Untitled Document
Some war critics say trusting the military to report an accurate GI death toll
in Iraqi is like asking a mafia boss how many people he "whacked’ this
year. One number, however, not in dispute is that President Bush hasn’t
attended a single military funeral, something even the most cold hearted street
bosses do out of respect for the families.
Of course no one really knows how many gangster "hits" end up in
New York’s East River, but there is growing speculation that Pentagon
brass are taking a page out The Godfather Trilogy, using it as a quick refresher
course on how to hide the bodies.
The Pentagon denies any foul play or under reporting, a military spokesman
last week placing the GI death toll in Iraq at 1,725 and 193 in Afghanistan,
a figure changing daily due to increased violence.
In fact, rarely a day goes by when at least one soldier isn’t killed.
But the question remains exactly how many?
Pentagon spokesman Maj. Michael Shavers said "every single death"
is reported in the official figure if it is deemed to occur "in the theatre"
and of a "hostile" nature. He added 366 deaths have not been added
to the official list since they were considered accidental or non-hostile.
"If a soldier dies in the theatre of action and it is deemed hostile,
then his or her death is reported," said Maj. Shavers, adding accidental
and non –hostile deaths are not counted only if totally unrelated to combat.
"It should be noted that if an individual dies as a result of an injury
in the theatre deemed hostile within 120 days after the injury occurred, the
death is counted in the official totals no matter where he dies.
"This means if he dies on the transport airplane or in the hospital afterwards,
he or she is counted in the official death toll."
But Brian Harring, an independent researcher and author preparing a book on
the subject, places the military’s figures and its method of tabulating
deaths in serious question.
For months, Harring has been putting together a painstaking and exhaustive
research project, complete with secrete Department of Defense (DOD) documents,
claiming the Pentagon has been "drastically under reporting deaths, injuries
and desertions" in order to dispel war criticism.
"I have put together a comprehensive analysis of the Iraqi War from the
planning stages before the war and then have broken down the actions during
the war month by month. I show a chronology supported with documents…the
actual death tolls are far in excess of the official ones posted by the DOD,"
said Harring.
Harring’s accusations starting circulating this week in an update of
his work at tbrnews.org, claiming he has official DOD internal casualty lists
not released which reveal the true number of Iraqi deaths, both military and
civilian, as well as accurate casualty and desertion numbers.
Taking his lawyer’s advice, considering the present political climate
and the passage of the Patriot Act, Harring decided it was safer not to publish
the list in the U.S., opting to first release the damaging DOD documents overseas.
"Be assured that the .pdf (DOD internal) document is real, exactly as
reported, but it is a huge 900-page file. As soon as it appears in the public
domain overseas beyond the reach of US law, we may then legally reproduce it
here in this country, and we will not hesitate to do so," said Harring
about the legal complications he is encountering.
"When it is published, it will have a devastating effect on the political
scene and will certainly reveal the total lack of credibility of anyone connected
with the Bush administration."
Although his research is incomplete, Harring claims figures compiled to date
reveal approximately 7,000 GI deaths, 100,000 Iraqi civilian deaths, 26,000
GI injuries and 5,500 desertions, all far in excess of official military reports
released to the public.
"We have received copies of manifests from the MATS that show far more
bodies shipped into Dover AFB than are reported official," said Harring.
"When our research is complete, and watertight, we will publish the results
along with the sources."
Harring is also soliciting public help for his project, asking families or
friends who have lost loved ones in Iraq to check out tbrnews.org, a site that
is also publishing the complete list of Iraqi dead as released by DOD.
" We have posted an official and alphabetized list of the official dead.
We have asked readers to advise us of any names they might be aware of that
are not on this list," added Harring.
"Since our first posting, we have received several such omitted names,
seven in the first day, and to date, June 20, 2005, 38 total, and are compiling
these, along with proofs of death from the DOD, which we will post when we collect
a significant number - 100 or more - which cannot be dismissed by the DOD as
an oversight."
However, it appears Harring’s basis for accusing the military of under
reporting, at least regarding GI deaths, is in direct conflict with the official
military categorization of a hostile versus non-hostile and accidental death.
Maj. Shavers said the military reports all deaths if they result from hostile
injuries in the theatre if the death occurs within 120 days no matter if they
die en route or in the hospital.
Harring contends otherwise, writing:
"There are many more deaths that have not appeared on the official lists
because the DOD has taken to the tricky tactics of loading dying and probable
fatalities onto aircraft and flying them out of Iraq to bases and hospitals
outside of that country.
"So, if a GI is dying or has every expectation of dying, he or she is
loaded on an aircraft and their subsequent deaths are not publicly reported
as "combat deaths." Of course the families or survivors are certainly
notified of the death but the public is not."