INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS - LOOKING GLASS NEWS | |
America cements ties with Indonesia as part of its plan for hegemony in Southeast Asia |
|
from khilafah.com
Entered into the database on Wednesday, June 08th, 2005 @ 20:57:46 MST |
|
On the 25th of May Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono met with George
W Bush in the White House for wide ranging talks between the two leaders. Their
discussions included topics such as US economic assistance to Indonesia, education
reform, economic co-operation, trade relations, the War on Terror, counter terrorism
measures and the regional situation in Southeast Asia. In a joint statement released by both leaders a number of pledges were made;
US companies were to be invited to partake in building Indonesia's infrastructure,
$10 million of G-8 project monies were to be used to tackle corruption and improve
the business climate, Indonesia was to receive tsunami relief aid, there would
be a resumption of Trade and Investment talks and details of joint defence and
security talks between the US and Indonesia militaries were announced. The following
day the US agreed a partial lifting of the arms embargo on sales of military
equipment to Indonesia. Both Presidents' Bush and Yudhoyono lavished praise
upon one another and each other's countries and reiterated the warm and cordial
relations that they wished for between America and Indonesia. Bush also cited
Indonesia's pivotal role in fostering relations between the Islamic world and
the West. He said, "Indonesia will play a large role and a significant
role in helping us understand that great religions should co-exist in a peaceful
way". The cementing of Indonesian and US ties follows a flurry of activity over the
past few years that has seen Indonesia and the Southeast Asian region in general
resonate more readily on America's radar of global influence. The levers used
by the USA have been many and cover a range of diplomatic, economic, military
and cultural factors. The Greatest Prize With regard to the economic aspects that flavour the US- Indonesian relationship,
this goes back some 50 years. US control in Indonesia started at the time of
the Sukarno administration in the 1950's and intensified with President Suharto
in 1965. Indonesia is a nation rich with resources; huge oil and gas reserves,
gold deposits, tin, copper, bauxite, tropical forests, nickel and other hydrocarbons
and minerals as well being strategically placed for vital sea and shipping lanes.
Presently, Indonesia's territory carries 30% of the world's sea borne trade,
is a vital transit route for the US naval fleet and half the world's oil passes
through the Malacca strait. Foreign companies and multinationals entered the country in the 1960's and
have solidified western involvement ever since. Richard Nixon said in 1967, Throughout the 1960's, on the pretext of rebuilding the nation, western companies
and banks virtually took over the whole of Indonesia's commercial and business
sector with different industries carved out to respective countries overseen
by huge IMF and World Bank loans. The major players involved from this time
until now remain largely the same; the Ford Foundation, US Agency for International
Development, US steel, The Freeport company, International Paper corporation,
General Motors and many more. A World Bank official noted during this time that: US influence in Indonesia through economic and business ties over the past
few decades has also been mirrored in the military field as well. During the
reign of Suharto, US-Indonesia military ties were very strong with the US being
the main supplier in terms of arms, weaponry and military training and expertise.
This continued even after the Indonesian army's (commonly known as the TNI)
brutal annexation of East Timor in 1975 and the heavy handed use of force by
the TNI in displacing and killing up to 200,000 East Timorese. Throughout this
period US acquiescence was granted and America continued to supply military
hardware. This was due to the perceived greater danger of a communist presence
in Southeast Asia (East Timor was left leaning and Vietnam had gone communist
in the 1970's) as well as US policy in supporting Indonesia as the largest nation
in the newly formed ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations). Thus America's
strategic interests in the region were best served by supporting the Indonesian
regime and the TNI in particular. Relations between the US and Indonesia cooled during the 1990's due to three
events; firstly, the fall of Communism in Europe and the Soviet Union meant
that the threat to US interests from 'communist countries' in Southeast Asia
was essentially benign. Secondly, in 1991 the TNI fired upon a group of peaceful
pro-independence protestors in the East Timorese capital of Dili. This event
was escalated to a full blown incident as it was filmed by foreign journalists
and Indonesia came under international criticism. As a result, the US was forced
to curtail some of its military ties with the TNI. The US congress imposed a
ban on the training of Indonesian officers under the State department's International
Military Education and Training (IMET) program. The ban was extended to arms sales after militia's and armed groups rampaged
through East Timor in 1999 killing hundreds of people and causing damage as
the province was about to vote for independence from Indonesian rule. The TNI
were largely blamed for the ensuing bloodshed and senior TNI generals were accused
of complicity in some of the atrocities that were committed. Indonesia and the GWOT However, the reaction in Indonesia and as in most of the Muslim world to America's
GWOT has been a mixture of fear and loathing with the majority of Muslims seeing
the GWOT as a war on Islam and a campaign to further US interests. In Indonesia,
the public reaction to the US wish to include it as the 'second front on the
war on terror' was to reject this claim. In 2002, a survey showed only 1% of
the population viewed the 'war on terror' in Indonesia as a valid pursuit. At
first, the government appeared to agree with this position. In a reference to
the US assault on Afghanistan to search and destroy Al Qaeda, the foreign minister
Hasan Wirayuda, said: "The fact is that Indonesia is not Afghanistan and
we don't believe that Indonesia will be a future Afghanistan." However, relentless US pressure to extend the GWOT soon produced a shift in
the Indonesian government's stance. After the Bali bombing of October 2002,
the US placed Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) on its list of terrorist organisations before
any charges or trial had taken place. The US also vented its displeasure at
the judicial process for giving a light sentence to the Bali bombers and the
slow pace of the investigations. The US alleged that JI and Laskar Jihad (LJ)
were linked to Al Qaeda or were at least sympathetic to its causes. US pressure
soon paid off and the Indonesia government was forced to do a U-turn. For example,
in 2003 then President Megawati Sukarnoputri said that her government would
'dismantle the terrorist network to its roots'. In last years Presidential elections,
both candidates, Megawati and Yudhoyono, ran on a platform of pledging to be
severe on any radical Islamic groups or anti American outfits. The New York
Times commented: "The United States did not publicly express its preference
in the election, but Washington officials made it clear that they believed that
the general [Yudhoyono] had a better grasp of how to control Jemaah Islamiyah,
the radical Islamic group held responsible" for the terrorist attacks in
Indonesia. US support for the Indonesian army: US support and closer ties with the TNI is aimed at bringing about the following: The TNI is Indonesia's most powerful institution and a key determinant in whoever
comes to power. Indeed, Yudhoyono is an ex general who served under previous
Indonesian regimes. Despite the condemnation of the attack by human rights groups and individual
US politicians no real pressure was brought to bear upon the Indonesian government
or the TNI. Rather, policy throughout the first Bush administration was to repeal
the ban on arms sales to Indonesia and bring about closer ties. The architect
of US policy towards Indonesia was former deputy secretary of defence, Paul
Wolfowitz, who had been ambassador to Indonesia for three years and was considered
an expert on the region. He told the Washington Post in 2002 that even if the
TNI were implicated in the West Papua killings, US military aid should continue
because "more contact with the West and with the United States and moving
them in a positive direction is important both to support democracy in Indonesia
and to support the fight against terrorism". Notwithstanding this event, further pressure to increase military ties was
brought by the RAND Corporation who issued a report asking for the resumption
of US-Indonesian military ties and the lifting of the ban on IMET. The report
stated that "Since military training for Indonesia was effectively terminated
in 1992, there has been a 'lost generation' of Indonesian officers - officers
who have no experience with the United States or who have no understanding of
the importance that the United States military attaches to civilian leadership,
democracy, and respect for human rights," This was echoed by the Defence Department who called for greater military ties
with the TNI. Donald Rumsfeld said," I think it is unfortunate that the
U.S. today does not have military-to-military relationships with Indonesia". Other lobby groups during this period called for the resumption of IMET as
well as increased arms sales and military co-operation between the two countries.
The most influential amongst them has been the United States-Indonesia Society
(USINDO), a Washington-based non-governmental organization whose members include
major US corporations with businesses in Indonesia, such as Exxon-Mobil and
Freeport-McMoran Copper & Gold. In June 2004, the US administration reversed its previous reticence on the
West Papua incident and sided with the TNI's version of events. Attorney General,
John Ashcroft, indicted an Indonesian commander of the OPM as responsible for
the killings of the US citizens. Finally, in February 2005 Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice announced that the IMET program would be resumed after a 14
year suspension and that the US administration was satisfied that the Indonesian
government and TNI were taking the appropriate steps for reform and accountability.
Rice said that "IMET for Indonesia is in the US interest". The 26th December 2004 earthquake and resulting Tsunami that devastated the
region predominantly had its biggest impact in Indonesia's north west region
of Aceh. The TNI came under widespread criticism from aid agencies and people
within the effected region due to their slow and inadequate response. Troops
and resources were not deployed to Aceh until a few days after the tsunami struck
and many thousands of people remained homeless and destitute weeks after the
tragedy. Only a tiny fraction (5%) of the thousands of TNI troops stationed
in Aceh were mobilised for the relief efforts. Reports stated that the TNI refused
aid and prevented relief organisations from helping those in need so that they
remained in control. Others reported that the TNI restarted its attacks against
Acehnese rebels in the long running secessionist dispute. The TNI's own report
of the tsunami relief operation acknowledges the poor response it showed towards
the disaster. It states that it's humanitarian commitment 'was minimal, primarily
aimed towards Indonesian and Western public opinion and not, as its chief executives
and PR claimed, to any genuine humanitarian relief in Aceh'. Yet, despite the widespread criticism of the Indonesian authorities and the
TNI in particular, the USA lavished considerable praise upon the TNI as part
of the current climate in fostering closer ties between the two nations. On
March 10th, Deputy Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Marie
Huhtala said, "The Indonesian military, contrary to the assumptions of many in the international
media did not attempt systematically to siphon off aid, prevent relief workers
from reaching tsunami victims, or impose onerous restrictions on them" The USA has largely supported the Indonesian government and TNI's efforts to
quell the secessionist movements in Aceh and West Papua and has been muted in
its response to the disproportionate force used by the TNI against the Free
Aceh movement (GAM) and the Free Papua movement (OPM). Thus far, America has
refused to have either of these groups put on its list of terrorist organisation.
However, on 25th May President Bush reaffirmed his support for Indonesia's territorial
integrity and reiterated the US position that it opposed secessionist movements
in any part of Indonesia. Parallel to US efforts at supporting the TNI in order to engender closer ties
with Indonesia, the US has also intensified its cultural and educational assault
upon Indonesia. With the world's fourth largest population, and hundreds of
millions of Muslims, the USA has made fervent attempts to mould and promote
a type of Islam to its liking. Deputy secretary of state, Robert Zoellick, commented
that the region was important as part of the intra-Muslim struggle for the 'soul
of Islam'. The US has increased efforts to strengthen the cultural and educational ties
between the two nations. In reality, it has been blatant propaganda to change
Muslim hearts and minds and replace Islamic ideas with western secular values.
In October 2003, Bush pledged $157m dollars as part of a 6 year program to change
Indonesia's education system to allow the teaching of a more 'moderate' Islam,
quell anti Americanism and facilitate greater contact with the West. In addition,
working behind the scenes the US Agency for International Aid (USAID) has helped
fund 30 Muslim organisations. These programs cover media production, workshops
for Islamic scholars, curriculum reform and radio stations and newspapers. All
intended to show 'Islamic tolerance', the West in a more favourable light and
highlight Islam's compatibility with democracy and human rights. With regard to the Southeast Asian region it is likely that there will be heightened
US activity over the coming years. America is concerned with Islamic activism
within Malaysia and the Philippines, in particular the southern part of Mindanao.
Last month, the US charge d'affaires remarked that this area was turning into
a centre for terrorists and risked becoming another Afghanistan. The US is also
perturbed by the strong sentiments for Islam shown by the Muslims for the plight
of their brethren worldwide as shown by the recent demonstrations in Indonesia
against the massacres in Uzbekistan and the abuse of the Qur'an by US forces.
The USA will continue to develop closer economic ties in the form of free trade
agreements with Singapore and Thailand to tap into the rich natural resources
of the area. On a security level the US wishes to extend its military and naval
bases in the Asia-Pacific region so that it can keep a close eye on North Korea
and China and extend the sale of its anti-missile system which Australia, Philippines,
India and Japan have signed up to. Finally, the US recently announced that it
wished to revitalise ASEAN and intends to use its close ties with Indonesia
as a foothold in this important region. |