If you believe that George Bush won last nights election "fair and square"
then forget about reading this article. If you know however that tens of thousands
of people who lined up for up to four hours at a time in Ohio and Florida to have
their vote counted, were not standing there to endorse the aggression and suicidal
policies of the current administration then read on.
The unprecedented high turnout coupled with new registrations (that were overwhelmingly
in favor of John Kerry) suggest that there was foul play at the voting booths.
As a result, consumer investigator and activist Bev Harris (founder of Black
Box Voting) "is conducting the largest Freedom of Information action in
history. On election night, Black Box Voting blanketed the US with the first
in a series of public records requests, to obtain internal computer logs and
other documents from 3,000 individual counties and townships."
If the Bush people are so confident in their victory let them "put up
or shut up."
The fact of the matter is (as every reasonable person who hasn't been hoodwinked
by the pageantry of election night fraud realizes) that the election was stolen
again in full view of the American public. The Republican owned voting machines
prevailed over exit poll projections and the will of the American people.
If that's not the case, then let's investigate the computer logs. According
to Lynn Landis' article "Could the AP rig the Election": "The
Associated Press (AP) will be the sole source of raw vote totals for the major
news broadcasters on Election Night.. They refused to confirm or deny that the
AP will receive direct feed from voting machines and central vote tabulating
computers across the country. But, circumstantial evidence suggests that is
exactly what will happen.
And what can be downloaded can also be uploaded. Computer experts say that
signals can travel both to and from computerized voting machines through wireless
technology, modems, and even simple electricity." Landis just confirms
what is already known about "sketchy" electronic voting and how it
invites vote tampering. Her connection between election machinery, vote totals
and the AP, however, has not previously been made. She goes on to explain that,
"AP spokespeople would not give out information on who sits on their board,
however AP leadership appears quite conservative."
Landis continues: "Burl Osborne, chairman of the AP board of directors,
is also publisher emeritus of the conservative The Dallas Morning News, a newspaper
that endorsed George W. Bush in the last election. Kathleen Carroll, senior
vice president and executive editor of AP, was a reporter at The Dallas Morning
News before joining AP. Carroll is also on the Associated Press Managing Editors
(APME)'s 7-member executive committee. The APME "works in partnership with
AP to improve the wire service's performance," according to their website.
APME vice president, Deanna Sands, is managing editor of the ultra conservative
Omaha World Herald newspaper, whose parent company owns the largest voting machine
company in the nation, Election Systems and Software (ES&S)."
It's a cozy relationship considering that ES&S voting machines count 50%
of all the votes in the country. The second largest company, Diebold, is also
tied to the Republican Party and promised (in a comment by Wally Diebold that
got widespread attention on the internet) to "deliver the vote" in
Ohio to President Bush.
Both Wally and ES&S apparently succeeded admirably in their task of undermining
Many readers are probably wondering what happened to the "Help America
Vote Act" that was passed by Congress to avoid the problems of Florida
2000? As Landis reports in an earlier article: "What Congress really did
was to throw $2.65 billion at the states, so that they could lavish it on a
handful of private companies that are controlled by ultra-conservative Republicans,
foreigners and felons." (Diebold, ES&S and Sequoia were among the big
None of the facts related to the presidential election add up. Voter registration
went up from 105 million to 120 million. In Ohio alone it went up a whopping
17%. Whenever registration has surged like this in the past, it has always favored
the challenger and precipitated a change in government.
Not so, this time, and Republican pollsters are eager to convince us that the
reason for this is a renewed interest among the American public for "moral
values". Is that it or are the results simply an indication of massive
(but well calculated) voter fraud?
The exit polling was equally skewed, showing a clear victory for Kerry. Exit
polling has traditionally been a reliable way of determining the outcome of
elections. Not so in Bush-world, where vote totals are invariably higher for
Bush in the contentious areas that ultimately decide the election.
Give strategist Karl Rove his due; he knew what had to be done and did it.
The rest, of course, has been papered over by the pollsters, pimps and pundits
in American press corps.
Do we need to remind ourselves that representative government can only be established
by the power of the vote? It is the electoral process that confers legitimacy
on government. Without a popular mandate state power can only be vindicated
through force of arms.
Last night American democracy was skillfully subverted and replaced with a
mutant form of corporatism that operates independent of the will of the people.
It's impossible to know what the long term affects of this will be, but it is
a development that should greatly concern us all.