View without photos
View with photos

A Construction Drill Provides A Martial Law Drill
by Paul Joseph Watson    PrisonPlanet.com
Entered into the database on Monday, May 29th, 2006 @ 10:37:40 MST


Untitled Document

Capitol shutdown highlights manic panic of post-9/11 mentality

The over hyped false alarm of a construction drill that caused a mass panic over rumors of gunshots in the Rayburn Building on Friday and the way in which it was reported by the servile media was a means of indoctrinating Americans to the procedure of martial law lock down of a major city.

Following reports of gunfire in the Rayburn Building, House members were ordered to stay inside and shut all the doors. Parts of the Capitol complex, including the Capitol itself, were locked down during the height of the search.

In addition, the Washington Post reported that schools not just on Capitol Hill but "throughout the city" were also placed on lock down.

Police went door to door inside the buildings as an FBI SWAT team ordered House members to put their hands on their heads and frog marched them out of a committee room and through a metal detector.

Two women reported a man with a gun inside a Rayburn gym as another panicked and had to be taken to hospital. The gunman turned out to be a plain clothed police officer and the source of the 'gunfire' was an air hammer or a pneumatic drill being used in construction work on nearby elevator.

The construction drill created the perfect mandate for another type of drill, that of authoritarian martial law city shutdown. The opportunity to parade SWAT teams, sniffer dogs, police with assault weapons and armed FBI tactical units wearing flak jackets did not go to waste.

Americans were told in no uncertain terms that in times of crisis, the men in black uniforms enforcing mandatory relocation and quarantines were here to help.

Fox News were salivating over the non-incident to the same degree that they rubbed their hands over the Pentagon tape flop. After two and a half hours of continual coverage and with it becoming blindingly obvious that there was no shooting incident, Fox told its viewers that they were seeing "our government work and work the way it is supposed to do," despite the fact that the lurking enemy to which our omnipotent government was responding was nothing more than a work tool.

As News Hounds pointed out, Fox was not going let an opportunity to showcase the police state go to waste.

"Why did Fox News stick with blanket coverage so long, preempting its regular coverage? Fox News loves pictures of people in uniforms with guns. Such images reinforce the perception that Americans live in constant danger and must keep the growing police state atmosphere in place regardless of the cost in terms of civil liberties. In other words, "See what could happen, America? This is why the government needs to spy on you, track your phone calls, and who knows what else. We're here to protect you."

Fox's Catherine Herridge even went so far as to say that the whole incident was a learning curve for terrorists to judge police reaction. The pounding fear-driven specter of terrorists, alarm and panic was carefully interwoven into what otherwise was a complete non-event.

Following the confirmation that the whole charade was a false alarm, Fox relentlessly pressed on and bizarrely interlinked the concept of jailing reporters who publish sensitive information with misinterpreted construction noises.

Regular panics and false alarms plague the House and Senate complex and the frenzy and trepidation of the scare is always paraded across television networks to full effect.

In May 2004 US News and World Report and others reported that the US election could be cancelled in the event of a terror attack on the Capitol Building in Washington. The magazine said that White House officials were under a "working premise" that an attack was inevitable and that it was "going to happen." It was reported that the administration was conducting secret antiterrorism exercises in preparation for this scenario.

So it follows that on June 10 2004, the U.S. Capitol and Supreme Court were evacuated when a small plane entered restricted airspace during the funeral procession of former President Ronald Reagan.

The terror and consternation was encapsulated by a Washington Post report on the incident.

Scores of members of Congress and thousands of staffers poured out the doors as police officers shouted, "This is not a drill!"

"As they fled, some people dropped briefcases and women flung off high heels. Amy Call, a spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), said police told people to "run, get out of the Capitol," because of the "imminent" approach of an airplane.

Nearby on the Mall, U.S. Park Police and Capitol Police ordered people to flee. "Do not stop," officers yelled. "Keep moving."

"Ladies and gentlemen, let's move like our lives depend on it. I mean it!" a D.C. police officer screamed."

Similar alarms occurred again in 2004 and 2005, providing the media with images of panic-stricken politicians and others running from the Capitol as armed SWAT teams swarmed around barking orders, invoking memories of people clamoring to escape the wave of dust on New York City streets as the twin towers collapsed on 9/11.

These scenes have become the archetype for the post-9/11 American security obsessed mentality and they are being ceaselessly recreated in order to inculcate Americans with a sense of dread and a prevailing message that in times of emergency, whether real or manufactured, the government is your boss and you will follow their every order, no matter how brutal, in order to ensure everyone's safety.