| 9-11 - LOOKING GLASS NEWS | |
|
5 Reasons to Question the Official 9/11 Story |
|
|
by George Washington George Washington's Blog Entered into the database on Tuesday, February 21st, 2006 @ 16:03:53 MST |
|
(1) While the government has consistently stated that it did
not know where the aircraft were before they struck, the Secretary of Transportation
testified before the 9/11 Commission that Vice President Cheney monitored flight
77 for many miles as it approached the Pentagon and -- when a military man asked
"do the orders still stand?" -- Cheney responded affirmatively: "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when
it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said
to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president
turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still
stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?" http://www.911truthmovement.org/video/ (2) The tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty
on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting
the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash
cans around the building http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res= (3) The Secret Service, which is highly trained to whisk the
president away from danger and to a secure location in the event of a threat,
breached all standard procedures and allowed President Bush to remain at a highly-publicized
location for 25 minutes after it was known that the nation was under attack http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/9-11secretservice.html (4) In addition to the Twin Towers, a third world trade center
building, WTC7, collapsed on the afternoon of 9/11. WTC7 was never hit by plane,
contained only small fires before the collapse, fell at free-fall speed (the
same speed as if there were no floors or walls to cause resistance), collapsed
symetrically (which makes no sense since fires burned in only some parts of
the building), became the first steel-frame building in history to collapse
due to fire alone, somehow generated temperatures so high that its huge steel
beams were partly evaporated, and produced unusual chemical reactions consistent
with the use of high-explosives. Indeed, even the government agency investigating the collapse said that --
other than an explanation involving demolition with bombs -- "the [next]
best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence." http://www.wtc7.net/ and http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html (5) Recently declassified documents show that in the 1960's,
the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN
airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and
also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the
Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. This plan is only one of a series created over hundreds of years by governments
around the world to garner support for their military agendas by sponsoring
terrorism and then blaming it on others, or intentionally allowing an enemy's
attack to succeed as a Pearl Harbor type justification for war. Indeed, this
technique has been used for so long that Plato discussed it back in ancient
Greece. http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1
and northwoods.pdf">http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/ There are literally hundreds of other reasons to question the official story
about what happened on 9/11. The 9/11 Commission never addressed these issues.
Indeed, even the former director of the FBI says there was a cover up by the
9/11 Commission: If this list of 5 facts has made you the slightest bit curious,
www.ScholarsFor911Truth.org
and www.911Proof.com
are good places to look for answers. | |