9-11 - LOOKING GLASS NEWS | |
Representative Of Largest 9/11 Families Group Says Government Complicit In Attack |
|
by Paul Joseph Watson PrisonPlanet.com Entered into the database on Saturday, July 08th, 2006 @ 12:55:57 MST |
|
Tells radio host 9/11 Commission a sham, "cover-up beyond belief" The representative of the largest group of 9/11 families says that
the official version of events is a fallacy and that the NORAD stand down and
evidence of incendiary devices used to bring down the towers amount to government
complicity in the attacks - a conclusion shared by half of the 9/11 families
he represents. Doyle heads the Coalition
of 9/11 Families and lost his own son Joey in the collapse of the twin towers.
"If you want to believe what they want to snow you under on like the 9/11
Commission - that's a total fallacy," said Doyle. "The continuing cover-up is beyond belief," Doyle told GCN radio
host Alex Jones. Doyle questioned why WTC steel that was withheld from NIST for examination
for explosives was used instead to build a battleship. "Isn't it amazing how they got it out of this country within days,"
said Doyle as he addressed the cover-up of the physical evidence from a crime
scene. Doyle said he had personally talked to six different individuals who were at
the World Trade Center site and described incendiary devices before the collapse
of the towers. "It's documented proof that tower 7 was not hit by a plane yet it goes
up in flames then the owner of the place Larry Silverstein himself ordered it
to be pulled at 4 o'clock that afternoon and all of a sudden it exploded straight
down." "We have two planes fly into the towers and all of a sudden they get blown
up within an hour and a half - that's impossible," said Doyle. Doyle estimated that around half of the family members his organization represents
think that there was government complicity in the attacks. "It looks like there was a conspiracy behind 9/11 if you really look at
all the facts - a lot of families now feel the same way." "Where was NORAD," asked Doyle as he highlighted the implausible
gap between the known hijacking times of Flight 93 and Flight 77 and their eventual
destruction. "It was called a step-down - don't do anything - let it happen." "From everything I look at I'm sure there was a lot of complicity - in
the least there had to be a lot of complicity - if you read all the facts there's
no way that nineteen hijackers carried out this mission," Doyle told Jones. Doyle also spoke out on establishment charities withholding large portions
of donations from 9/11 families and how 9/11 whistleblowers have been punished
meanwhile individuals who facilitated the attacks were rewarded. _______________________ Read from Looking Glass News Norge
"Le Monde" puts 9/11 on Front Page 9/11:
The Myth and the Reality The
Destruction of the World Trade Center The
Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training A
Half-Dozen Questions About 9/11 They Don't Want You to Ask 20
reasons to question the official story of 9/11 Flying
a Plane Into the World Trade Center? 9/10/01
: ON THE EVE OF DESTRUCTION 5
Reasons to Question the Official 9/11 Story Scientific
Evidence that Official 9/11 Story is a Lie How
Flight 77 Hitting The Pentagon Would Really Look? |