Untitled Document
The more I'm reading about Judy Miller and her actions leading up to and during
the early days of the war, and then through the unfolding Plame-Rove-Libby-Gonzalez-Card
scandal, the more I’m struck by the special access and relationships she
enjoyed with many of the key players in the Iraq debacle (which, at the end
of the day, is really what
Plamegate is all about).
For starters, of course, we have her still unfolding
involvement in the Plame leak. Earlier this month, Howard
Kurtz reported that Miller and Libby spoke a few days before Novak outed
Plame -- and I’m hearing that the Libby/Miller conversation occurred over
breakfast in Washington. Did Valerie Plame come up -- and, if so, who brought
her up? There is no question that Miller was angry at Joe Wilson… and
continues to be. A social acquaintance of Miller told me that, once, when she
spoke of Wilson, it was with “a passionate and heated disgust that went
beyond the political and included an irrelevant bit of deeply personal innuendo
about him, her mouth twisting in hatred.”
Miller’s special relationships go much further than Scooter Libby, Richard
Perle and the rest of the neocon establishment. Take her involvement as an embedded
reporter during the war with the Pentagon’s Mobile Exploitation Team (MET)
Alpha -- the unit charged with hunting down Saddam’s WMD. As extensively
reported by both Kurtz
and New York Magazine’s Franklin
Foer, Miller’s time with the unit was highly unusual.
First, there was the fact that she landed the plumb assignment in the first
place. It would give her first dibs on the biggest story of the war… the
hoped-for reveal of Saddam’s much-touted WMD (with much of the touting
done by Miller herself and her special sources). Was this the reward for her
pro-administration prewar reporting?
Foer cites military and New York Times sources as saying that Miller’s
assignment was so sensitive that Don Rumsfeld himself signed off on it. Once
embedded, Miller acted as much more than a reporter. Kurtz quotes one military
officer as saying that the MET Alpha unit became a “Judith Miller team.”
Another officer said that Miller “came in with a plan. She was leading
them… She ended up almost hijacking the mission.” A third officer,
a senior staffer of the 75th Exploitation Task Force, of which MET Alpha was
a part, put it this way: “It’s impossible to exaggerate the impact
she had on the mission of this unit, and not for the better.”
What did Miller do to create such an impression? According to Kurtz, she wasn’t
afraid to throw her weight around, threatening to write critical stories and
complain to her friends in very high places if things didn’t go her way.
“Judith,” said an Army officer, “was always issuing threats
of either going to the New York Times or to the secretary of defense. There
was nothing veiled about that threat.”
In one specific instance, she used her friendship with Major General David
Petraeus to force a lower ranking officer to reverse an order she was unhappy
about. (Can we stop for a moment and take the full measure of how unbelievable
this whole thing is?)
Miller also had a special, ten-year relationship with Ahmed Chalabi, which
led to the MET Alpha unit, which had no special training in interrogation or
intelligence, being given custody of Saddam Hussein’s son-in-law, Sultan.
Miller was even allowed to sit in on the initial questioning of Sultan -- a
turn of events that didn’t go down well with some Pentagon officials.
Miller apparently ended up developing an especially close relationship with
Chief Warrant Officer Richard Gonzalez, the leader of the MET Alpha unit. Along
with puffing him up in some of her dispatches -- once describing his “meeting
tonight with Mr. Chalabi to discuss nonproliferation issues” -- Miller
took the unusual step of taking part in the ceremony where Gonzalez was promoted,
actually pinning his new rank to his uniform (has the bizarreness of all this
hit you yet?).
Later, when Miller’s reporting came under serious fire, Gonzalez was
only too happy to return the favor, writing an impassioned response to the Times’
Iraq reporting mea culpa. “We have been deeply disturbed,” Gonzalez
wrote in a
letter to the Times that was co-signed by a pair of his colleagues,
“by the mischaracterizations of the operation and of [Miller’s]
reporting… We were particularly disturbed by the recent New York Times
editor’s note apologizing for having been ‘taken in’
by WMD ‘misinformation’ and citing one article she wrote while embedded
with our unit… We strongly disagree with that assertion and remain firmly
supportive of the accuracy of her accounts of the events she described, as well
as other articles she wrote while embedded with our unit.” Wow. I’m
kinda surprised he didn’t sign it “JM + MET Alpha, N.A.F (Now and
Forever)”.
But Gonzalez and his pals seem to be the only ones standing behind the accuracy
of Miller’s reporting. Even the administration is no longer barking up
that tree, with top weapons hunter Charles Duelfer closing
his investigation this spring saying that the search for WMD “has
been exhausted” without finding any -- while at the same time dismissing
the Miller-touted
claim that WMD had been shipped to Syria just before the U.S. invaded.
So the WMD investigation has ended. But the investigation into Judy Miller’s
role -- both in the WMD fiasco and the Plame scandal -- is just beginning.