Untitled Document
Taking a Closer Look at the Stories Ignored by the Corporate Media
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact

NEWS
All News
9-11
Corporatism
Disaster in New Orleans
Economics
Environment
Globalization
Government / The Elite
Human Rights
International Affairs
Iraq War
London Bombing
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism
Miscellaneous

COMMENTARY
All Commentaries
9-11
CIA
Corporatism
Economics
Government / The Elite
Imperialism
Iraq War
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism

SEARCH/ARCHIVES
Advanced Search
View the Archives

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly

LONDON BOMBING -
-

Documents and explosives, a few simple questions

Posted in the database on Friday, July 15th, 2005 @ 15:40:28 MST (1899 views)
by Steve Watson    Infowars.com  

Untitled Document

Following the "revelation" that the so called London Bombers left personal documents at the scenes of the attacks, plus a car load of explosives at Luton Station, there are a few unanswered questions that need addressing.

1. Why would suicide bombers carry personal documents?

Were they under the impression they would be traveling elsewhere after they blew themselves up? Even if the bombers themselves were not thinking straight, would the so called outside "Mastermind" of the operation really allow his trained bombers to risk being identified, thus possibly revealing a trail back to him?

2. How is it that paper documents can survive bomb blasts that rip apart steel and people?

If the bombers were carrying documents then surely they would have been in very close proximity to the bombs themselves, if not in the bags with the bombs. If not then why would the bombers all leave their personal documents in safe places away from the carnage? Perhaps they were made out of the magic paper that can survive air wrecks, fires hot enough to melt steel and the pulverization of concrete skyscrapers as on 9/11.

3. Why were two of the men's papers found in two or three different locations? Why would you give away your personal documents to a fellow bomber if you knew you were both going to die?

4. If you were going to use four bombs in four locations, blowing yourself up in the process, why would you leave extra bombs in your hire car for the police to find?

5. The bombers have been described as four "nice lads", "normal kids who played basketball and kicked a ball around" , one was the son of a fish n chip shop owner, one was a primary teacher. Their immediate family of one of the bombers, the 22 year old sports science graduate, have been quoted as saying they "could not comprehend why he had become a mass murderer."

HOW DID THESE NICE YOUNG LADS GET THEIR HANDS ON MILITARY GRADE HIGH EXPLOSIVES AND IF THEIR HOUSES WERE FULL OF THEM, ENOUGH TO WARRANT THE EVACUATION OF 600 PEOPLE FROM THE AREA THEN WOULDN'T THEIR FAMILIES HAVE NOTICED?

Of course the police have now confirmed that there must be a grand mastermind behind the whole plot. No doubt that person will have fled and a never ending manhunt will ensue. In any case these five simple questions highlight the fact that the official line defies all logic.



Go to Original Article >>>

The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly




Untitled Document
Disclaimer
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact
Copyright 2005 Looking Glass News.