Untitled Document
No doubt the big-wig editors at the Washington Post and the New York Times pull
down good salaries. However, when it comes to investigating stories they are no
better or apparently qualified than first year journalism majors at a third-rate
community college. But even a first year journalism major—armed with a computer,
internet connection, and a browser pointed at Google—would quickly ascertain
that the Ayman al-Zawahiri mentioned today in the corporate media is not the same
Ayman al-Zawahiri who hung out with Osama bin Laden, that is before Osama died
a premature death and al-Zawahiri found himself locked in an Iranian prison. Equipped
with the correct search criteria, it would take all of five or ten minutes to
learn the truth about al-Zawahiri: on October 6, 2002, a fake al-Zawahiri delivered
his first message to al-Jazeera and followed this up with a second message on
May 21, 2003.
“The authenticity of the latest message purported to be of Ayman al-Zawahiri,”
B. Raman, a former Indian
government official and director the Institute for Topical Studies, wrote on
May 22, 2003, “is yet to be established. According to counter-terrorism
experts familiar with the voice and accent of al-Zawahiri, while the language
and accent in the tape resemble those of al-Zawahiri, the voice seems to be
of a person younger than al-Zawahiri, who is 51 years old.” As Raman notes,
“one generally depends on the voice analysis experts of the US intelligence
community” to establish the veracity of such recordings, although it “is
not certain how accurate are their analysis and conclusions” (or for that
matter how deliberately skewed for the sake of psychological warfare).
For instance, in regard to establishing the authenticity of an earlier (November,
2002) Osama bin Laden communiqué, “a private Swiss expert had expressed
his reservations about the conclusions of the US experts.” In fact, the
Swiss expert, Herve Bourlard of the Lausanne-based Dalle Molle Institute for
Perceptual Artificial Intelligence, assigned a team of experts to review the
recording, according to the BBC.
It was not Osama bin Laden on the tape, but probably an “imposter,”
concluded Samy Bengio, a voice recognition expert. Bourlard and his colleagues
“said it was 95% certain the tape does not feature the voice of the al-Qaeda
leader.”
Apparently, in the case of the latest al-Zawahiri tape, the corporate media
and the above mentioned handsomely remunerated editors and publishers (in essence
neocon and neolib propaganda disseminators) are not waiting for the CIA to certify
the latest tape—it is a foregone conclusion the voice is al-Zawahiri’s.
“Al-Zawahri issued the fresh threats with a Kalashnikov rifle propped
against a woven cloth background that moved with the wind and showed the sunlight,
suggesting the scene was filmed outdoors. He wore a white robe and black turban
and emphatically wagged his finger while speaking,” writes USA
Today. “The videotape of al-Qaeda deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri broadcast
on Thursday is the latest in a series of recent messages sent by the terrorism
network’s top leaders that analysts believe may be part of a campaign
to reassert themselves, even as they remain isolated by US and Pakistani forces,”
explains the Financial Times. “The video is another Al
Qaeda message apparently intended to turn Western democracies against their
leaders by explaining acts of terrorism as rational decisions from a group with
specific political goals,” reports the Christian
Science Monitor.
Of course, this is all nonsense—a fantastic fiction contrived by an alliance
of Anglo-American intelligence agencies (or factions therein) studiously working
to keep the al-Qaeda myth alive as they put forward their plan to eviscerate
Islamic culture and societies while also attacking civil liberties in the United
States and the United Kingdom.
Finally, there is a glaring flaw in the al-Zawahiri myth: in the May 21, 2003
message, al-Zawahiri mentions attacking Norway for its support of the invasion
and occupation of Iraq. “Some observers have interpreted the reference
to Norway in the message as possibly a mistake and said that he was probably
having Denmark in mind,” notes Raman, writing for the South Asia Analysis
Group. “Al-Zawahiri is reputed to be an intelligent and well-informed
person. It is difficult to believe that he would have mistaken Norway for Denmark.
This indicates the possibility that the message might have been recorded by
someone else, not well-informed and hence not able to distinguish between Norway
and Denmark, in the name of al-Zawahiri in order to mobilize the remnants of
Al Qaeda and the IIF [Bin Laden’s International Islamic Front] for action
in retaliation for the occupation of Iraq.” Or maybe the CIA does sloppy
work.
It is, as they say, human to err, and maybe al-Zawahiri simply made an honest
mistake, mixing up Norway and Denmark—except for one thing: in 1991, on
the run after his participation in terrorist attacks in Luxor, Egypt, al-Zawahiri
was “offered asylum in Denmark,” according to Giles
Foden, writing for the Guardian on September 24, 2001. Although it was never
officially confirmed al-Zawahiri lived in Denmark, a 1995 attempted assassination
of Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak “had been planned by exiled Egyptian
fundamentalists based in Denmark, including the Vanguards of Conquest [or Tala’i’
al Fath, an Islamic group active since the late 1970s] and al-Zawahiri,”
according to the Guardian.
In other words, either al-Zawahiri, using a voice not his own and suffering
from the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease, made a terrible blunder
about a country where he once lived, or the CIA (or whatever intelligence outfit
puts together these audio and video tapes) didn’t bother to research al-Zawahiri
before releasing the tape to al-Jazeera, a media outlet that basically serves
as a useful idiot for flawed propaganda (and it really says something when even
al-Jazeera does not detect these obvious mistakes).
Of course, considering the gullibility of the average American—so eager
to buy whatever bogus nonsense his government pedals via the corporate media—it
does not really matter if these tapes are amateurish and factually incorrect.
Slavish citizens buy these shoddily crafted lies hook, line, and sinker and
will, unfortunately, ultimately suffer the consequences, that is to say have
to put up with fake terrorism for a generation or two until their freedom is
but a distant memory in the past.