Untitled Document
The Model for 'removing' skyscrapers is the Penzer Building in Detroit, courtesy
of Controlled Demolition, Inc. Notice the yellow enclosed area showing some
of the cutter charges that demolished ALL of the support columns on one floor.
The total weight of the unsupported structure hammered the building to the ground
after the core structure was blown to pieces:
In the RENSE article, Dirty Little 9/11 Secrets Exposed
http://www.rense.com/general66/dirt.htm
Among the litany of 9/11 exposures is the SEQUENCE of the
White Jet's arrival from its destruction of alleged Flight 93 in Pennsylvania
to finish off the North Tower, Trip #3 to the Big Apple on 9/11:
The above Dirty Little 9/11 Secrets Exposed RENSE article
mentioned the crackerjack investigation of 9/11 by Hustler publisher Larry Flynt
and his investigators, Carolyn Sinclair and David Bruce. Find the front page
article scan of the great photos:
http://www.total911.info/2005/06/flynts-hustler-runs-911-truth-expose.html
For those who missed the 9/11 Collector's Edition of Hustler magazine, Larry
Flynt is making the article (without photos!) available at www.larryflynt.com:
http://www.larryflynt.com/notebook.php?id=100
COMPARE the clouds of the cutter charges at the North Tower
FEMA, the Federal Government agency that covered up the OKC bombing, arrived
in NYC on 9/10 claims:
Review of videotape recordings of the collapse taken from various angles indicates
that the transmission tower on top of the structure began to move downward and
laterally slightly before movement was evident at the exterior walls. This suggests
that collapse began with one or more failures in the central core area of the
building.
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/wtc_ch2.htm
FEMA claims in their conclusion:
The fire-performance of steel trusses with spray-applied fire protection, and
with end restraint conditions similar to those present in the two towers, is
not well understood, but is likely critical to the building collapse.
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/wtc_ch2.htm
In a Nutshell, FEMA is claiming trusses that supported the
floors were not solidly attached to their end supports, the exterior wall and
the interior core structure. Just heat from the alleged burning fuel caused
the trusses to expand falling off their supports resulting in the 'collapse'
of the North Tower. Many have seen warehouses with their steel trusses supporting
the roof. These trusses may or may not be attached to their supporting walls.
HOWEVER, the North Tower is a 110 story skyscraper not a warehouse!
THIS PHOTO shows such a warehouse OPEN WEB JOIST or
TRUSS (The angular bars from the lower beam helps to support
and stiffen the upper roof beam.):
FEMA claims the North Tower floor joist in the next diagram
is a open web joist or TRUSS. However, the red circled areas
show that the angular braces wrap around the upper beam ,THUS
they serve no supporting or stiffening function for the top beam:
WHILE YOU ARE INSPECING THESE DIAGRAMS notice FEMA
is claiming that TWO 5/8 inch bolts ONLY attach
the beam at its ends.
Just to let the cat out of the bag: THIS IS NOT A TRUSS. Steel
beams only provide the primary support for the WTC floors. This diagrams explains
the purpose of the angular braces. They allow the upper beam to support the
lower rail that in turn supports the ceiling and all of its contents:
FROM: www.icc-es.org/reports/pdf_files/UBC/4071.pdf
This photo of a WTC office shows how close the ceiling approaches the windows.
Perhaps the South Tower Boeing 737 went though such an office space. In their
final report FEMA ignores the napalm bombs that went though the South Tower
along with the CFM56 engine from a Boeing 737 NOT a 767 the
Fed Govt. claims. See the RENSE article, The Rest Of The 9/11
Street Engine Story
http://www.rense.com/general64/wth.htm
This final piece of the puzzle shows the section of the floor assembly in place
with the lower rail of the assembly almost inline with the top of the windows.
The assembly is heavily bolted and welded to the exterior wall brackets.
This photo shows the floor assemblies in position. The assemblies of one floor
are covered with 4-5 inches of concrete to increase the strength of the floor.
FEMA claims 'lightweight' concrete was used and thus it was weak. Since the
concrete was a vital part of strengthening the floor that would be nonsense.
FEMA spun a fairy tale that the WTC Towers were a one of a kind construction
with inherent design flaws. However the MIT study had a different slant:
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/sixty-state-street/construction.htm
The design concept of tubular framing (the so-called tube within a tube architecture)
has been employed in the construction of many of the world's tallest buildings.
These include the John Hancock Center (1105 ft), the Standard Oil of Indiana
Building (1125 ft), the World Trade Center Towers (1350 ft), and the Sears Tower
(1450 ft). In fact, most modern skyscrapers use this design, a design which
uses a specially reinforced perimeter wall to resist all lateral loading and
some of the gravity loading, and a heavily reinforced central core to resist
the bulk of the gravity loading. The lateral loading (horizontal force) on the
building, is mainly due to the wind while the gravity loading (downward force)
is due to the weight of the building (i.e., due to gravity).
In the tube within a tube architecture, it is of vital importance that the horizontal
forces on one wall be transfered to the other walls, so that the entire structure
will bend to the minimum extent possible. It is also of vital importance that
these horizontal forces be transfered to the central core so that the entire
structure bends uniformly as one unit.
This is achieved by the use of a composite flooring system, which is designed
to act (in essence) as one super-large beam. The idea is to connect the steel
joists supporting the concrete slab, to the slab.
The combined steel joist-concrete slab, has sufficient strength to transfer
the lateral loading to the core and the other walls, so that the building bends
as little as possible, but when it does bend, it bends as a unit.
The Sixty State Street Building (Bosten) has solid steel beams spanning the
gap (of up to 40 feet) between the central core and perimeter wall (these are
the beams at the back and on the left in the photo):
MORE FROM THE MIT STUDY
Strangely, the authors of the FEMA Report "forget" to mention the
24 x 18 inch metal plates that were covered with shear studs and also set in
the concrete slab. THESE PLATES (together with the 6 foot long
diagonal bars and the welded and bolted truss connections) PROVIDED
A STRONG CONNECTION BETWEEN THE FLOOR SLAB AND THE PERIMETER WALL.
The plates are the dark rectangular objects along the perimeter wall in this
photo:
TO TOPPLE THE TOWER cutter charges would be placed: 1) on
the exterior columns, 2) at the intersection of the floor assembly to the wall,
and 3) on the inner core support columns and cross beams. Video analysis indicates
that one floor was taken out simultaneously with the whole core structure being
blasted to pieces.This photo shows the unconcreted floor assembly abutting the
exterior wall:
THE RED SQUARES in this diagram indicate the support columns
of the inner core. Notice the easy access to the support columns from the elevators,
stairways, storerooms, etc. TO TOPPLE SUCH A MASSIVE CORE cutter
charges would be placed on all columns and all cross beams at each floor level
all the way to Ground Zero.
SINCE Controlled Demolition, Inc. claims 70% of all 'removals'
here are some links to follow:
FROM: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2580
Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition, Inc
Loizeaux said, "If I were to bring the towers down, I would put explosives
in the basement to get the weight of the building to help collapse the structure."
Live link as of Oct. 10, 2004
www.cdi-uk.com Now why would this link be dead? Go to:
http://web.archive.org/web/20041010055436/http:/
/www.cdi-uk.com/index.html
Walter Burien has more incredible news at http://cafr1.com/
The Al Gore letter a must-read:
http://cafr1.com/Letter%20to%20Al%20Gore.html
Greg Syzmanski has an avalanche of 9/11 True Stories:
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/arcticbeacon.html
Make sure you keep up with the frequent updates of Citizen Spook
who has a hutch that the Plame network was on to 9/11 and HAD TO BE
OUTED:
http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/
Of course Karl Schwarz always has new 9/11 Aces up his sleeve:
www.karlschwarz.com
www.karlschwarz2008.com
DON'T MISS:
The Rest Of The 911 Flight 93 Story
http://www.rense.com/general67/rest911.htm
South Tower Exit Wounds Tell 9/11 Tale
http://www.rense.com/general67/911uu.htm
Dirty Little 9/11 Secrets Exposed
http://www.rense.com/general66/dirt.htm
Bush Responds To 911 Fireworks
http://www.rense.com/general66/ressp.htm
Hollywood-like Fake Smoke Made 9/11
http://www.rense.com/general65/911mir.htm
WTC 7 Smoke & Mirrors On 9/11
http://www.rense.com/general65/911m.htm
CBC 9/11 Video Secrets Revealed
http://www.rense.com/general65/911b.htm
911 CNN Reports Boeing 737s Struck WTC
http://www.rense.com/general65/911h.htm
Sneak Preview - 911 Pentagon Tapes
http://www.rense.com/general64/911et.htm
The Rest Of The 9/11 Street Engine Story
http://www.rense.com/general64/wth.htm
NYC Photos, Flight 93 Witnesses Identify 9/11 White Jet
http://www.rense.com/general64/white.htm
On 9/11 An Ill Wind Blew to Booker School
http://www.rense.com/general63/wte.htm
WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767
http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm
Second 911 Remote Control Antenna Verified
http://www.rense.com/general63/secnd.htm
Avionics Expert-A 911 Remote Control Lesson for PM
http://www.rense.com/general63/remo.htm
WTC Cutter Charges Clearly Visible
http://www.rense.com/general63/cutt.htm
Real 911 Science For PM - The ST Airliner Photo
http://www.rense.com/general63/st.htm
PM Claims Landing Gear Made Pentagon 12 Foot Hole
http://www.rense.com/general63/pmm.htm
PM Missed NASA 911-type Airliner Crash 20 Years Ago
http://www.rense.com/general63/pm.htm
Is Popular Mechanics Hiding 911 NYC Engine In Street Photo?
http://www.rense.com/general63/hiding.htm
Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified?
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
Missing Pentagon Unobstructed Citgo Videos
http://www.rense.com/general63/unob.htm