Untitled Document
The communist party is trying to cover up the scandal of the 'lost boys'
stolen for profit, writes Michael Sheridan
The faces of China’s lost boys stare out from hundreds of pictures that
once captured joy but now serve only to remind their parents of a cruel loss
of innocence.
A plague of kidnapping has swept across Yunnan, a remote southwestern province,
claiming hundreds of boys from the city of Kunming alone.
One vanished while his father bought sweets. Two more were led away in broad
daylight from a busy market. The children have gone from poor townships and
rural farms. They are the sons of China’s working class but their fate
has been covered up on the orders of the Communist party.
“As of the end of 2004 there were more than 200 boys missing
from Kunming city alone,” said Lu Youmin, a businessman, who has emerged
as leader of a group of bereft parents fighting for action.
The motive is greed. Gangs of traffickers snatch the children to sell
to childless couples in the prosperous cities of coastal China, where they will
be passed off as “adopted”.
Lu is an exception. The kidnappers took his daughter Lu Shanni, then aged eight,
in 2002. But 95% of the stolen children are boys, prized because they will carry
on the family line.
It is a well organised trade that the state is plainly unable to stop. Official
propaganda highlights the occasional police success. Yet there is no helpline,
no nationwide appeal, no television broadcast with pictures of the missing.
Instead, a Sunday Times inquiry has found that police have refused to investigate
cases and have harassed families who dared to complain. The official preoccupation
with silencing publicity about the kidnappings may stem from embarrassment.
A United Nations report shows that three years ago the authorities were warned
about the surge in boy abductions. They have done little, if anything, to curb
it.
Last week as Sha Zukang, the Chinese ambassador in Geneva, was defending the
country’s record on child protection before a UN committee, police in
Kunming arrested parents who tried to contact this newspaper for help in searching
for their missing sons.
Some were infants, some toddlers, some were taking their first rides on swings
or in plastic cars before they were abducted. The Sunday Times has seen the
names, photographs and other details in more than 60 cases. All remain unsolved.
Most of the victims were poor. They were the sons of impoverished migrant
workers who exist at the bottom of the heap in China with neither the money
nor the political connections needed to get help.
Most of the perpetrators, the people who buy the boys, are wealthy.
They can pay up to £3,500 for a child. They are the shame-free rich class
of post-revolutionary China.
The pain inflicted by their selfishness is written on the face of Pu Caiju,
32, whose son, Li Shang, was four when he vanished outside the family’s
village home on March 14, 2002.
She and several other parents risked official wrath to be interviewed in central
Kunming. “My husband had been playing with our son and he said, ‘Just
stay here while I go upstairs for a cold drink’. He was away not five
minutes but when he came back our son was gone,” she said.
Sixty villagers joined the hunt, scouring the bus station, the alleys, the
back yards. Then they went to the police.
“The police just weren’t interested,” said Pu. “They
told us to come back if we hadn’t found him in 24 hours. We suspected
that a neighbour, who was a drug user, may have been involved but the police
didn’t want to know.”
Pu’s husband went all over southern China to try to find their son. Then
he had a breakthrough. In a rare, well- publicised success, the police had caught
a gang of 11 child traffickers. “My husband was allowed to confront one
of the suspects with a photograph of our son and the man said, yes, he had sold
him very easily because our son was so smart,” Pu said.
But the parents’ hope that the traffickers could lead them to the missing
children was abruptly cut short after their trial and conviction. Keen to impress
the public and central government with their zeal, the authorities swiftly executed
nine of the 11, including the man who had confessed to selling Pu’s son.
“The police had found out very little before they were executed,”
Pu said. “All the families were horrified.”
If Pu, like many Chinese people, conceals her emotions behind a mask, that
effort must have been doubly difficult for the woman who sat next to her.
Luo Qin, 28, lost her two sons, Wang Tao, then aged eight, and Wang Wei, then
five, on October 1, 2003.
“I was at work, so was my husband, and the boys were playing with a neighbour’s
child,” she said. “When my husband came home, another neighbour
said the three had been just outside 15 minutes earlier — but they had
gone.”
The third child, Pan Kunkun, aged five, was also abducted. The families went
to the police only to be met with the same response. “They said, ‘Don’t
bother us. Come back in 24 hours if you can’t find them’,”
said Luo.
She and Pu were asked whether they would think about having another child.
They shook their heads in unison. “We don’t want other children.
We want our children back,” Luo said. For all the parents a lost child
seems frozen in time. They speak of their sons as if they were still the same
age as on the day they disappeared.
None wants to face the reality that the infant they nurtured may be growing
up in a more comfortable home, far away, forgetting his real family.
Ai Feng Xin, a 40-year-old vegetable seller, shares Luo’s double burden
of guilt. His two sons, Ai Yu and Ai Qin, aged four and two at the time, vanished
from a Kunming market in the few minutes he needed to park his three-wheeled
vehicle.
“We suspected a man in the market but the police let him go. First they
wouldn’t register the case properly. Then they wouldn’t give me
a blood test for identification because I didn’t have the registration
papers,” he said.
Ai is so angry that he shouts answers to questions and has no fear of the police.
“I suspect some of them are in league with the smugglers,” he charged.
The one-child policy enforced by the state complicates the issue. It penalises
the parents who have lost their boys and gives a huge incentive to couples prepared
to do anything for a son.
It imposed a harsh irony on Reng Zhongquan, 38, a quietly spoken tailor, who
already had a teenage daughter when his wife found she was pregnant with their
son, Reng Pan.
“We wanted to keep him, of course, so we paid the fine of 10,000 yuan
(£696) and got him official papers,” recalled Reng.
Reng Pan vanished on September 9, 2003, aged five, while his father was buying
sweets at a stall one minute’s walk from their apartment.
“We called the police emergency number but nobody came. Eventually they
registered the case but they wouldn’t even question the neighbours,”
Reng said. “Now we families must stick together.”
The families did stick together. Even as victims of crime, it was a risk to
take. So when Lu discovered that hundreds of families shared his grief, he was
surprised to find out at the same time that their rage transcended their fear
of offending the state.
They united to lobby the Kunming police for action. They pleaded with Chinese
reporters to publicise their losses. In the end they did what Chinese dissatisfied
with local officials have done since imperial times: they spent hard-earned
savings to travel to Beijing in order to take their complaint to the seat of
government.
The response was a standard mix of propaganda, blandishment and threat. The
police announced arrests. The press dutifully recorded the crackdown. The problem
was declared to be in hand. The families were told to stop disturbing everybody.
There was, it seems, not enough manpower to devote to a serious search for
the boys. Yet when Kunming hosted a pompous “summit” for business
executives last summer, the police found sufficient resources to go door to
door to warn the parents against causing any public embarrassment.
Nobody could claim the Chinese authorities had not been alerted to the danger
posed by the kidnap gangs years ago.
In 2002 the local police, security officials and social services all co-operated
in a report by the UN’s International Labour Organisation into people
trafficking in Yunnan. It estimated that 1,000 women and children were snatched
every year from the province.
“Since the 1980s, trafficking in women and children in China has grown
at an alarming rate,” the report found. Most stolen infant boys were sold
for adoption, it concluded: “In many cases the victims have never been
heard from again.”
The report warned that traffickers were increasingly resorting to kidnapping
because it was becoming more difficult to find peasants ready to sell a child.
It described a chain of criminals who bought and sold children. It spoke of
girls forced into prostitution and small boys being trained as beggars. Officials
estimated that 338 organised human trafficking gangs were at work in Yunnan,
where 43m people live.
The UN recommended a government campaign to raise awareness, monitor vulnerable
migrant districts and increase the punishment for those who buy children from
the current maximum of three years in jail.
Last week the Kunming police were certainly on the alert. On Thursday morning
Ai Feng Xin, Pu Caiju and the husband of Luo Qin were on their way to join a
dozen parents willing to tell their stories. They and three others were arrested
as they left their homes. The police ordered them not to speak to foreigners
and forbade them to gather together. They were detained until the evening.
On Friday, one of the parents called from a payphone that could not be monitored
by the police. The message was simple. “Thank you for coming to listen
to us,” the parent said, “We thought nobody cared.”