Untitled Document
The ATM card of Waleed Iskandar was returned to his parents, allegedly
found by the Ground Zero Recovery Team on Sept. 11, 2002. Questions remain as
to why it turned up a year later and how could such a flimsy card survive such
a towering inferno?
One year after 9/11, as unbelievable as it sounds, the parents of a Flight
11 passenger were notified by the Ground Zero Recovery Team that they found
the unscathed Wells Fargo ATM card of their son who allegedly perished on the
doomed flight.
After being notified of the miraculous find on Sept. 11, 2002, Joseph and Samia
Iskandar were sent their son’s bank card within days, noting it was in
“perfect condition,” but asking the obvious question: “How
could a plastic card survive the fire of the terrorist attack of the Black Tuesday
on the USA?”
The question about the strange return of their son’s bank card has been
placed on a web site memorial, remembering their 34-year-old son, Waleed, a
Harvard MBA graduate listed as one of the passengers that perished when Flight
11 allegedly smashed into the North Tower.
The Iskandar’s were unavailable for comment after numerous calls were
not answered, but receipt of the card was verified by another close family member,
as well as a photographic duplicate of the ATM card also being placed on the
Iskandar web site, proving its existence and return in almost perfect condition.
Besides an enlarged picture of the card on the site, the Iskandar’s also
placed the following message regarding the return of their son, Waleed’s,
Wells Fargo ATM card:
“On September 11 2002, one year Anniversary of the death of our son,
we were informed that the Recovery Team at Ground Zero have found the ATM Bank
card of Waleed and that it will be mailed to us in Northridge. When we received
it, we found it in good condition,” Walleed’s parents wrote.
“How could a plastic card survive the fire of the terrorist attack of
the Black Tuesday on the USA? I consider it as a sign from Waleed to his parents
on the first Anniversary of his loss.”
What the Iskandar’s mean by “a sign from Waleed” is unknown,
but it can either be construed as a miracle from heaven that he is safely in
a better place, a sign that his personal belongings were tampered with and he
died in another location or a sign he is still alive but unable to communicate
with his parents.
Although it’s impossible to come to a solid conclusion, the ‘ government
spooks’ of 9/11 holding the real truth, no one including the Iskandar’s
can doubt the miraculous nature of such a recovery, considering the devastation
at the WTC, as well as strange nature of the timing of the return of their son’s
bank card, occurring one year after the fact.
One observer who wants to remain anonymous and who claims the FBI planted numerous
pieces of bogus evidence at all locations on 9/11 to justify an equally bogus
official 9/11 story, had this to say about the Iskandar ATM card:
“I guess his ATM card must have slid out of his wallet, flown
out of his pocket, then out of his seat and around the seat belt, then through
the exploding jet fuel and debris, out of the building, then to be found picture
perfect!”
The miraculous recovery of Iskandar’s ATM card is not the only piece
of 9/11 evidence suspected of being planted by the FBI. Recently, the Arctic
Beacon first reported a first responder at the Pentagon finding a perfectly
intact California ID card of one of the alleged Flight 77 passengers.
Capt. Jim Ingledue said two days after 9/11 he found the perfectly unscathed
ID of Susanne Calley, 42, one of the alleged passengers, adding he thought the
find “highly unusual and strange to find a perfectly intact card amidst
the devastation and rubble at the Pentagon.”
But what makes the Iskandar ATM card even more suspicious and intriguing than
even Calley’s ID card is that it was returned one year later. Why one
year after the fact? Where was it found? Was it used in the interim? But, most
importantly, how on earth could a plastic card, normally contained inside a
man’s wallet or his pocket, survive a massive explosion that completed
consumed an airliner as well as pulverized a 100 story skyscraper?
However, besides the possibility that Calley’s ID and Iskandar’s
ATM card were both planted by the FBI, the same question was also ignored by
the press and authorities the day after 9/11 when miraculously the unscathed
passport of Satam Al Suqami, one of the alleged 19 Arab terrorists, turned up
several blocks from Ground Zero.
Although ABC News and the Associated Press played up the importance of the
Suqami passport, linking 9/11 to the Arab hijackers, serious questions were
never raised in the press or by the 9/11 Commission as to the credibility and
authenticity of the find.
And now with the Calley ID and the Iskandar ATM card, both turning up in perfect
condition like the passport, it only triples the necessity of launching a full
scale investigation into the possibility that all three items were planted by
the FBI in an attempt to hoodwink the American people into believing the official
9/11 story, a story that has so many holes that it makes a perfectly good piece
of Swiss cheese look like a solid object.
Furthermore, the simple reason an investigation is desperately needed, now
more than ever in light of the Calley and Iskandar discoveries, is that the
more pieces of “miracle evidence” that surface, the better the chances
the evidence is bogus.
Besides the Al Suqami passport, numerous other accounts of suspicious evidence
have conveniently surfaced linking the alleged hijackers to 9/11, including
two of the alleged ringleader, Mohamed Atta's bags also found right after 9/11.
Not only did authorities find the bags but they conveniently contained a handheld
electronic flight computer, a simulator procedures manual for Boeing 757 and
767 aircraft, two videotapes relating to “air tours” of the Boeing
757 and 747 aircraft, a slide-rule flight calculator, a copy of the Koran, Atta's
passport, his will, his international driver's license, a religious cassette
tape, airline uniforms, a letter of recommendation, “education related
documentation” and a note to other hijackers on how to mentally prepare
for the hijacking.
Again the state sponsored media jumped on the story, running in the Associated
Press, Boston Globe and other papers in the weeks following 9/11, further perpetuating
the government’s 9/11 myth without even asking the obvious question:
“If the hijackers could pull off the perfect crime, fooling the entire
U.S. military, how could they be so stupid and leave such incriminating evidence
behind unless it was planted and set up by the FBI/CIA/Mossad agents?”