Internet censorship. It did not happen overnight but slowly came to
America's shores from testing grounds in China and the Middle East.
Progressive and investigative journalist web site administrators are beginning
to talk to each other about it, e-mail users are beginning to understand why
their e-mail is being disrupted by it, major search engines appear to be complying
with it, and the low to equal signal-to-noise ratio of legitimate e-mail and
spam appears to be perpetuated by it.
In this case, “it,” is what privacy and computer experts have long
warned about: massive censorship of the web on a nationwide and global scale.
For many years, the web has been heavily censored in countries around the world.
That censorship continues at this very moment. Now it is happening right here
The agreement by the Congress to extend an enhanced Patriot Act for another
four years will permit the political enforcers of the Bush administration, who
use law enforcement as their proxies, to further clamp censorship controls on
The warning signs for the crackdown on the web have been with us for over a decade.
The Clipper chip controversy of the 90s, John Poindexter’s Total Information
Awareness (TIA) system pushed in the aftermath of 9-11, backroom deals between
the Federal government and the Internet service industry, and the Patriot Act
have ushered in a new era of Internet censorship, something just half a decade
ago computer programmers averred was impossible given the nature of the web. They
were wrong, dead wrong.
Take for example of what recently occurred when two journalists were taking
on the phone about a story that appeared on Google News. The story was about
a Christian fundamentalist move in Congress to use U.S. military force in Sudan
to end genocide in Darfur. The story appeared on the English Google News site
in Qatar. But the very same Google News site when accessed simultaneously in
Washington, DC failed to show the article. This censorship is accomplished by
geolocation filtering: the restriction or modifying of web content based on
the geographical region of the user. In addition to countries, such filtering
can now be implemented for states, cities, and even individual IP addresses.
With reports in the Swedish newspaper Svensa Dagbladet today that the United
States has transmitted a Homeland Security Department "no fly" list
of 80,000 suspected terrorists to airport authorities around the world, it is
not unreasonable that a "no [or restricted] surfing/emailing" list
has been transmitted to Internet Service Providers around the world. The systematic
disruptions of web sites and email strongly suggests that such a list exists.
News reports on CIA prisoner flights and secret prisons are disappearing from
Google and other search engines like Alltheweb as fast as they appear. Here
now, gone tomorrow is the name of the game.
Google is systematically failing to list and link to articles that
contain explosive information about the Bush administration, the war in Iraq,
Al Qaeda, and U.S. political scandals. But Google is not alone in working closely
to stifle Internet discourse. America On Line, Microsoft, Yahoo and others are
slowly turning the Internet into an information superhighway dominated by barricades,
toll booths, off-ramps that lead to dead ends, choke points, and security checks.
America On Line is the most egregious is stifling Internet freedom. A former
AOL employee noted how AOL and other Internet Service Providers cooperate with
the Bush administration in censoring email. The Patriot Act gave federal agencies
the power to review information to the packet level and AOL was directed by
agencies like the FBI to do more than sniff the subject line. The AOL term of
service (TOS) has gradually been expanded to grant AOL virtually universal power
regarding information. Many AOL users are likely unaware of the elastic clause,
which says they will be bound by the current TOS and any TOS revisions which
AOL may elect at any time in the future. Essentially, AOL users once agreed
to allow the censorship and non-delivery of their email.
Microsoft has similar requirements for Hotmail as do Yahoo and Google for their
respective e-mail services.
There are also many cases of Google’s search engine failing to list and
link to certain information. According to a number of web site administrators
who carry anti-Bush political content, this situation has become more pronounced
in the last month. In addition, many web site administrators are reporting a
dramatic drop-off in hits to their sites, according to their web statistic analyzers.
Adding to their woes is the frequency at which spam viruses are being spoofed
as coming from their web site addresses.
Government disruption of the political side of the web can easily be hidden
amid hyped mainstream news media reports of the latest "boutique"
viruses and worms, reports that have more to do with the sales of anti-virus
software and services than actual long-term disruption of banks, utilities,
Internet Censorship in the US: No Longer a Prediction
Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, and Cisco Systems have honed their skills at Internet
censorship for years in places like China, Jordan, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, the
United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, and other countries. They have learned well.
They will be the last to admit they have imported their censorship skills into
the United States at the behest of the Bush regime. Last year, the Bush-Cheney
campaign blocked international access to its web site -- www.georgewbush.com
-- for unspecified "security reasons."
Only those in the Federal bureaucracy and the companies involved are in a position
to know what deals have been made and how extensive Internet censorship has
become. They owe full disclosure to their customers and their fellow citizens.