Untitled Document
Taking a Closer Look at the Stories Ignored by the Corporate Media
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact

NEWS
All News
9-11
Corporatism
Disaster in New Orleans
Economics
Environment
Globalization
Government / The Elite
Human Rights
International Affairs
Iraq War
London Bombing
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism
Miscellaneous

COMMENTARY
All Commentaries
9-11
CIA
Corporatism
Economics
Government / The Elite
Imperialism
Iraq War
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism

SEARCH/ARCHIVES
Advanced Search
View the Archives

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly

CORPORATISM -
-

Wal-Mart in court over right to stop for lunch

Posted in the database on Wednesday, September 21st, 2005 @ 19:30:49 MST (1231 views)
by David Usborne    The Independent  

Untitled Document

Wal-Mart, the world's largest discount retailer and owner of Asda supermarkets in Britain, faced new legal difficulties yesterday as jurors in a California court heard claims that the company denied employees lunch breaks and forced them to work overtime without compensation.

The case being heard in an Oakland court has been brought on behalf of 115,919 current and former Wal-Mart employees. Fred Furth, the lawyer for the plaintiffs, said that for years most employees dared not ask management about missed meal breaks. "Some of the braver ones did ask, and I'm going to prove Wal-Mart ignored their pleas to hire more help," he said.

The trial comes at a time when the Arkansas-based company is already grappling with some 40 different legal actions to do with its employment policies. Most daunting is a pending class-action suit claiming the company routinely paid female workers less than male workers.

Only last week, a workers' rights advocacy group, the International Labour Rights Fund, said it filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles against Wal-Mart on behalf of hundreds of workers abroad who wereexploited by companies supplying goods to the retailer.

In that suit, Wal-Mart is accused of ignoring the abuse of workers in foreign factories because of its desire to find cheap supplies. The company, like many other retailers, has established its own code of conduct to guard against abuse.

Terry Collingsworth of the Labour Rights Fund said the case would be a test of whether codes of conduct drafted by corporations such as Wal-Mart were "simply public relations devices or whether they mean what they say". The suit describes a woman in Bangladesh who worked from 7.45am to 10pm and was not given a day off in six months.

In Quebec a government labour relations board found against Wal-Mart this week for closing down a store outside the town of Jonquiere. The company said the outlet was not profitable, but board members suggested the real reason was because workers had successfully unionised there and Wal-Mart was not prepared to deal with unionised employees. The company faces a large fine.

These legal entanglements amount to a public relations nightmare for Wal-Mart, which in recent months has met resistance in trying to open in new locations, notably in New York City and Los Angeles.



Go to Original Article >>>

The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly




Untitled Document
Disclaimer
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact
Copyright 2005 Looking Glass News.