Untitled Document
"Q: What do you get when you balance the truth with a lie? A:
You get a partial truth or a partial lie. Is that what good journalism is about?"
How can the Corporation for Public Broadcasting even pretend to be concerned
about "fair and balanced" journalism, when two of the principal executives
of the Corporation are high-level political operatives, hired on from the Republican
Party or the Bush Administration?
What does "fair and balanced" mean, when applied to journalism, anyway?
Does it mean balancing the truth with a lie? Q: What do you get when you balance
the truth with a lie? A: You get a partial truth or a partial lie. Is that what
good journalism is about?
Does "fair and balanced" journalism mean balancing between the right
and the far right of the political spectrum? That appears to be the concept
in place at the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. When the far right complains
about "liberal bias", they are actually complaining that moderates
of either party are heard and not pure, 100% extremist ultra right wing propaganda.
Let us not forget that "moderates" of both parties are located far
more to the right than in period of history. We have Nancy Pelosi with a 100%
voting record in support of the Iraq War, despite a home constituency that was
63% against the war in the last San Francisco election. Pelosi is considered
a "liberal" by Robert Novak and Karl Rove, but she is about as much
a liberal on issues of war and peace in today's political environment as Barry
Goldwater was four decades ago.
Fair and balanced? Fair to who? Fair to liars who do not want to be exposed?
Fair to the proponents of the Weapons of Mass Destruction argument? Fair to
the fabricators of the deceptions used by Colin Powell in his speech to the
United Nations?
What form of journalism would be fair and balanced for the cause of peace?
What form of journalism would be fair and balanced for the sake of Iraqi freedom?
What form of journalism would be fair and balanced for the sake of justice for
the Palestinians? What form of journalism would be fair and balanced for the
benefit of the American taxpayer and his future under a heavy burden of wealth
transfer to the wealthy elite?
Clearly, fair and balanced journalism, CPB-style, is only fair and balanced
if you are unfair and off-balance in favor of the military/corporate/government
complex. Ken Tomlinson is about as fair and balanced as Senator Joe McCarthy
was.
If you want to learn what "fair and balanced" journalism means, look
to a real practitioner, such as Bill Moyers. Bill Moyers is despised by the
right because of his fair and balanced approach.
Fair and balanced does not mean balancing truth with lies. It does not imply
that the truth is at the center between two extreme points on the political
spectrum. Fair and balanced journalism must not be a fulcrum on which to destroy
democracy by leveraging away farther and farther from the truth. The public
interest is not served by lies and deceit, and lust for power is often predicated
on lies and deceit. Fair and balanced journalism exposes lies and deceit and
enhances democracy; is an absolute prerequisite for democracy.