The company implies as much
Diebold would rather lose all of its voting machine business in North
Carolina than open its source code to state election officials as required by
law, the Associated Press reports.
Due to irregularities in the 2004 election traced to touch screen terminals,
North Carolina has taken the very reasonable precaution of requiring vendors
of electronic voting gizmos to place all of the source code in escrow. Diebold
has objected to the possibility of criminal sanctions if they fail to comply,
and argued for an exemption before Wake County Superior Court Judge Narley Cashwell.
The judge declined to issue an exemption, and Diebold has concluded that it
has no choice but withdraw from the state.
The company's explanation is that their machines contain Microsoft software,
which they have no right to make available to state election officials. This
seems disingenuous, as it is hard to imagine Microsoft suing Diebold for complying
with the law. It would hardly be Diebold's fault if it released MS code to a
lawful authority on demand; that issue would be something for MS and North Carolina
to work out.
One far-fetched explanation would be that MS has licensed its software to Diebold
with a provision that the company withdraw from jurisdictions where the law
requires the release of its source code. It's possible, but there's no reason
to believe it.
A considerably more plausible explanation is that Diebold is using this non-problem
as an excuse to keep its bugware from the prying eyes of government regulators.
And the most likely reason for that is that they've got a lot of blunders to
hide. If North Carolina were to reject the machines on the basis of their software,
other states would undoubtedly become suspicious, and begin doing their own
investigations. So in that case, withdrawing from the market is the smartest
move the company can make.
But if the software is as good as the company claims, then North Carolina's
future endorsement will make for excellent free advertising. Withdrawing from
the market would be a very foolish move in that case, but, again, only if Diebold
has nothing to hide.