ECONOMICS - LOOKING GLASS NEWS | |
To Whom Does the Future Belong? |
|
by Bill Bonner LewRockwell.com Entered into the database on Thursday, June 02nd, 2005 @ 11:23:15 MST |
|
"Millionaire Ranks Hit New High," says the Wall Street Journal. Not
since 1998 – near the peak of the dotcom bubble – have so many people
gotten rich. "The number of U.S. households with a net worth of $1 million or more
rose 21% in 2004, according to a survey released yesterday by Spectrem Group,
a wealth-research firm in Chicago," continues the article. "There now are 7.5 million millionaire households in the U.S., breaking
the record set in 1999 of 7.1 million. The study excluded the value of primary
residences, but included second homes and other real estate. "A separate study, also released yesterday, by Boston Consulting Group
found that the U.S. continues to lead the world in creating new millionaires.
The number of households in the U.S. with liquid assets of $20 million or more
is increasing by 3,000 households a year." Once again, we are confronted by a contradiction, a paradox, or a damned lie. Overall, the American economy is in decline. It "grows." But its
growing is progress on the downhill slope. It is like a man on his deathbed
advancing to the grave. Every day brings it closer – at a rate of about
$2 billion per day. Earnings are stagnant. People spend more than they earn...while
their biggest living expense – the cost of housing – soars. How could it be that they get richer at the same time? We have come to a curious conclusion. That once the zeitgeist...the ruling
spirit...of these united states inclined towards empire, all its institutions,
its constitution, its news media, its philosophies and folklore, its theories
and popular hysterias, and even its statistics had to bend. After 1989, the
United States was clearly the master of the world. If it was master of the world
it must be superior to it. Everything about it must be superior; its intellectuals
and public chatterers just had to explain why. Why is the U.S. economy so superior? Because it is a paragon of "technological
dynamism, openness to trade, and flexibility," volunteered David H. Levey
and Stuart S. Brown, writing in Foreign Affairs magazine. "Would-be Cassandras
have been predicting the imminent downfall of the American imperium ever since
its inception," the pair begins. But don't worry, "U.S. power is firmly
grounded on economic superiority and financial stability that will not end soon." How they know what will be reported in tomorrow's newspapers they do not bother
to explain. Nor do they explain how being open to trade helps a country that
has given itself a competitive disadvantage, or why, if the U.S. economy is
so dynamic and flexible, it cannot afford to raise wages...or pay for what it
consumes on a current basis. But when the "facts" seem to contradict the imperial theory, the
"facts" are bent. Here, misters Levey and Brown go to work with crowbars: "Capital gains on equities, 401(k) plans, and home values are excluded
from measurements of personal saving; when they are added, total U.S. domestic
saving is around 20 percent of GDP – about the same rate as in other developed
economies. The national account also excludes 'intangible' investment: spending
on knowledge-creating activities such as on-the-job training, new-product development
and testing, design and blueprint experimentation, and managerial time spent
on workplace organization." Intangible investment? Why didn't we think of that sooner! The trouble with
the concept is that it produces intangible products, intangible profits, and
intangible wages. Maybe the employees will get to enjoy an intangible sandwich
someday. The only way Americans continue living in the style to which they've become
accustomed is by mortgaging the inflated value of their own tangible homes...and
running public sector deficits – both are forms of stealing from the future.
Only an old man with nothing more to prove would say so, but the U.S. economy
in 2005 has become what Warren Buffett calls "Squanderville." Americans,
he says, are becoming "sharecroppers," in an "ownership"
society. But whence cometh these 7.5 million millionaires? They blow in on the same gust of deceit that bends the rest of America. Even
though primary residences were not included in the calculations directly, the
whoosh of debt lifts up all assets. Owners' equity sustains borrowing...and
other assets, including second homes and property investments – rise too.
And it reduces the need to sell other assets – since equity can be taken
out and spent almost as easily as you can order a pizza. This boosts up asset
prices generally and puts millions of people with rather ordinary finances into
the millionaire category. It is all a conceit and a fraud. But at least people are enjoying it. |