Entered into the database on Wednesday, July 19th, 2006 @ 15:38:40 MST
Predicts Bush Regime Will Stage Terrorist Attack to Provide Pretext
for Iran, Syria Invasion, And Justify Internment Camps for American People Daniel Ellsberg is a former American military analyst employed by the RAND
Corporation who precipitated a national firestorm in 1971 when he released the
Pentagon Papers, the US military's account of activities during the Vietnam
War, to The New York Times. The release awakened the American people to a systematic
program of organized deception carried out by the Pentagon against the population
to continue the Vietnam War. Daniel Ellsberg, speaking on air to GCN radio host Jack Blood, stated his concerns
that criminal elements of the US government were psychologically capable to
have carried out 9/11. He warned that within days after a US military strike
on Iran that Bush's handlers would probably stage some type of terror attack
in the West to legitimize the new war. Ellsberg went on to state that another major Reichstag-like state-sponsored attack
would be followed by a martial law scenario which might include detention camps
for American dissenters. Ellsberg said that he worked with individuals at the highest levels of government
who staged war provocations several times to whip up pro-war sentiment in the
US. Daniel Ellsberg now joins the ranks of hundreds of prominent engineers,
physicists, economists, military officers, pilots, high-level intelligence analysts,
and cabinet ministers who are exposing the 9/11 hoax. Each day more and more respected
professionals are going public with their questions about the official 9/11
fable. The 9/11 cover-up dam is breaking under the weight of these truthseekers'
efforts and the perpetrators of 9/11 are watching them in horror while wondering
who will be the next to speak up. Here is a partial transcript of the interview: Jack Blood: Have you had a chance to take a look at a lot
of this information coming from America’s leading scholars, physicists,
engineers, etc. Who have taken a look now at 9/11 and are now, not only questioning
what might have happened on 9/11, but really being very direct including a number
of high level … Daniel Ellsberg: Actually, I have looked at a lot of that,
and I’ll tell you without going into it all which would take a lot of
time, I find some of it very implausible and other parts of it quite solid,
and there’s no question in my mind that there’s enough evidence
there to justify a very comprehensive and hard hitting investigation of a kind
that we’ve not seen, with subpoenas, general questioning of people, and
raising the release of a lot of documents, there’s no question that (D.E.
chuckles) put it this way, very serious questions have been raised, about how
much they knew beforehand and how much involvement there may been. Is the, is
a administration capable, humanly and physiologically of engineering such a
provocation? Yes, I would say that, I worked for such an administration myself, Johnson,
ah, President Johnson put destroyers in harm’s way in the Tonkin Gulf
not only once, but several times, with the, with a lot of his people hoping
that it would lead to a confrontation and claiming that it had. And could have
resulted in the lost of many lives in the course of it. And what I’m saying
now, by the way though is this, and here there’s a very strong analogy,
to this day there is a controversy gone back and forth historically, as to who
caused the Reichstag fire, the burning of their parliament, the Reichstag, on
February 27 th 1933. Goering, at one point, the number two man in the Nazi regime,
said “I set that fire”, later he denied that at Nuremberg, and I’ve
noticed that the latest history suggests, that it wasn’t the Nazi’s.
The point is that all this time later is there is still a controversy about
that. But, what there’s no controversy about is the use the Nazi’s
made of it, that very night and the next day. J.B. Cui Bono, who benefits D.E. February 28 th, there was a Reichstag fire decree that
ended freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of association, all in
the Weimar Constitution, and privacy of the postal system and of communications
and of telephone, what ended here to, more than we knew four years ago right
after 9/11. If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East
involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day
after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve
massive detentions in this country, detention camps for middle-easterners and
their quote “sympathizers”, critics of the President’s policy
and essentially the wiping-out of the Bill of Rights. J.B. I know your walking very carefully here Daniel Ellsberg,
but that’s pretty strong medicine and we have to look at the history of
the world, governments do this, as you mentioned, governments are liars, governments
are murderers, they, this is not above them, I’m sure your familiar with
the Northwoods Document. D.E. Ah yes, indeed. Yeah talking about a manufactured provocation
which could have involved even the shooting down of an American or some other
airliner, with American support. Yes I would say by the way, that Americans
definitely play this game, I’m sure that it’s happening now. We, I expected by the way, Bush to manufacture a kind of Tonkin Gulf incident
before he went into Iraq and then I decided well I’d been wrong they didn’t
feel they needed that. It is interesting that the memos that came out, in conversations
between Blair and Bush, (aka The White House Memo), show that Bush was pressing
for the possibility of sending over a U-2 and getting it fired on and using
that as an excuse. J.B. A U-2 painted like a U.N., ah, a United Nations airplane. D.E. Yes, but they couldn’t do that again for sure.
But, what is happening right now is that Israel is clearly seeking a generally
provocative act by both Hammas and Hezbollah, which I think were not wise acts
some people are applauding those in the Middle-East passing out sweets and so
forth, very short-sighted I would say, a lot of innocent people are going to
die as a result. __________________ Read from Looking Glass News Scholars
for 9/11 Truth under Attack Pentagon
911 Witness - Interview with April Gallop Former
Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect Disgusting
Iran-Contra Criminal Grills Jim Fetzer Former
Reagan Deputy and Colonel Says 9/11 "Dog That Doesn't Hunt" Reynolds:
"Come Out of the White House with Your Hands Up!" Former
Reagan Treasury Secretary Questions Twin Towers Collapse
Representative Of Largest 9/11 Families Group Says Government Complicit In Attack
Norge
"Le Monde" puts 9/11 on Front Page Connecting
The Dots - Zionists & 911 The
Israeli Moles Who Controlled U.S. Defense Computers on 9/11 Rumors
of Israeli Involvement in 9/11 How
Flight 77 Hitting The Pentagon Would Really Look? 9-11:
Animation showing military precision of flight paths Planes
of 911 Exceeded Their Software Limits 9/11:
The Myth and the Reality The
Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training A
Half-Dozen Questions About 9/11 They Don't Want You to Ask 20
reasons to question the official story of 9/11 9/10/01
: ON THE EVE OF DESTRUCTION 5
Reasons to Question the Official 9/11 Story
