is in fact the racist state
of Israel, bristling with modern nuclear weapons and the appropriate delivery
technology.
As Livia
Rokach (daughter of Israel Rokach, Minister of the Interior in the government
of Moshe Sharett, second prime minister of Israel) spelled out in her book,
Israel’s Sacred Terrorism, the “Israeli political /military establishment
never seriously believed in an Arab threat to the existence of Israel. On the
contrary, it sought and applied every means to exacerbate the dilemma of the
Arab regimes after the 1948 war. The Arab governments were extremely reluctant
to engage in any military confrontation with Israel, yet in order to survive
they needed to project to their populations and to the exiled Palestinians in
their countries some kind of reaction to Israel’s aggressive policies
and continuous acts of harassment. In other words, the Arab threat was an Israeli-invented
myth which for internal and inter-Arab reasons the Arab regimes could not completely
deny, though they constantly feared Israeli preparations for a new war.”
Bibi Netanyahu, as a staunch Jabotinsky Zionist, is playing this old game with
Iran.
Of course, Bibi will not go it alone—he has the support and goading (not
that he needs much) of the American dual loyalty neocons, the Zionist mafia
currently in control of U.S. foreign policy. “The ultimate neocon goal
is a U.S. war with Iran over the nuclear issue,” writes Andrew
I. Killgore for the Washington Report On Middle Eastern Affairs, “That
would serve to postpone indefinitely Washington’s attention to the Palestine
question. In ‘A Clean Break: A New Strategy For Securing the Realm,’
the 1996 white paper prepared for Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu
by the neocons/Zionists Richard Perle, David Wurmser and Douglas Feith, the
authors envisaged America fighting Israel’s enemies in the Middle East.
It contained not a word about the consequences for the United States—raising
a question about the judgment, if not the loyalty, of the three authors.”
Not that “consequences for the United States” mean squat to the
neocon traitors. As it now stands, Bibi will probably not be Israel’s
next prime minister. However, Netanyahu is sending a message to the neocons—Iran
is still on the table, front and center, and it is up to America to secure Israel’s
nuclear monopoly and sow chaos amidst the Muslims, as per the long-held neocon
master plan. Call it a punctual reminder. Of course, the neocons have not forgotten
and they will not be dissuaded from calling for mass murder and yet more crimes
perpetuated against humanity. It remains to be seen if they can pull it off
with the Bush’s Iraq political fiasco pickle (although the plan in Iraq
is going as envisioned—destroy Iraqi society for a generation or more,
as the Zionists demand).
But then Bush is limping toward the curtains of his second and last (we can
only hope) term and he really has nothing to lose in regard to Iran.
It may be bombs away as the Zionists in Israel and Washington demand. One thing
is for sure—Israel is not stupid enough to attack Iran on its own, as
Bibi threatens, invoking the execrable memory of Menachem Begin, who was so
pleased with his blood-spattered historical record of slaughtering 20,000 or
more Lebanese and Palestinians he characterized the killing fields to a “new
Treblinka,” thus revealing precisely the sort of sociopathic killers allowed
to rule nations and decide the fate of millions.