Untitled Document
The United States long ago ceased to be anything like a living, thriving republic.
But it retained the legal form of a republic, and that counted for something:
As long as the legal form still existed, even as a gutted shell, there was hope
it might be filled again one day with substance.
But now the very legal structures of the Republic are being dismantled. The
principle of arbitrary rule by an autocratic leader is being openly established,
through a series of unchallenged executive orders, perverse Justice Department
rulings and court decisions by sycophantic judges who defer to power -- not
law -- in their determinations. What we are witnessing is the creation of a
"commander-in-chief state," where the form and pressure of law no
longer apply to the president and his designated agents. The rights of individuals
are no longer inalienable, nor are their persons inviolable; all depends on
the good will of the Commander, the military autocrat.
President George W. Bush has granted himself the power to declare anyone on earth
-- including any U.S. citizen -- an "enemy combatant," for any reason
he sees fit. He can render them up for torture, he can imprison them for life,
he can even have them killed, all without charges, with no burden of proof, no
standards of evidence, no legislative oversight, no appeal, no judicial process
whatsoever except those that he himself deigns to construct, with whatever limitations
he cares to impose. Nor can he ever be prosecuted for any order he issues, however
criminal; in the new American system laid out by Bush's legal minions, the Commander
is sacrosanct, beyond the reach of any law or constitution.
This is not hyperbole. It is simply the reality of the United States today.
The principle of unrestricted presidential power is now being codified into
law and incorporated into the institutional structures of the state, as the
web log Deep Blade Journal reports in a compendium of recent outrages against
liberty.
For example, last Friday, a panel of federal judges -- including John Roberts,
nominated for the Supreme Court this week -- upheld Bush's claim to dispose
of "enemy combatants" any way he pleases, The Washington Post reports.
In a chilling decision, the judges ruled that the Commander's arbitrarily designated
"enemies" are nonpersons: Neither the Geneva Conventions nor American
military and domestic law apply to such garbage. Bush is now free to subject
anyone he likes to his self-concocted "military tribunal" system,
a brutal sham that retired top U.S. military officials have denounced as a "kangaroo
court" that tyrants around the world will cite in order to hide their oppression
under U.S. precedent.
The kowtowing court ruling ignores the fact that the Geneva Conventions --
which lay down strict guidelines for the handling of any person detained by
military forces, regardless of the captive's status -- have been incorporated
into the U.S. legal code, Deep Blade points out. They cannot be abrogated by
presidential fiat. And anyone who commits a "grave breach" of the
Conventions by facilitating the killing, torture or inhuman treatment of detainees
(e.g., stripping them of all legal status and subjecting them to rigged tribunals)
is subject to the death penalty under U.S. law.
This is why the Bush Faction labored so mightily to advance the absurd fiction
that the Geneva Conventions are somehow voluntary -- while simultaneously promulgating
the sinister Fuhrerprinzip of unlimited presidential authority. The fiction
was a temporary sop to the crumbling legal form of the Republic, a cynical perversion
of existing law to keep justice at bay until the Fuhrerprinzip could be firmly
established as the new foundation of the state.
It doesn't matter anymore if the president's orders to suspend the Conventions,
construct a worldwide gulag, torture captives, spy on Americans, fabricate intelligence
and wage aggressive war are illegal under the "quaint" strictures of
the old dispensation; the courts, packed with Bushist cadres, are now affirming
the new order, the "critical authority" of the Commander, beyond law
and morality, on the higher plane of what Bush calls "the path of action."
This phrase -- with its remarkable Mussolinian echoes -- was incorporated into
the official "National Security Strategy of the United States," promulgated
by Bush in September 2002. That document in turn was drawn largely from a manifesto
issued in September 2000 by a Bush Faction group whose members included Dick
Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Jeb Bush. Their detailed plan envisioned
the transformation of America into a militarized state: planting "military
footprints" throughout Central Asia and the Middle East, invading Iraq,
expanding the nuclear arsenal, massively increasing the defense budget -- and
predicating all these "revolutionary" changes on the hopes for "a
new Pearl Harbor" that would "catalyze" the lazy American public
into supporting their militarist agenda.
This agenda is designed, the group said, to establish "full spectrum dominance"
over geopolitical affairs, assuring control of world energy resources and precluding
the rise of "any potential global rival" that might threaten the unchecked
wealth and privilege of the U.S. elite. The rule of law could only be a hindrance
to such a scheme, hence its replacement by the Fuhrerprinzip and the "path
of action."
There has been virtually no institutional resistance to this open coup d'etat.
It's now clear that the American Establishment -- and a significant portion
of the American people -- have given up on the democratic experiment. They no
longer wish to govern themselves; they want to be ruled by "strong leaders"
who will "do whatever it takes" to protect them from harm and keep
them in clover. They have sold their golden birthright of American liberty for
a mess of coward's pottage.