Untitled Document
“The U.S. public is deeply skeptical about the priority President George
W. Bush has put on promoting democracy abroad, and its experience in Iraq has
made it more so, according to a detailed new survey released Thursday by the
Chicago Council on Foreign Relations (CCFR) and the Program on International
Policy Attitudes (PIPA) of the University of Maryland,” writes Jim
Lobe. “Only 35 percent of the 808 randomly selected respondents said
they favored the use of military force to overthrow dictators, and 74 percent,
including 60 percent of self-identified Republicans, said the goal of overthrowing
the Ba’athist regime in Iraq and installing democracy there was not a
good enough reason for going to war.”
In the upside down realm of Bushzarro world, the CFR runs “polls”
on democracy, assuming the invasion of Iraq was about “installing democracy,”
when in fact this was nothing less than a second choice excuse following the
preferred excuse about Saddam’s non-existent weapons of mass destruction.
Bush and crew have no intention of “installing democracy” in Iraq
and it is amazing large numbers of Americans believe this, especially after
scads of evidence to the contrary.
As a cursory examination of history reveals, the United States government
and military have never been in the business of “installing democracy”
and in fact have consistently strived for the exact opposite.
Since the end of World War 2, the United States has used military intervention
in over 70 nations—and not for the sake of freedom and democracy (see
William Blum’s A
Brief History of U.S. Interventions:1945 to the Present).
So freedom-loving was the United States at the close of the Second World War,
it used Japanese soldiers—sworn enemies mere months before—to fight
against the Communists in China, who were in fact allied with the United States
during the war.
In 1947, the U.S. interfered in the elections in Italy to prevent the Communist
Party from coming to power through democratic elections. “For the next
few decades, the CIA, along with American corporations, continued to intervene
in Italian elections, pouring in hundreds of millions of dollars and much psychological
warfare to block the specter that was haunting Europe,” writes Blum.
In this same period, the U.S. conspired with fascists in Greece to install
a brutal regime and the CIA worked with the Greeks to set up the KYP, a secret
police.
In the Philippines, the U.S. fought against the Huks and field tested many
covert and psychological counter-insurgency tactics subsequently used in Vietnam
and still used today in Iraq and elsewhere.
In Iran in 1953, the U.S. conspired against the democratically elected government
of Mossadegh. “Mossadegh had been elected to his position by a large majority
of parliament, but he had made the fateful mistake of spearheading the movement
to nationalize a British-owned oil company, the sole oil company operating in
Iran,” writes Blum. “The coup restored the Shah to absolute power
and began a period of 25 years of repression and torture, with the oil industry
being restored to foreign ownership, as follows: Britain and the U.S., each
40 percent, other nations 20 percent.” Iran’s current reactionary
Islamic government is a direct result of this Anglo-American interference, although
you never hear about this as the corporate media complains about Iranian terrorism
and supposed desire to build nuclear weapons.
In the 1950s, the CIA conspired to overthrow the democratically elected government
of Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala, “initiating 40 years of death-squads, torture,
disappearances, mass executions, and unimaginable cruelty, totaling well over
100,000 victims,” as Blum notes. Arbenz had made the mistake of nationalizing
the United Fruit Company.
Also in the 1950s, the United States used the Eisenhower Doctrine to intervene
in the Middle East, attempting to overthrow the Syrian government, landed 14,000
troops in Lebanon, and connived to overthrow the nationalist Nasser of Egypt.
In Indonesia, the U.S. took out Sukarno, who gained independence from the Netherlands,
and installed Suharto, a sadistic general who was responsible (with the help
of the CIA) for slaughtering between 100,000 to 1.5 million Indonesians.
Vietnam is well-known: 3 million or so people killed, including 58,000 U.S.
soldiers.
Nixon carpet-bombed Cambodia and his successful plot to overthrow Prince Sihanouk
led to the ascension of Pol Pot and the genocidal Khmer Rouge. One-third or
more of the Cambodian population was systematically liquidated through mass
murder and starvation.
In June, 1960, the CIA had Patrice Lumumba assassinated in the Congo (reportedly
on the direct orders of Dwight Eisenhower) and Mobutu Sese Seko was installed.
“Mobutu went on to rule the country for more than 30 years, with a level
of corruption and cruelty that shocked even his CIA handlers. The Zairian people
lived in abject poverty despite the plentiful natural wealth, while Mobutu became
a multibillionaire,” explains Blum.
In Brazil, Dominican Republic, Chile, Nicaragua, Grenada, Panama, and El Salvador—all
across the Caribbean and Latin and South America, the U.S. enthusiastically
supported dictators and made sure peasants, labor and community organizers,
and even Catholic priests suffered torture and horrible deaths. Since the 1950s,
the U.S. has waged a covert war against the people of Cuba. 75,000 civilians
died in El Salvador alone and Henry Kissinger intervened on behalf of multinational
corporations against the democratically elected leader of Chile.
And then of course there was Afghanistan and Iraq. If the CIA and military
intelligence learned a lot deceiving and killing Huks in the Philippines, they
really cut their teeth in the art of creating terrorist organizations in Afghanistan.
In Iraq, after invading the country and ruthlessly and systematically destroying
the civilian infrastructure, the U.S. imposed barbaric sanctions on the country,
killing more than a million Iraqis over the period of a decade, half of them
defenseless children.
Does this sound like a government “installing democracy” to you?
Of course, most Americans are completely clueless about all of this
because it is not mentioned on Fox News or the History Channel. So when the
CFR calls to ask questions for one of their surveys, instead of laughing in
their face—when asked if invading Iraq (a second time) to install “democracy”
was a worthwhile endeavor—Americans reveal their immense ignorance and
demonstrate for the world not only how clueless they are but dangerous as well.