WASHINGTON, DC -- Last week's London explosions carry the characteristic features
of a state-sponsored, false flag, synthetic terror provocation by networks within
the British intelligence services MI-5, MI-6, the Home Office, and the Metropolitan
Police Special Branch who are favorable to a wider Anglo-American aggressive war
in the Middle East, featuring especially an early pre-emptive attack on Iran,
with a separate option on North Korea also included. With the London attacks,
the Anglo-American invisible government adds another horrendous crime to its own
dossier. But this time, their operations appear imperfect, especially in regard
to the lack (so far) of a credible patsy group which, by virtue of its ethnicity,
could direct popular anger against one of the invisible government's targets.
So far, the entire attribution of the London crimes depends on what amounts to
an anonymous posting in an obscure, hitherto unknown, secular Arabic-language
chatrooms in the state of Maryland, USA. But, based on this wretched shred of
pseudo-evidence, British Prime Minister Tony Blair who has surely heard of a group
called the Irish Republican Army, which bombed London for more than a decade has
not hesitated to ascribe the murders to "Islam," and seems to be flirting
with total martial law under the Civil Contingencies Act. We are reminded once
again of how he earned his nickname of Tony Bliar.
SCOTLAND YARD KNEW IN ADVANCE
That the British Government knew in advance that blasts would occur is not open
to rational doubt. Within hours of the explosions, Israeli Army Radio was reporting
that "Scotland Yard [London police headquarters] had intelligence warnings
of the attacks a short time before they occurred." This report, repeated
by IsraelNN.com, added that "the Israeli Embassy in London was notified in
advance, resulting in Foreign Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel
room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion,
a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address an economic summit."
This report is attributed to "unconfirmed reliable sources." At around
the same time, the Associated Press issued a wire asserting that "British
police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday's explosions
that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city,"
according to "a senior Israeli official." This wire specifies that "just
before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy
to say that they had received warnings of possible attacks."
According to eyewitness reports from London, BBC claimed between 8:45 and some
minutes after 10 AM that the incidents in the Underground were the result of an
electrical power surge, or alternatively of a collision. Foreign bigwigs, presumably
not just Netanyahu, were warned, while London working people continued to stream
into the subway. These reports have been denied, repudiated, sanitized, and expunged
from news media websites by the modern Orwellian Thought Police, but they have
been archived by analysts who learned on 9/11 and other occasions that key evidence
in state-sponsored terror crimes tends to filter out during the first minutes
and hours, during the critical interval when the controlled media are assimilating
the cover story peddled by complicit moles within the ministries. These reports
are not at all damaging to Israel, but are devastating for British domestic security
organs. An alternative version peddled by Stratfor.com, namely that the Israelis
warned Scotland Yard, is most probably spurious but still leaves the British authorities
on the hook. Which Scotland Yard official made the calls? Identify that official,
and you have bagged a real live rogue network mole.
Another more general element of foreknowledge can be seen in the fact reported
by Isikoff and Hosenball of Newsweek that, since about November 2004, the US FBI,
but not other US agencies, has been refusing to use the London Underground.
Operations like these are generally conduited through the government bureaucracies
under the cover of a drill or exercise which closely resembles the terror operation
itself. So it was with Amalgam Virgo and the multiple exercises held on 9/11,
as I show in my 9/11 Synthetic Terror Made in USA (Joshua Tree CA: Progressive
Press, 2005). So it was with the Hinckley attempt to assassinate Ronald Reagan,
when a presidential succession exercise was scheduled for the next day, as I showed
in my George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography (1992; reprint by Progressive Press,
2004). An uncannily similar maneuver allows the necessary work to be done on official
computers and on company time, while warding off the inquisitive glances and questions
of curious co-workers at adjoining computer consoles.
THE COVER STORY TERROR DRILL
Such a parallel drill was not lacking in the London case. On the evening of July
7, BBC Five, a news and sports radio program, carried an interview with a certain
former Scotland Yard official named Peter Power who related that his firm, Visor
Consulting, had been doing an anti-terror-bombing drill in precisely the Underground
stations and at the precise times when the real explosions went off. Peter Power
and Visor had been subcontractors for the drill; Power declined to name the prime
contractors. Small wonder that Blair, in his first official report to the Commons
on July 11, went out of his way to rule out a board of inquiry to probe these
Tony Blair may be eyeing the advantages of emergency rule for a discredited lame
duck like himself, but the British people may have a different view. The alternative
is clear: on the one hand is the American response after 9/11, marked by submissive
and credulous gullibility in regard to the fantastic official story of what had
happened. On the other hand is the militant and intelligent Spanish response after
March 11, 2004, marked by powerful mass mobilization and righteous anger against
politicians who sought to manipulate the people and sell a distorted account of
events. Which way will the British people go? Straws in the wind suggest that
the British response may be closer to the Spanish, although it may develop more
slowly because of the lack of mass organization and related factors. If this is
the case, Tony Blair, Jack Straw, and the rest of the malodorous "New Labor"
crypto-Thatcherites will be out the window.
My thesis is that the London explosions represent a form of communication on the
past of the transatlantic Anglo-American financier faction with Bush, Blair, and
the heads of state and government assembled at Gleneagles, Scotland for the G-8
meeting on the day of the blast. The London deaths were designed to deliver an
ultimatum in favor of early war with Iran. Here a word of clarification may be
necessary. The demonization of Bush by his many enemies, while understandable,
risks blurring the basic realities of power in the US and UK. Since the Bay of
Pigs and the Kennedy assassination (to go back no further than that), we have
been aware of a secret team. During the Iran-contra era, the same phenomenon was
referred to as an invisible, secret or parallel government. This is still the
matrix of most large-scale terrorism. The questions arises for some: do Bush and
Cheney tell the invisible government what to do, or does the invisible government
treat the visible office holders as puppets and expendable assets? To ask the
question is to answer it: Bush, Cheney & Co. are the expendable puppets. The
explanation of terror is not Bush MIHOP, as some seem to argue, but rather invisible
government MIHOP, an altogether more dire proposition.
How then does the invisible faction communicate with the public mouthpieces? Given
the violence of the power relations involved, we can be sure that it is not a
matter of sending out engraved invitations announcing that the honor of Bush's
presence is requested at the launching of an attack on Iran. Rather, the invisible
and violent rogue network communicates with Bush, Blair, and others by means coherent
with their aggressive nature as they did on 9/11. Bush, of course, is a weak and
passive tenant of the White House whose instinct is to do virtually nothing beyond
the day-to-day routine.
We therefore need to note that the London blasts come after two months of vigorous
and impatient prodding of Bush by the invisible government. On May 11, a small
plane almost reached the White House before it was turned away, while the Congress,
the Supreme Court, and the White House (but not the Pentagon, the Treasury, etc.)
were evacuated amid scenes of panic. The White House went to red alert, but Bush
was not informed until it was all over, and was riding his bicycle in the woods
near Greenbelt, Maryland. Flares were dropped over the Brookland district and
Takoma Park, MD. The resemblance of all this to a classic coup scenario was evident.
On May 18, a live hand grenade, which turned out to be a dud, landed near Bush
as he spoke at a rally in Tbilisi, Georgia.
On June 29, the approach of another small plane led to an evacuation of the Congress
and the Capitol, again with scenes of panic. On the afternoon of July 2, no fewer
than three small planes came close to Bush's Camp David retreat in the Catoctin
Mountains of Maryland; this story was suspiciously relegated to the local news
page of the Washington Post. The details of these incidents are of little interest;
what counts is the objective reality of a pattern. These incidents also provide
background for Bush's unbalanced behavior on July 5 at Gleneagles, when he crashed
into a policeman while riding on his bicycle. Then came the London blasts on July
What is it that the invisible government wants Bush and Blair to do? Scott Ritter
announced last January that Bush had issued an order to prepare an attack on Iran
for the month of June. According to a well-informed retired CIA analyst I spoke
with on July 3, this order actually told US commanders to be ready to attack Iran
by the end of June. This project of war with Iran is coherent with most of what
we know about the intentions of the US-UK rogue faction, and thus provides the
immediate background for the London explosions. The Bush administration and the
Blair cabinet have failed to deliver decisive military action, and the invisible
government is exceedingly impatient.
One way to increase the pressure on Iran would be to implicate a group of Iranian
fanatic patsies in the London bombings. This would not be difficult; in fact,
as I show in 9/11 Synthetic Terror, the British capital, referred to during the
1990s as Londonistan, is home to the largest concentration of Arab and Islamic
patsy groups in the entire world in such infamous locations as Finsbury mosque
and Brixton mosque; these groups are known to have enjoyed de facto recruiting
privileges in Her Majesty's Prisons. But perhaps an Iranian patsy group would
be too obvious at this time. More likely may be the sinking of a US warship in
the Gulf by a third country, duly attributed to Iran.
In a recent speech, Dr. Ephraim Asculai of Tel Aviv University made two main points:
first, that there is no military solution to the Iranian nuclear issue, and second,
that there is no such thing as a point of no return in nuclear weapons development.
Dr. Asculai showed that South Africa, Sweden, and other nations had turned away
from deploying A-bombs well after having acquired the ability to produce them.
Dr. Asculai is evidently arguing against widespread tendencies in the US-UK-Israeli
strategic community who are whipping up hysteria around the notion that Iran is
now indeed approaching exactly such a point of no return.
For her part, Miss Rice of the State Department has now declared that it will
no longer be sufficient for Iran to turn away from nuclear weapons production;
the entire Iranian program for nuclear energy production will also have to be
dismantled, in her view. Such maximalism makes a negotiated solution impossible
as long as the current Washington group holds power.
SCO: US GET OUT OF CENTRAL ASIA
The US, UK and Israel have been on the brink of war with Iran for at least a year,
and the rogue network is generally aware that time is not on its side. There is
also an important new development which threatens the ability of the Anglo-Americans
to wage war. On July 5, the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO),
which brings together China, Russia, Uzbekistan, Krygyzia, Kazakhstan, and Tajikistan
plus new members India, Pakistan, and Iran, issued a call for the United States
to vacate the bases seized in the autumn of 2001 under the cover of the 9/11 emergency
and the looming invasion of Afghanistan. The parties to this call represent about
half of the world's population. This demand was immediately rejected by the State
Department, but veteran Russian Eurasian expert Yevgeny Primakov crowed that for
the first time a formula had been agreed to by which the US would be ejected from
this region. The US presence goes back to the Bush-Putin emergency hotwire talks
of September 11, 2001, when Putin, seeing that the madmen had seized control in
Washington, dropped Russian objections to a US intrusion into the former Soviet
republics of central Asia. The US-UK can attack Iran from Iraq in the west, from
Afghanistan in the east, and from Qatar in the south, but without the Uzbek and
Kyrgyz bases, the Anglo-American ability to attack from the north as well will
be severely limited. The SCO states are also concerned about US-backed "color
revolutions" on the recent Georgian and Ukrainian models, traditionally known
as CIA "people power" revolutions, being used to destabilize their governments.
To make matters worse for Washington and London, Kazakhstan is a few months away
from opening an oil pipeline to China, which will diminish the US-UK ability to
use their Gulf presence to blackmail Beijing. Washington and London are also dismayed
by the pro-Iranian overtures in various fields being made by their Shiite puppets
And what of the report in the Washington Post of July 11, which claims that US
and UK planners are now contemplating a sharp reduction in the US forces in Iraq?
The most plausible explanation is that this is pure disinformation, similar to
news blips issued by both Hitler and Stalin in May and June of 1941. It should
also be noted that the British plan explicitly provides for most of the forces
now at Basra to go to Afghanistan, where they would be positioned for operations
against Iran, or into central Asia.
Generally, the invisible government appears dismayed by its loss of momentum and
the constant erosion of the political position of its asset, Bush. 110,000 US
factory workers lost their jobs in June, the worst total in a year and a half:
auto and textiles are collapsing. The housing bubble may also be nearing its end,
with the bankruptcy of Fannie Mae on the near-term agenda. World derivatives have
officially reached $300 trillion, with JP Morgan Chase holding the largest single
portfolio. The one virtuoso performance of July 7 was that of the Federal Reserve,
Bank of England, and European Central Bank, which flooded equity and capital markets
with liquidity through such vehicles as the Plunge Protection Team (PPT), turning
a big Wall Street loss into a small gain.
During the recent Reopen 9/11 tour of 8 European cities, Jimmy Walter repeatedly
forecast that the general predicament of the Bush regime and the US financier
faction would lead to another large-scale terror attack before the end of 2005;
this has now occurred, and there is no end in sight. The tide of US public opinion
has now definitively turned against the Iraq war and to some degree against Bush,
as all major polls demonstrate. Notable is the 42% affirmative response to the
Zogby International question as to whether, if it could be proved that Bush lied
to launch the Iraq war, he should be impeached. Larry Franklin of the Wolfowitz-Feith
neocon apparatus has been indicted for divulging US secrets, and the American-Israeli
Public Affairs Council has been raided twice; further indictments are expected.
Karl Rove has now been revealed as the source of the Valerie Plame leak, making
Rove and perhaps other White House officials fair game for federal indictment.
The Niger yellowcake forgeries and the Chalabi state secrets cases are still pending
to say nothing of two stolen elections and the 9/11 Septembergate itself. All
these factors incline the rogue network to seek an improvement in their situation
through a flight forward to a wider war in Iran. Those who stand to lose most
by such an Iranian adventure must now mobilize to make Mr. Bush's second term
as eventful as Nixon's second term turned out to be in 1974.